Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
devilsrule33

2013-2014 Lineup/Roster Thread

1,544 posts in this topic

I doubt it.  First of all who is giving anything huge up for Larsson?  Second when have the Devils ever given up a guy like Larsson?  It's not like NJ is loaded with young D already in the NHL AND have all these prospects coming - the rest of their D who aren't Larsson, Gelinas, or Merrill are probably an average of 33 years old.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You still have Severson Santini and even Scarlett all proving their worth. I believe Edmonton is stupid enough to trade Yakupov for Larsson. There are only so many minutes to go around.

 

 New Jersey are pretty bare up front. I'd rather trade him for a center but pure goal scorers are hard to come across as well.

Edited by Jas0nMacIsaac

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You still have Severson Santini and even Scarlett all proving their worth. I believe Edmonton is stupid enough to trade Yakupov for Larsson.

 

I don't think the Devils would do that.  At least, I wouldn't do that if I were the Devils.  I think Yakupov is going to be a very good player (I'm not convinced he'll be a dominant player), but he would have the Devils over a barrel when it comes to contract negotiations.  Don't like being in that position.  If he were signed long-term then I'd do it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the Isle's need veteran D help, and the Oilers were looking to upgrade their D

I wonder if Larry Robinson would make a pitch to SJ management to go after Larsson? but I don't see Lou trading Adam unless he ask's for a trade like Billy Guerin did back in the 90's

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Larsson for Yak would be a historically bad move. The kid has major attitude problems and problems with the coach up in Edmonton.

He's a floater, how do you think he'd respond to PDB forcing him to play D?

He'd be in the KHL in 2 years, tops.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Larsson for Yak would be a historically bad move. The kid has major attitude problems and problems with the coach up in Edmonton.

He's a floater, how do you think he'd respond to PDB forcing him to play D?

He'd be in the KHL in 2 years, tops.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

I agree...id rather keep Larsson.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a feeling Larsson will be included in a blockbuster trade.

 

That would be a mistake.

Gelinas and Larsson are both RFA's this season as well.

 

I hope Lou locks both up long term.  Lou values franchise defensemen greatly, so I think he will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lou looks for ways to improve this team via trades, he clearly see's we lack offense....he also knows how much defense we have building up.......I could see him move D for O, and that could include just about anyone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's not go super-bananas over our sudden depth at D and do something silly like, oh, trade the one who's probably the best of the bunch. You have Gelinas who has had a good few months, Merrill has had 2-3 good games and the rest? Albany and junior players. 

 

But hey let's trade Jagr too because we've got Boucher looking good in the minors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's not go super-bananas over our sudden depth at D and do something silly like, oh, trade the one who's probably the best of the bunch. You have Gelinas who has had a good few months, Merrill has had 2-3 good games and the rest? Albany and junior players. 

 

But hey let's trade Jagr too because we've got Boucher looking good in the minors.

These prospects are not just junior players, one is among the top defensmen in the CHL and almost certain to play a large role for Team Canada and the other could be the best defensmen on team USA at the age of 18. If Larsson can get us a top line player for the next 8 years then yes I would trade him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How many times have you seen a quote like this out of PD.

 

“I though Jon played a hell of a game,” DeBoer said. “We’ll go over some teaching points with him as we go forward, but I thought he gave us a great game tonight. He was very reliable, safe, moved pucks, created some offense. I thought he was very good.”

 

He did all this on his offside as a first year pro. This kid will be better than Larsson if he isn't already.

Edited by Jas0nMacIsaac

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These prospects are not just junior players, one is among the top defensmen in the CHL and almost certain to play a large role for Team Canada and the other could be the best defensmen on team USA at the age of 18. If Larsson can get us a top line player for the next 8 years then yes I would trade him.

 

While I'm as optimistic as the next guy regarding our prospects and farm system, they are just that. Bigger prospects and more touted ones have failed to blossom and they aren't in the bigs yet.

 

Edit: as for the quote, PDB hates Swedes. We all know that.

Edited by Marshall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Greene, Larsson, Merrill, and Gelinas have the potential to be a great defensive corp.  But I'm getting ahead of myself there.   I want to include Fayne in that group as well, but we all know how Pete treats him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a few D men Lou has traded in the past, many of them young and expected to be a part of the teams future, others were just good reliable D men. I remember when these guys were traded, many fans were like.. why the hell did he trade that guy.

