Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Mitico12

shooTOut success or lack thereof?

38 posts in this topic

Parise is a 46% career guy and Kovy is a 39% career guy.

 

Elias and Clowe are both 37% guys.

 

So just comparing those 4 guys, it's not like the Devils had slam dunk goal getters before and the 1 less goal every 20 attempts is the reason things are bad.  We, as Devils fans, are probably just sensitive to this because the Devils were on the good luck side of the shootout in the early years and now we're on the bad luck end of it.

 

Well Kovy was never good until he and Marty had a chat and Marty gave him a trick on the angle to skate towards the goalie or something and since then he was almost scoring every times... look at what he was bringing US in the shootouts and its way more than 46%

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Kovy was never good until he and Marty had a chat and Marty gave him a trick on the angle to skate towards the goalie or something and since then he was almost scoring every times... look at what he was bringing US in the shootouts and its way more than 46%

 

Kovy - 2012-3:  2 for 6 - 33%

 

Kovy had 1 monster shootout season.  Since he wasn't great beforehand and wasn't great in a limited amount of time after I think it's more likely he's a pretty good shootout guy who bunched all his goals together in one monster season, rather than stunk, was ok, learned to be amazing, then forgot most of it and was ok again.

Edited by Devils731

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jesus. It's getting to the point where I'd prefer seeing the moronic Rolston close-your-eyes wind and fire slapshot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

one thing our guys do in the shootout is go in very slow....I wish they would just fly in and rip a shot off

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

one thing our guys do in the shootout is go in very slow....I wish they would just fly in and rip a shot off

 

When Kovy was at his best, that's what he did.  Keeping it simple in the shootout is sometimes the best option.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've always hated the shootout...always will.  Does nothing for me.  I never had a problem with ties, and using some goofy skills competition to decide a "winner" will always be ridiculous to me. 

 

As for the shootout itself...at the least the Devils were among the best at it from its inception through the end of the 2011-12 season.  There are teams who have NEVER been good at it.  But it was hard to think the Devils were going to dominate in it forever.  For one, it's not like the SO ever enters a GM's mind when he's building his team.  Yeah, it was great that guys like Parise happened to be very good at it from the beginning, and that Kovy was lights-out in it in 2011-12, and that Marty was strong at stopping shots in them.

 

But IF Parise wasn't any good at them, and Marty's save% in them was closer to .600 than .700, and many of the other Devils couldn't do much in them, does anyone think Lou is thinking to himself, "Geez, I'd better go find some guys who have a history of success in this thing"?   

 

This is one of many reasons why I don't like the shootout.  When the Devils were good at it, it wasn't like they did anything to make themselves better at it than anyone else...they were just fortunate to have players who had a knack for performing well in them (even friggin' Viktor Kozlov, who was pretty useless otherwise, did a nice job in them as a Devil).  Now it looks like it's going to go the other way for the foreseeable future.  I don't like the shootout because it's an event that's awarding an extra point based on little more than pure luck.  The actual event itself is based on a degree of it, but it's like I've said, if your team isn't inherently good at it, it's not like a GM is going to address that weakness the way he would another.  Have a lousy defense or need scoring?  You can draft players, make trades, or sign free agents to fill specific needs...of course, not all attempts to improve trouble areas produce positive results.  Suck in shootouts?  Oh well.    

 

Used to crack me up when Al Twatwig and the other Ranger homers were making it sound like the Rangers were almost purposely playing for shootouts because Lundqvist happened to be terrific in them, and also seemed to be giving credit to the Rangers for their success in them...as though the Rangers' braintrust had anything to do with the Rags' shootout prowess. 

 

If Lundqvist happened to suck in them (and there are good goalies who don't flourish in shootouts), does anyone think Glen Sather is scouring the league for a guy who's better in them?  No.

 

It's all based on happenstance...if you happen to have players who for whatever the reason(s) get it done in shootouts, you're good at them.  If you don't, you're screwed.  It's not like it's constantly coming up (if you're playing in more than 12 or so a year, that's a lot), but it comes up enough to be noticed. 

