Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
MissionHockey

Trade Proposal

46 posts in this topic

i remember legwand having like a 99 potential rating in i think nhl 2002 :)

How much is Rafalski making a season? I think he is worth every penny; I would rather see Gomez go than him, but hopefully we can keep both, and Gionta.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
first off thornton isn't comparable to gomez. thornton had more assists than gomez had points. By gomez's age thornton already had a 100 point season in the old NHL

so gomez being better all around, while also being around 3 years older means that he is worth a defensively average 100 point center?

so only staal took advantage of the rules at the begining of the season? that means every other player who put up a large amount of points didn't take advantage of that? what did gomez just decide "i feel bad for the refs i won't pad my stats!"

so staal also plays in an offensive system? he also didn't have sergei brylin and zach parise as the following centers.

I would reply but it would just be an echo of his statements.

Keep in mind, this is only if NJ absolutely has to trade Gomez. This package is better than what Edm got for Pronger, and worlds better than what Ottawa got for Havlat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Legwand sounds like a dyck

:giggle:

get it? :giggle:

you always make me smile pk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would reply but it would just be an echo of his statements.

Keep in mind, this is only if NJ absolutely has to trade Gomez. This package is better than what Edm got for Pronger, and worlds better than what Ottawa got for Havlat.

No it isn't. Legwand's UFA in a year.

I don't like the trade as it addresses none of our needs, creates a gaping hole at 1st line center, and basically destroys our offense since Gionta is dependent on Gomez. Last year was a fluke for him - you take Gomez out of this offense and Gionta's a 30 goal scorer.

I think the Devils will waive Jason Wiemer, they will trade Sergei Brylin, Vladimir Malakhov, and Alexander Mogilny, and they'll have room to sign the 2nd line center they need, if they can find him on the open market.

I can't remember the last time Lou traded for a prospect in a deal like this - usually he's adding one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would reply but it would just be an echo of his statements.

Keep in mind, this is only if NJ absolutely has to trade Gomez. This package is better than what Edm got for Pronger, and worlds better than what Ottawa got for Havlat.

my point, with the names i tossed out there, was that gomer is a #1 center, behind him we have nothing better than a mediocre #3 and some hope for a couple of guys that may some day develop into solid #2's (if parise was a solid #1 candidate he would have shown us more last season - i'm not counting him out, but based on his rookie year, i'm projecting solid #2 for him, and after him, prospects are just that, "prospects", until they suit up and bring it to the nhl level, you can't know what they'll be (see past top 5 pick busts that are too numerous to list out))

So, by throwing out the names I threw out there, I was basically saying we need a home run deal in order to part with gomer - and it would be a net zero or negative payroll impact then, not to mention that none of those guys mentioned, or other comparables, are on the auction block to begin with.

SO, it means you deal with arbitration, pay gomer what you're told to for the one year, and six months from now when your allowed to renegotiate the deal with him (Jan. '07 I believe) you lock him up for 5 years - If you can't do so before the trade deadline, then you may have to consider moving him since he could walk away, although, we certainly ran that risk with Patty this summer and although I fully believed he was a gonner, here he is in Red and Black for his career.

Basically, you trade away whoever you have to in order to make enough room for gomer to feed elias for the next 5 years. If that means gio goes, well, so be it. If it means pando, oh well. Brylin? hey, a devil for the history books, but you know what, if he ain't got the ability to put up 50 or more helpers in a season, it's time to move along.

Like someone else said, we can't keep rolling out 3 lines of guys who just plod along. Gomer has speed and hands and puck carrying/passing skills that we absolutely need in this day and age. I'd hate to put this out there, but I'd be more willing to give up Maddog, and try to shore up the defense and get a cheaper pk specialist, than I would be willing to give up gomer and his offensive potential in this new NHL.

Besides, gomer has a great attitude and is always good for an entertaining interview - he's one of very few personalities on this team now that dano retired and Jim McKenzie went away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

btw, Pronger is overrated and the deal for Havlet actually looks pretty good for Ottawa considering their roster and pipeline of talent coming through the system. You've got to consider the difference between any NJ deal involving Gomer and Ottawa doing anything with their forwards - NJ would be dealing from a position of weakness, Ottawa was dealing from a position of Stregnth. So they give up havlet, they still have spezza, alfredson, heatley and about 4 other guys who have shown an outstanding ability to put the puck in the net/on the sticks of others who put the puck in the net. NJ has about 3 of that type of player, and you're proposing trading one of them - ouch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No it isn't. Legwand's UFA in a year.

