Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Daniel

2013-14 OOT Thread

1,872 posts in this topic

Sharks extend both Jumbo Joe and Marleau on pretty reasonable deals.  Good for them.

 

Can't believe the Sharks haven't been to the SCF recently with all that talent over there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow isles just got a goal overturned in OT. No way was that a kick. More proof nhl war room is a joke. But whatever if it helps us down the road.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow isles just got a goal overturned in OT. No way was that a kick. More proof nhl war room is a joke. But whatever if it helps us down the road.

That was one of the worst video reviews I've ever seen. The officiating on and off the ice is astoundingly absurd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't agree more with you two about that goal being over turned. It was clear as day that he didn't try to kick it. Its amazing how these reviews are all over the place.

At some point they should just waive off everything that goes off a foot at least then it would be consistent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Miller has been my favorite non devil the last 3 weeks. If Washington, Winnipeg and Buffalo win this could be my ideal night.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so Flyers lots (a lot) today, Colombus is losing right now with less than a period to play. If we win tomorrow we're back in the mix for now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's my rule proposal.

 

1. Pucks that are either flat on the ice or rolling on the ice that go off a skate and into the net shall be ruled as no goal.

  • My reasoning for this is that 95% of the controversies with kicked in goals involve a puck on the ice.  This rule would remove most grey area.  It would mean the goal today, the Gallagher goal against the Devils, the Gallagher goal against the Rangers, the Janssen goal against the Rangers, etc would all be called off by this rule.

2. Pucks that are elevated that happen to bounce off the skate boot shall be ruled a goal provided the skate stays planted on the ice.

  • My reasoning here is that it's really difficult to kick in a goal with an elevated puck with the skate planted to the ice.  That way we can almost assure it's not on purpose.  Also, the fact that a player has to keep his skate planted fixes the safety issue.  It means no worrying about getting sliced by a skate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so Colorado turned down a trade offer : Parenteau for Bourque... 

 

Well OBVIOUSLY you turn down that offer but it means that Parenteau is available and he has a really good contract i find. Lou should look into this IMO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so Colorado turned down a trade offer : Parenteau for Bourque... 

 

Well OBVIOUSLY you turn down that offer but it means that Parenteau is available and he has a really good contract i find. Lou should look into this IMO

 

I kind of like Parenteau but I wonder if we really want to acquire another player on the wrong side of his prime and stick him on his off-wing. Plus there's the return to discuss as well, which I reckon would be young defensemen and I'm not sure whom I'd give up just yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so Colorado turned down a trade offer : Parenteau for Bourque... 

 

Well OBVIOUSLY you turn down that offer but it means that Parenteau is available and he has a really good contract i find. Lou should look into this IMO

I've heard something similar to this too. Do you have a reliable source? I ask because I would be very interested in Parenteau, especially if he can play LW. Also, I read somewhere that Montreal turned down this trade, so who knows how much truth there is to this.

 

I also heard that he was scratched only because Roy wanted to rest him during a busy stretch since he just come back from injury. This makes a bit more sense to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've heard something similar to this too. Do you have a reliable source? I ask because I would be very interested in Parenteau, especially if he can play LW. Also, I read somewhere that Montreal turned down this trade, so who knows how much truth there is to this.

 

I also heard that he was scratched only because Roy wanted to rest him during a busy stretch since he just come back from injury. This makes a bit more sense to me.

 

Rumour came out early that Bergevin turned down an offer that would have brought a Quebecer to the Habs, then it was later announce it was Parenteau, then it was later said it was Bourque. Then it was released that Colorado turned down the offer and not Bergevin. Which made a lot more sense. But bunch of reputated reporters like Reno Lavoie reported it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really liked Parenteau when he was on the Isles, really thought we should've taken a run at signing him when he was UFA.. I don't think it's a matter of him not being in his prime, I think he'd compliment the Devils system well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Parenteau is nice but he's not Merrill or Larsson nice. They'd probably want a prospect or pick or combo and I don't know what we have that would entice them outside if those two and gelinas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

would be cool cause i see this guy all the time downtown at the bar during the summer, had a few chats with him too

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tampa Bay vs Toronto: We want a Lightning win.

Detroit vs Philadelphia: We want a 60 minute game.

Ottawa vs Columbus: We want a 60 minute game.

Washington vs Buffalo: We want a Sabres win.

Carolina vs Montreal: We want a 60 minute game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Figures that the Islanders would blow their lead the instant they get it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mildly rooting the Isles don't tie it cause I don't want it a 3 point game.

 

Blasphemy!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oilers beat the Sharks 3-0 despite being outshot 59-27. Huge performance by Scrivens, he's having a great year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a performance by Scrivens against a great team.  Edmonton apparently doesn't practice defense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently, according to Rangers Report on Twitter (https://twitter.com/rangersreport), a guy in a Brodeur Jersey attended the Rangers-Isles game and got pelted with beverages from fans of both teams.  New Yawka's Unite!

 

I don't know why you'd ever want to go there in a less-than-appreciated jersey.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently, according to Rangers Report on Twitter (https://twitter.com/rangersreport), a guy in a Brodeur Jersey attended the Rangers-Isles game and got pelted with beverages from fans of both teams.  New Yawka's Unite!

 

I wouldn't be surprised of one of them was Linda Cohn from ESPN. ... She was on the Mike and Mike show Monday morning trashing Marty.

Edited by 95Crash

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0