Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Zubie#8

Andy Greene Signed +5 years @ $5M Per Season

155 posts in this topic

Harrold is pretty capable so him getting a few games isn't the end of the world. I'd bet Severson is the first in line to get called up, though.

 

Yeah Harrold is definitely our #7 guy and I guess it depends on who gets injured as to who they call up. Do you really see Severson getting ice time this season? I would have thought he'd get at least a year in Albany but I guess if he's that good why not? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How are the Devils going to get forwards? Once Elias and Jagr retire, the Devils have no top line offensive talent. They will constantly have to acquire forwards by UFA like they have with Clowe and Cammelleri. Very hard to get good forwards in free agency without paying a sh!t ton. 

 

Matteau, Queneville and Boucher has to be the worst group of forward prospects that any team in the NHL has. The Devils will be paying a lot for offense for years to come.

 

There are only so many forwards that are available in free agency in any given year, and we're never really in the conversation for any of the really high priced ones.  The fact that there are more slots to fill won't really change the way Lou has always approached it.   Whatever the case, in six years, the $5 million that Greene will be getting paid, which might be a little bit above what an average player gets, is not going to make a difference on who the forwards ultimately are. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are only so many forwards that are available in free agency in any given year, and we're never really in the conversation for any of the really high priced ones.  The fact that there are more slots to fill won't really change the way Lou has always approached it.   Whatever the case, in six years, the $5 million that Greene will be getting paid, which might be a little bit above what an average player gets, is not going to make a difference on who the forwards ultimately are. 

 

I don't know I think Cammy was a pretty big land. Plus if you believe him we were in on Zach before he chose to go home. I won't say Kovy because I think we were the only ones offering him 100 million. Zidlicky and Jagr weren't too bad either.

 

For a couple of years there it felt like no one wanted to play for us but I think that was just a dark period in our time. Zach, Kovy, and Clarkson all left within a year or two. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know I think Cammy was a pretty big land. Plus if you believe him we were in on Zach before he chose to go home. I won't say Kovy because I think we were the only ones offering him 100 million. Zidlicky and Jagr weren't too bad either.

 

For a couple of years there it felt like no one wanted to play for us but I think that was just a dark period in our time. Zach, Kovy, and Clarkson all left within a year or two. 

 

It's not an issue of no one wanting to play here.  And Kovy is an outlier that very well may have been all of Vanderbeek's doing.  Other than that, Lou's approach to free agency is to target certain players that fill needs, and not just going after the biggest fish that's out there for it's own sake.

 

Otherwise, to clarify what I was saying earlier, while no one knows what will happen in the next five years, it does look like we'll be very thin at forward and that there will be a need to overpay in free agency for the Clowes, Cammalleris and Ryders of the world.  It's just that Greene's contract at that point isn't going to impact how good or bad the forwards will be by then.  True, Merrill, Gelinas and Larsson might be getting huge pay days at that point.  If that's the case, and you don't have the cap space to sign all three of them, it means you have three extremely good defensemen that are in the prime of their careers. 

Edited by Daniel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know I think Cammy was a pretty big land. Plus if you believe him we were in on Zach before he chose to go home. I won't say Kovy because I think we were the only ones offering him 100 million. Zidlicky and Jagr weren't too bad either.

 

For a couple of years there it felt like no one wanted to play for us but I think that was just a dark period in our time. Zach, Kovy, and Clarkson all left within a year or two. 

 

Additionally, Rolston was considered a big win when we signed him. He was coming off 3 straight 30 goal seasons and supposedly had 14 offers. Ended up being terrible, but at the time he was a big signing. Ryder was also one of the better FA's available last summer. Again, not looking at actual results of those signings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lou made me laugh in this interview about the Greene signing.  A guy asked about the lengths of Greene and Schneider contracts and then brought up Kovalchuck and Lou said, "Hey look, I just ate lunch and I had a great taste in the meal I had."  Lou is such a comic.  He pretty much ignored the question.  :koolaid: :koolaid: :koolaid:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not an issue of no one wanting to play here.  And Kovy is an outlier that very well may have been all of Vanderbeek's doing.  Other than that, Lou's approach to free agency is to target certain players that fill needs, and not just going after the biggest fish that's out there for it's own sake.

 

Otherwise, to clarify what I was saying earlier, while no one knows what will happen in the next five years, it does look like we'll be very thin at forward and that there will be a need to overpay in free agency for the Clowes, Cammalleris and Ryders of the world.  It's just that Greene's contract at that point isn't going to impact how good or bad the forwards will be by then.  True, Merrill, Gelinas and Larsson might be getting huge pay days at that point.  If that's the case, and you don't have the cap space to sign all three of them, it means you have three extremely good defensemen that are in the prime of their careers. 

 

The Devils aren't in the conversation for the biggest player because for years they already had good players.  They had Parise, Elias, Gomez, Gionta, etc.  The goal was to surround those players with decent depth.  Then they got Kovalchuk.  Soon it's going to be Henrique, Zajac, an aging Cammalleri, maybe Boucher, and a lot of question marks.  The Devils won't just be able to patch holes with mid-range free agents - they will need to be involved for the best players, because the best players aren't walking in otherwise.