 

BTW the Devils still lead in all-time shootout wins (56-38 record) and shooting% (39.2) since in its inception.  They're 3rd in winning%.  Compare that with a team like Florida, who's always been lousy in them (33-56, 24.2 shooting%).  We're just beginning to understand what THAT team's fans have pretty much ALWAYS felt when a shootout is coming. 

Edited by Colorado Rockies 1976

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've always hated the shootout...always will.  Does nothing for me.  I never had a problem with ties, and using some goofy skills competition to decide a "winner" will always be ridiculous to me. 

 

As for the shootout itself...at the least the Devils were among the best at it from its inception through the end of the 2011-12 season.  There are teams who have NEVER been good at it.  But it was hard to think the Devils were going to dominate in it forever.  For one, it's not like the SO ever enters a GM's mind when he's building his team.  Yeah, it was great that guys like Parise happened to be very good at it from the beginning, and that Kovy was lights-out in it in 2011-12, and that Marty was strong at stopping shots in them.

 

But IF Parise wasn't any good at them, and Marty's save% in them was closer to .600 than .700, and many of the other Devils couldn't do much in them, does anyone think Lou is thinking to himself, "Geez, I'd better go find some guys who have a history of success in this thing"?   

 

This is one of many reasons why I don't like the shootout.  When the Devils were good at it, it wasn't like they did anything to make themselves better at it than anyone else...they were just fortunate to have players who had a knack for performing well in them (even friggin' Viktor Kozlov, who was pretty useless otherwise, did a nice job in them as a Devil).  Now it looks like it's going to go the other way for the foreseeable future.  I don't like the shootout because it's an event that's awarding an extra point based on little more than pure luck.  The actual event itself is based on a degree of it, but it's like I've said, if your team isn't inherently good at it, it's not like a GM is going to address that weakness the way he would another.  Have a lousy defense or need scoring?  You can draft players, make trades, or sign free agents to fill specific needs...of course, not all attempts to improve trouble areas produce positive results.  Suck in shootouts?  Oh well.    

 

Used to crack me up when Al Twatwig and the other Ranger homers were making it sound like the Rangers were almost purposely playing for shootouts because Lundqvist happened to be terrific in them, and also seemed to be giving credit to the Rangers for their success in them...as though the Rangers' braintrust had anything to do with the Rags' shootout prowess. 

 

If Lundqvist happened to suck in them (and there are good goalies who don't flourish in shootouts), does anyone think Glen Sather is scouring the league for a guy who's better in them?  No.

 

It's all based on happenstance...if you happen to have players who for whatever the reason(s) get it done in shootouts, you're good at them.  If you don't, you're screwed.  It's not like it's constantly coming up (if you're playing in more than 12 or so a year, that's a lot), but it comes up enough to be noticed. 

 

BTW the Devils still lead in all-time shootout wins (56-38 record) and shooting% (39.2) since in its inception.  They're 3rd in winning%.  Compare that with a team like Florida, who's always been lousy in them (33-56, 24.2 shooting%).  We're just beginning to understand what THAT team's fans have pretty much ALWAYS felt when a shootout is coming. 

Yea I agree, It does kinda suck that a skill contest does end a game, but I still like shootouts for the entertainment value. Nothing feels better than a win and nothing sucks more than a loss in these, but that's what makes them fun to watch. You dont know whats gonna happen. (And that is why we have overtime extended in the playoffs, to keep it from comming down to that.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kovalchuk wasn't good in shootouts until he stole Parise's backhand move.

 

kovalchuk almost never used that. he just shot. that was marty's advice - you're shot is so good, you don't need a deek. come in on proper angle and just make your shot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minute OT.  I'd prefer something like five minutes of 5 on 5, and five minutes of 4 on 4.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wow...the guys are practicing shootouts right now... TG is reporting the results... its horrible

 

Harrold, Olesz, Volchenkov, Clowe only players to score. No one scored twice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wow...the guys are practicing shootouts right now... TG is reporting the results... its horrible

 

Harrold, Olesz, Volchenkov, Clowe only players to score. No one scored twice.

At least none of them tripped over the blue line or injured themselves. It's something to build on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0