David HaleMike Commodore. Willie Mitchell, Brad Bombardir, Sheldon Souray, Jason Smith, Cale Hulse, Tommy Albelin, Eric Weinrich, Craig Wolanin, Tom Kurvers, Joe Cirella, 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I'm as optimistic as the next guy regarding our prospects and farm system, they are just that. Bigger prospects and more touted ones have failed to blossom and they aren't in the bigs yet.

 

Edit: as for the quote, PDB hates Swedes. We all know that.

These guys aren't the types to completely fall off the map, they will play in the NHL in some role. Both are big mobile, physical defenders that excel on the PK. Severson is Salvador type physical while Santini is more in the Stevens mold.

Edited by Jas0nMacIsaac

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a few D men Lou has traded in the past, many of them young and expected to be a part of the teams future, others were just good reliable D men. I remember when these guys were traded, many fans were like.. why the hell did he trade that guy.

David HaleMike Commodore. Willie Mitchell, Brad Bombardir, Sheldon Souray, Jason Smith, Cale Hulse, Tommy Albelin, Eric Weinrich, Craig Wolanin, Tom Kurvers, Joe Cirella, 

 

It's not a matter of what we think.  It's what Lou thinks.  If Lou thinks a dman is gonna be a franchise dman, he won't trade them unless it's a massive overpayment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not a matter of what we think.  It's what Lou thinks.  If Lou thinks a dman is gonna be a franchise dman, he won't trade them unless it's a massive overpayment.

No kidding...and all these years I thought it was the fans that made the trades...wow

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These prospects are not just junior players, one is among the top defensmen in the CHL and almost certain to play a large role for Team Canada and the other could be the best defensmen on team USA at the age of 18. If Larsson can get us a top line player for the next 8 years then yes I would trade him.

Like Tri said, I don't think others value Larsson quite as highly as we do. I think he's pretty much guaranteed to be a top pairing guy, but he hasn't shown AS MUCH as guys like Brodin and Hamilton.

 

Larsson, Gelinas and Merrill are all going to be at least decent NHLers. 

 

Severson is about as close to a slam dunk as there is

 

Santini is having a fantastic start

 

Scarlett and Helgeson are playing very well in Albany.

 

Devils certainly have an embarrassment of riches on defense, but I think it'd be a mistake to give up on one of the three guys in the NHL ATM.  I love Severson and he could certainly end up the best of the bunch, but I would move him before Larsson, Gelinas and Merrill. I wish we could keep them all, but there is no way NJ doesn't do a lateral move for help up front

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like Tri said, I don't think others value Larsson quite as highly as we do. I think he's pretty much guaranteed to be a top pairing guy, but he hasn't shown AS MUCH as guys like Brodin and Hamilton.

 

Larsson, Gelinas and Merrill are all going to be at least decent NHLers. 

 

Severson is about as close to a slam dunk as there is

 

Santini is having a fantastic start

 

Scarlett and Helgeson are playing very well in Albany.

 

Devils certainly have an embarrassment of riches on defense, but I think it'd be a mistake to give up on one of the three guys in the NHL ATM.  I love Severson and he could certainly end up the best of the bunch, but I would move him before Larsson, Gelinas and Merrill. I wish we could keep them all, but there is no way NJ doesn't do a lateral move for help up front

That could include Lou Lams, maybe he see's the development of our other young D men and would consider moving Larsson  IF  the right deal was in place

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Greene, Larsson, Merrill, and Gelinas have the potential to be a great defensive corp.  But I'm getting ahead of myself there.   I want to include Fayne in that group as well, but we all know how Pete treats him.

out of greene larsson and gelinas, fayne is the weakest link i think.. i cant say merrill he hasnt been around here long enough and is too new i hope the first three i mentioned get resigned i would hate to see andy greene not be with us any more hes defiently a top D man for us right and i know is contract is up soon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

out of greene larsson and gelinas, fayne is the weakest link i think.. i cant say merrill he hasnt been around here long enough and is too new i hope the first three i mentioned get resigned i would hate to see andy greene not be with us any more hes defiently a top D man for us right and i know is contract is up soon

Greene is from Michigan, maybe Lou can work out a deal with the Wings, send Brunner back with Andy!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Greene is from Michigan, maybe Lou can work out a deal with the Wings, send Brunner back with Andy!

lol they sure could have brunner back but the way hes been i dont think we would really be able to move him... who would want him hes been useless.. and greene i really wouldnt be willing to part with .. they can have zids lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lol they sure could have brunner back but the way hes been i dont think we would really be able to move him... who would want him hes been useless.. and greene i really wouldnt be willing to part with .. they can have zids lol

yeah Zids and Fayne are UFA after this season...I could see Lou trading one them this season

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0