msweet Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Missing the playoffs paid off, just don't expect general manager Lou Lamoriello to admit it. The Devils hit the jackpot at the NHL draft in St. Paul last night, stealing second-rated Swedish defenseman Adam Larsson with their No. 4 pick, itself upgraded from eighth when they won the draft lottery in April. "Nothing will take the sting out of missing the playoffs, but this certainly is a consolation," Lamoriello told The Post. "You don't often get a chance to get a player of this caliber." 2011-12 SCHEDULE Cashing in their highest draft pick since taking Scott Niedermayer third 20 years ago, the Devils think they have nabbed another cornerstone rebuilding block. "This team fits me perfect," said Larsson. New Jersey knocked the Islanders to fifth by winning the lottery, probably keeping Larsson from the Isles. Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/devils/how_swede_it_is_01ZMHIstksig3qQuLO0GXP#ixzz1QJ6q2y4e Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quinn01 Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 (edited) I cant wait to see him attend the camp. I dont figure he will be up in the roster for another season or two but I think he is going to be solid for us later on. Great skater, great hands and likes to toss his weight around. Something that we have needed as far as Dmen go. "My goal is to play in the NHL next year." -Larsson We will see, he may surprise everyone in the camp this year and end up playing a bit for the Devils. Edited June 25, 2011 by Quinn01 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devs4LIFE Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Still in shock that he slipped to the 4th spot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grcenter47 Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 i wonder how all the draft picks will turn out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hobgoblin933 Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Didn't Hedman play the same year he was drafted? Why does everyone doubt so much he'll play next year? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil Dan 56 Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Didn't Hedman play the same year he was drafted? Why does everyone doubt so much he'll play next year? Probably because we rarely get players this early. Most of our guys aren't ready to step in yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamtheprodigy Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Didn't Hedman play the same year he was drafted? Why does everyone doubt so much he'll play next year? Even if he's better than Hedman was at the same point, the circumstances are very different. Unless trades are made to open up cap space, we might not have a ton of room to fit Larsson, as we'd have bonuses going against the cap hit. He might fit depending on any other signings we make but it could be tight. Add the fact that we have no reason to rush him and it means that there's a good chance that he won't be on the team this year. But we will see. If he blows everyone away in camp then space will be made. Lou doesn't rush players but if they are ready he doesn't hold them back either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revan Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Before the draft Conte said his goal was to pick a guy who could step into the NHL this year and after we drafted Larsson it seemed like he was the team's top choice all along. Of course, Conte isn't Lou and it doesn't necessarily mean Larsson is sure to play this fall (especially if he doesn't impress on the camp), but David knows prospects better than anyone (28 years in the job in NJ, unbelievable) and if he says something like this, he has a reason to do it. Putting Larsson in there so soon obviously has its drawbacks, with the cap hit and the guy becoming a UFA earlier (I believe), so I'd rather they are 100% sure he is going to have an impact before making that move. Remember Stamkos' rookie year? He was struggling and the situation was so tense Tortorella wanted him sent down and eventually it was him who got canned. So, even some of the best players aren't immediately NHL-ready and you have to be very careful here. It's not worth screwing his contract up a bit if he is going to be a 3rd pair, 10-point guy only IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devilsfan118 Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Don't know how the Devils could fit him if they don't trade off some salary first Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamtheprodigy Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Before the draft Conte said his goal was to pick a guy who could step into the NHL this year and after we drafted Larsson it seemed like he was the team's top choice all along. Of course, Conte isn't Lou and it doesn't necessarily mean Larsson is sure to play this fall (especially if he doesn't impress on the camp), but David knows prospects better than anyone (28 years in the job in NJ, unbelievable) and if he says something like this, he has a reason to do it. Putting Larsson in there so soon obviously has its drawbacks, with the cap hit and the guy becoming a UFA earlier (I believe), so I'd rather they are 100% sure he is going to have an impact before making that move. Remember Stamkos' rookie year? He was struggling and the situation was so tense Tortorella wanted him sent down and eventually it was him who got canned. So, even some of the best players aren't immediately NHL-ready and you have to be very careful here. It's not worth screwing his contract up a bit if he is going to be a 3rd pair, 10-point guy only IMO. Are you sure you have that quote right? I'm pretty sure he was asked if his goal was to draft a player who could play in the NHL this year and his answer was something like "I want to draft a player who can play in the NHL for 20 years." Don't know how the Devils could fit him if they don't trade off some salary first In the other thread sundstrom was able to do it. It's possible, but a pretty tight fit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revan Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 (edited) Are you sure you have that quote right? I'm pretty sure he was asked if his goal was to draft a player who could play in the NHL this year and his answer was something like "I want to draft a player who can play in the NHL for 20 years." Ah, yes, you're right - I checked it now. I probably read a tad too much yesterday and I just remember looking through the first paragraph of one of the articles - must have misread it. Anyway, anything's possible. I would still wait a year though - the guy plays in a senior league, and a very strong one, so it wouldn't hurt if he spent one more year developing there. Plus, we have a boatload of money coming off the books in 2012 (Marty + White + Salvador + Rolston = over 16M, nice), so we should be able to fit him in there fairly easily. Edited June 25, 2011 by Revan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elias2600 Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 He was struggling and the situation was so tense Tortorella wanted him sent down and eventually it was him who got canned. Pretty sure Tortarella was already gone at that point. Barry Melrose was the first NHL coach Stamkos had. Otherwise you are correct, and I do agree that we have no reason to rush Larsson. However, if he is ready, there is no reason to hold him back either. He will likely hold a 3 million dollar cap hit when signed, so we would need to have space. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghdi Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Putting Larsson in there so soon obviously has its drawbacks, with the cap hit and the guy becoming a UFA earlier (I believe), so I'd rather they are 100% sure he is going to have an impact before making that move. Remember Stamkos' rookie year? He was struggling and the situation was so tense Tortorella wanted him sent down and eventually it was him who got canned. So, even some of the best players aren't immediately NHL-ready and you have to be very careful here. It's not worth screwing his contract up a bit if he is going to be a 3rd pair, 10-point guy only IMO. It also has its positives. Defenseman typically take longer to develop but playing the league will help him more than it would help someone undersized/lack of experience. Doughty, at the extreme of the spectrum, was a good contributor his first year in LA, not earth-shattering, but Doughty's rookie year #'s were stronger than Andy Greene's were this year. Erik Johnson also contributed in his rookie year. Byfuglien also was pretty good his first full year. While obviously, Larsson wont have the experience of Greene so #s arent the best barometer, thats where I think the answer to Larsson is coming from. If we don't re-sign Andy Greene, Adam Larsson gets that money that was earmarked for Greene. Larsson is a Devil this year then. If we re-sign Greene, I think Larsson goes back to Sweden for this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyP. Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Any early predictions on what # Larsson will wear long term as a Devil? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quinn01 Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 (edited) Any early predictions on what # Larsson will wear long term as a Devil? He is number 5 with Skellefteå AIK which that wont happen with White around. Ill predict 15 or 27. Edited June 25, 2011 by Quinn01 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyP. Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 How bout if Greene goes bye bye? Larsson #6 or take #2 from Fraser? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snartly Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 (edited) I sat keep Larsson in Sweeden until next year. Tyler Myers waited a year before going into the NHL after he was drafted, and he got a lot of Help from Tallinder. It is kind of like a wining deal also if you put Larsson this year into the NHL so he will learn earlier from Tallinder, and get more exp. With the number thing, he probably would take #4, but Stevens has that number retired. Maybe 55? But that is kinda a high number to be on the Devils. Edited June 25, 2011 by snartly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sundstrom Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Are you sure you have that quote right? I'm pretty sure he was asked if his goal was to draft a player who could play in the NHL this year and his answer was something like "I want to draft a player who can play in the NHL for 20 years." In the other thread sundstrom was able to do it. It's possible, but a pretty tight fit. yeah - and i did this with expensive scratches and no roster moves (i.e. clarkson, zubrus, rolston jettisoned). if they feel he's good enough to make the team, it's not really an issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devs3cups Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 It's a great pick. Great job to Lou and Conte!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devilsfan118 Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Any early predictions on what # Larsson will wear long term as a Devil? 11, because that's what he wore on the Devils in my NHL 11 Be a GM mode Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamtheprodigy Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 yeah - and i did this with expensive scratches and no roster moves (i.e. clarkson, zubrus, rolston jettisoned). if they feel he's good enough to make the team, it's not really an issue. Agreed. 11, because that's what he wore on the Devils in my NHL 11 Be a GM mode Same. I stole him and Tyler Seguin from the Boston Bruins while they were both entering their primes. lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SS-SS Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 11, because that's what he wore on the Devils in my NHL 11 Be a GM mode I had him wearing 56 .I don't know, but I think 56 fits great under Larsson on a Devils jersey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeford Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 I had him wearing 56 .I don't know, but I think 56 fits great under Larsson on a Devils jersey Lou doesn't give out high numbers, so you can forget that one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 (edited) Lou doesn't give out high numbers, so you can forget that one. Assuming Greene is gone, he'll be number 6 Edit: saw someone already said this. Edited June 25, 2011 by Daniel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SterioDesign Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 the best thing about Larsson is that he doesnt have a brother in the NHL that he would eventually want to play with and leave us lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.