 

Again, they're spending $45M on forwards and that's with Jagr being a giant bargain what with him being the best one and being paid less than Zajac.  When Jagr goes, how much do you think they'll have to spend on the guy that replaces him?  How about the person who replaces Elias?  I'd say $13M per season is a good estimate for that.  What Merrill, Gelinas, and Larsson turn into is sort of immaterial here - Larsson will be paid a lot of money on his next contract unless he really tanks this year, and Gelinas figures to be paid a lot since he'll score some points.  If Merrill, Gelinas, and Larsson aren't any good then the team is screwed regardless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Devils aren't in the conversation for the biggest player because for years they already had good players.  They had Parise, Elias, Gomez, Gionta, etc.  The goal was to surround those players with decent depth.  Then they got Kovalchuk.  Soon it's going to be Henrique, Zajac, an aging Cammalleri, maybe Boucher, and a lot of question marks.  The Devils won't just be able to patch holes with mid-range free agents - they will need to be involved for the best players, because the best players aren't walking in otherwise.

 

Again, they're spending $45M on forwards and that's with Jagr being a giant bargain what with him being the best one and being paid less than Zajac.  When Jagr goes, how much do you think they'll have to spend on the guy that replaces him?  How about the person who replaces Elias?  I'd say $13M per season is a good estimate for that.  What Merrill, Gelinas, and Larsson turn into is sort of immaterial here - Larsson will be paid a lot of money on his next contract unless he really tanks this year, and Gelinas figures to be paid a lot since he'll score some points.  If Merrill, Gelinas, and Larsson aren't any good then the team is screwed regardless.

 

This may all be true, but whatever you're paying Greene in five or six years from now won't really impact who the forwards end up being.

 

We're also talking about what will be six years from now.  There are three forwards on the team that were in the organization six years ago, and, so far as I can tell, no one else is someone that was acquired for someone else that was in the organization at that time.  It's kind of a fun exercise to think about I suppose, but it just doesn't have much to do with Andy Greene.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This may all be true, but whatever you're paying Greene in five or six years from now won't really impact who the forwards end up being.

 

We're also talking about what will be six years from now.  There are three forwards on the team that were in the organization six years ago, and, so far as I can tell, no one else is someone that was acquired for someone else that was in the organization at that time.  It's kind of a fun exercise to think about I suppose, but it just doesn't have much to do with Andy Greene.

 

I don't really agree, but we'll leave it at that.  The defense will not be cheap forever, and the only way this team turns back into a consistent playoff team is with cheap defense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really agree, but we'll leave it at that.  The defense will not be cheap forever, and the only way this team turns back into a consistent playoff team is with cheap defense.

By the time the defense won't be cheap, Elias, Zubrus, Ruutu and hopefully Clowe will be gone. Then you have guys like Santini and Severson who will be inexpensive.  Having 2 dmen on ELCs is probably uncommon and that can very easily be the case in 4 years when Larsson, Gelinas and Merrill will be getting paid

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rather Greene at 5 then Brooks Orpik at 5 plus

green much more versatile than Orpik. Brooks hasn't had PP time in his entire career. he's a shutdown guy. then again, so is Andy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am happy Greene is going to be here for 5 more years, but I was hoping Lou was going to say he made a trade of some kind.  IMO Devils need to make one more move in this off season

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All you guys should spend as much time worrying about your retirement funding as you spend on the Devils in 5-6 years! In all probability Lou will not still be around, although I would not want odds that he might even be behind the bench for some games in 2019-20. The new owners will have had the opportunity to establish themselves by then. Who knows what the Devils will look like? Anyway, Lou has ALWAYS built the team from the goal-line out. If offense = Stanley Cup the TB Lightining would have more than one Cup in their trophy bin.

 

MY point is, take one season at a time, and enjoy it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Greene should be wearing the "C" he deserves it. And put the "A's" on Zajac and Henrique.

 

Elias should keep his until he retires. Otherwise I agree with the above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Greene should be wearing the "C" he deserves it. And put the "A's" on Zajac and Henrique.

why would you take the A from elias.. not that hes going to lose it but i would like to see greene get the C zajac get the other A and elias is obviously keeping his

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologize, ment when Elias is retired, should have been more specific.

why would you take the A from elias.. not that hes going to lose it but i would like to see greene get the C zajac get the other A and elias is obviously keeping his

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

subban taked 9KK

 

do you think subban>=2xGreen-1KK?

Edited by Guadana

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

subban taked 9KK

 

do you think subban>=2xGreen-1KK?

 

If Greene were the same age then no. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Greene were the same age then no. 

 

Of course when Greene actually was Subban's age he was an unproven scrub that was frequently scratched by Sutter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Greene should be - emphasis on should - a bigger bargain in year 1 of his contract than Subban is in year 1 of his.  But Subban should be a bargain in year 8 of his deal, whereas Greene will not be a bargain in the final year of his deal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

capgeek says the Greene contract has a full no-trade clause.

That's not surprising. A veteran type player signing what may possibly be his last contract frequently gets that respect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0