Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Jas0nMacIsaac

4th Line fixed

51 posts in this topic

Aristotle says that appeal to authority is the weakest form of argument.

Please. You are the biggest know-it-all arm chair coach there is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So basically you are all saying you can evaluate better than a GM and coach at the NHL level.

Ok I guess I'm cool with that.

Gotta admit, I hate when posters resort to the "I have nothing more to argue so I'll argue that there's no point in these boards" argument.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gotta admit, I hate when posters resort to the "I have nothing more to argue so I'll argue that there's no point in these boards" argument.

I never said that. Where are you interpreting that from what I posted? I like the boards I just think the view on zharkov is wrong. Where am I stating that these boards have no point?

I am glad that you are the righteous one here and you just taught me a lesson. I really needed this wake up call.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I never said that. Where are you interpreting that from what I posted? I like the boards I just think the view on zharkov is wrong. Where am I stating that these boards have no point?

I am glad that you are the righteous one here and you just taught me a lesson. I really needed this wake up call.

As soon as you don't argue back with reason and resort to a, "Well your opinion isn't valid because you don't know what the pros know" argument you have lost the debate. Every other posts on these boards is either someone agreeing or disagreeing with something the Devils do. If everyone who disagrees is wrong because they aren't an NHL GM then there is no point in these boards. And besides that, the pros are far from infallible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As soon as you don't argue back with reason and resort to a, "Well your opinion isn't valid because you don't know what the pros know" argument you have lost the debate. Every other posts on these boards is either someone agreeing or disagreeing with something the Devils do. If everyone who disagrees is wrong because they aren't an NHL GM then there is no point in these boards. And besides that, the pros are far from infallible.

Exactly this - I couldn't've said it better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As soon as you don't argue back with reason and resort to a, "Well your opinion isn't valid because you don't know what the pros know" argument you have lost the debate. Every other posts on these boards is either someone agreeing or disagreeing with something the Devils do. If everyone who disagrees is wrong because they aren't an NHL GM then there is no point in these boards. And besides that, the pros are far from infallible.

And you like others took my sarcastic comment way too seriously so calm down a bit.

I know everyone has an opinion and I'm not going to take that away so I'm not arguing that. I just find it funny how I see someone here always mention zharkov when he has shown pretty much the same thing that most minor leaguers and 4th line scrubs do. If he is that talented, then what is Lou and company waiting for with this guy? If you take this and my post before as a threat to the board then I think you took too big of a leap there.

Hell if I really wanted to, I could have made my earlier post far more condescending like a certain prolific know-it-all on here whenever someone disagrees with him. Yet I didn't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And you like others took my sarcastic comment way too seriously so calm down a bit.

and now we have retreat and retraction. Thank you Sun Tzu.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and now we have retreat and retraction. Thank you Sun Tzu.

Lol if that makes you happy.

You certainly showed me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two additional token french guys, this is sure to be a cup run.

You guys can argue CORSI and metrics and all this other crap all you want, but I'll take French Canadians and players on the playoff tickets every time, thankyaverymuch.

Post of the Day, Jas0n. Post of the day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys can argue CORSI and metrics and all this other crap all you want, but I'll take French Canadians and players on the playoff tickets every time, thankyaverymuch.

Post of the Day, Jas0n. Post of the day.

Yeah if you look at our history... Brodeur and Lemieux were french and stevens, daneyko, niedermayer,maclean and muller were canadian..you can never have too much of those haha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that is reason why european players have just 3 Conn Smythe Trophy. and i don`t really sure that malkin`s trophy wasn`t pay for hartable season

Edited by Guadana

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aristotle says that appeal to authority is the weakest form of argument.

Aristotle was a terrible hockey coach.

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah if you look at our history... Brodeur and Lemieux were french and stevens, daneyko, niedermayer,maclean and muller were canadian..you can never have too much of those haha

I think he's referring to Marty claiming that having another French Canadian on the roster is good Cup luck. Lemieux and Richer in 95, Lemieux in 2000, and Pascal Rheaume in 2003. I think Marty joked about it in his book.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aristotle says that appeal to authority is the weakest form of argument.

What, you don't know any Socrates?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So crates! Or how about

Let me put it to you this way, ever hear of plato, aristotle, socrates?

Yes

Morons.

Fezzik, are there rocks ahead?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like someone finally got the point that you can't win with the Bash Bros on the 4th line.

Janssen and Boulton make the Bash Brothers looki like Gretzky and Messier!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fezzik, are there rocks ahead?

Stop rhyming, now, I mean it!

-Anybody want a peanut?

I think he's referring to Marty claiming that having another French Canadian on the roster is good Cup luck. Lemieux and Richer in 95, Lemieux in 2000, and Pascal Rheaume in 2003. I think Marty joked about it in his book.

Indeed.

There's two others that were common in all three Cup runs. One was actual players on the playoff tickets for season ticket holders. Can't remember what the third was.

Granted, the second and third requirements were probably discovered by fans, but Marty himself says another French Canadian on the team for a Cup run is good Devils juju.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Zharkov is certainly better than #22 or #25, and I would rather he be up here than those two " stuck in my own end" farooqin pylons

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Zharkov is certainly better than #22 or #25, and I would rather he be up here than those two " stuck in my own end" farooqin pylons

Bouton and Janssen have totally different roles than Zharkov.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0