Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Neb00rs

NHL Franchise Values (Per Forbes)

20 posts in this topic

ughhh i figured the rags would be towards the top of the list.. while we are probably towards the bottom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Neboors, not trying to be a dick, but not sure what made you think those valuations from that site were anything close to being factual. Just look at those numbers. The Devils were sold for $320 million last year, which according to this would make them as valuable as the Bruins and top 5 or 6 teams in the league?

 

Some of the numbers posted there are probably half of what the teams are worth if they were to be sold. I'd say most of the teams in the league would be sold for more than what they think the Blackhawks are worth.

 

This guy has the Leafs at just over $500 million. MLSE had 75% of their stake (the most important part is the Leafs) sell for $1.3 billion.

Edited by devilsrule33

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Neboors, not trying to be a dick, but not sure what made you think those valuations from that site were anything close to being factual. Just look at those numbers. The Devils were sold for $320 million last year, which according to this would make them as valuable as the Bruins and top 5 or 5 in the league?

 

Some of the numbers posted there are probably half of what the teams are worth if they were to be sold. I'd say most of the teams in the league would be sold for more than what they think the Blackhawks are worth.

 

No offense taken. It's based on Forbes valuations so it's a credible article, if you disagree with the values than that's exactly the kind of debate that should be had in this thread (NJDevs is often good for dispelling poor journalism and the reason people post things here all the time). It's the summer, it's a recent topical article, I posted it to stir up some conversation and see what others, such as yourself, have to say. It's worth a post imo.

 

http://www.forbes.com/pictures/ffeh45ekdk/1-toronto-maple-leafs/

Edited by Neb00rs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm, that is weird. Perhaps the more recent article isn't including the value of stadiums or some other detail?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Neboors, not trying to be a dick, but not sure what made you think those valuations from that site were anything close to being factual. Just look at those numbers. The Devils were sold for $320 million last year, which according to this would make them as valuable as the Bruins and top 5 or 5 in the league?

 

Some of the numbers posted there are probably half of what the teams are worth if they were to be sold. I'd say most of the teams in the league would be sold for more than what they think the Blackhawks are worth.

 

This guy has the Leafs at just over $500 million. MLSE had 75% of their stake (the most important part is the Leafs) sold for $1.3 billion.

Point well taken. However, I think the Prudential Center revenue outside of the Devils was a huge factor in the acquisition as well as the final purchase price.

 

Just to underscore this point, here's this:

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/12/prudential_center_joins_list_o.html

 

NEWARK — The Prudential Center in Newark has joined Madison Square Garden, the Staples Center in Los Angeles and the O2 Arena in London as being among the top 10 grossing arenas in the world.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What would be your calculations?

 

We have this debate every time Forbes comes out with numbers.  They're terrible, always.  They clearly have a formula based on certain things that doesn't take a lot of other stuff into account.  If they don't reflect what franchises actually sell for, what purpose do they have?

 

Agree with mort that the arena is the valuable thing in the sale of the Devils and not the franchise itself, but still.  The franchise and arena go together.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have this debate every time Forbes comes out with numbers.  They're terrible, always.  They clearly have a formula based on certain things that doesn't take a lot of other stuff into account.  If they don't reflect what franchises actually sell for, what purpose do they have?

 

Agree with mort that the arena is the valuable thing in the sale of the Devils and not the franchise itself, but still.  The franchise and arena go together.

 

Nonetheless there's still the question of why they are so much lower than last year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My rule of thumb- any website that forces you through a countdown slideshow is just trawling for clicks. Half the time they have no idea what the heck they're putting on there, they just want people to click through.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The team sold last year for $320 million. That is the minimum value of the franchise because, as Tri already said, the arena is tied to the team at the moment. When you factor in the new NHL TV money each team will be receiving, it is only likely that the value of the franchise would have increased slightly, or at the very least stayed the same since last years sale.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This debate goes beyond Forbes, too - whenever you have a proprietary formula for something and it spits out numbers that don't make sense, you will catch flak when they are way off.  Nate Silver's learning that lesson.  

Edited by Triumph

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nonetheless there's still the question of why they are so much lower than last year.

 

Honestly, I have no clue when that link is from that this guy wrote some crummy blurbs off of. It has no year, and doesn't include much information. The photos look fairly new, but as far as I know, Forbes hasn't come out with their 2014 list. They usually do that in-season.

 

 

http://www.forbes.com/nhl-valuations/

Edited by devilsrule33

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, Forbes has been going down the tubes in credibility. I'll believe the rankings that a paper like Wall Street Journal reports later this year over a click-bait article by Forbes. They're simply not a credible source anymore but are only somewhat viewed that way because of their name.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, I have no clue when that link is from that this guy wrote some crummy blurbs off of. It has no year, and doesn't include much information. The photos look fairly new, but as far as I know, Forbes hasn't come out with their 2014 list. They usually do that in-season.

 

 

http://www.forbes.com/nhl-valuations/

 

I posted the direct link to Forbes at the top a few days ago. That's where the guy got it from.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I posted the direct link to Forbes at the top a few days ago. That's where the guy got it from.

 

I got it, but those don't have a date on it. Nowhere on Forbes site does it say the 2014 team valuations are up. It also doesn't make any sense that all of last year's values (accurate or not) would be cut in half by Forbes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got it, but those don't have a date on it. Nowhere on Forbes site does it say the 2014 team valuations are up. It also doesn't make any sense that all of last year's values (accurate or not) would be cut in half by Forbes.

Forbes also has traditionally released their numbers around Thanksgiving

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0