I don't like the trade as it addresses none of our needs, creates a gaping hole at 1st line center, and basically destroys our offense since Gionta is dependent on Gomez. Last year was a fluke for him - you take Gomez out of this offense and Gionta's a 30 goal scorer.

I think the Devils will waive Jason Wiemer, they will trade Sergei Brylin, Vladimir Malakhov, and Alexander Mogilny, and they'll have room to sign the 2nd line center they need, if they can find him on the open market.

I can't remember the last time Lou traded for a prospect in a deal like this - usually he's adding one.

The idea is not to get a player who is a legitimate 1st line center, but somebody who wouldn't look out of place for the time being. The Devils would be EXTREMELY lucky if they can add another player at all, much less a second line center. Legwand only makes 1.5 million, and is doubtful that he would get a much higher raise. Plus he does have offensive skills. I truly believe the Devils can survive this season with somebody like Legwand centering Elias.

The other players I had in mind were Kyle Calder and Jarret Stoll.

my point, with the names i tossed out there, was that gomer is a #1 center, behind him we have nothing better than a mediocre #3 and some hope for a couple of guys that may some day develop into solid #2's (if parise was a solid #1 candidate he would have shown us more last season - i'm not counting him out, but based on his rookie year, i'm projecting solid #2 for him, and after him, prospects are just that, "prospects", until they suit up and bring it to the nhl level, you can't know what they'll be (see past top 5 pick busts that are too numerous to list out))

Which is exactly why the Devils need a center in return for the trade. Nobody will give up a player with the calibur of Gomez, especially with the bind we are in moneywise. Parise and Brylin might be able to pull off playing the 2nd line center.

So, by throwing out the names I threw out there, I was basically saying we need a home run deal in order to part with gomer - and it would be a net zero or negative payroll impact then, not to mention that none of those guys mentioned, or other comparables, are on the auction block to begin with.

But don't you see that no homerun deal will be coming? It would be a different situation if the Devils were in such bad shape capwise, Gomez would probably be untouchable, but thats just not the era the Devils are in now.

SO, it means you deal with arbitration, pay gomer what you're told to for the one year, and six months from now when your allowed to renegotiate the deal with him (Jan. '07 I believe) you lock him up for 5 years - If you can't do so before the trade deadline, then you may have to consider moving him since he could walk away, although, we certainly ran that risk with Patty this summer and although I fully believed he was a gonner, here he is in Red and Black for his career.

1. Gomez is not Elias. The Devils organization was very loyal and supportive of Patrik when he was in a time of need. It is my personal opinion that he felt he owed them something.

2. I would think that if Gomez doesn't get a long term contract now, he is almost certain to test the FA waters next offseason. When some dumb bloke GM could blow him away with a 7million dollar offer, in which case the Devils might even walk away from him.

Like someone else said, we can't keep rolling out 3 lines of guys who just plod along. Gomer has speed and hands and puck carrying/passing skills that we absolutely need in this day and age. I'd hate to put this out there, but I'd be more willing to give up Maddog, and try to shore up the defense and get a cheaper pk specialist, than I would be willing to give up gomer and his offensive potential in this new NHL.

I understand that the way Gomez breaks the trap makes life a hell of a lot easier. I wouldn't say he's an expendable asset, but at the same time I just don't think its the most vital. NJ might be one of the only teams in the league where the "3rd line" is more valuable than the first. They play the most minutes. I don't think we can afford giving up Madden with out a huge drop in the standings.

Gomez is my favorite player next to Elias, but I just don't think the money is there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Giving up Madden is impossible - Mission's right. That's a *huge* hole - it'd be hard to find another guy who could play 20 minutes.

Legwand would look out of place. He's not very good. He was drafted #2 overall - that's about it. He'll be 26, and has had 3 30 assist seasons and no seasons with more than 20 goals. He's a marginal 2nd line center who is injury-prone - he'll probably have to re-invent himself a la Rob Niedermayer to be a valued member of a decent squad.

As rdbf very acutely noted, Ottawa is dealing Havlat from a position of strength - they won the Conference basically without him, so I think the Havlat comparison is unwarranted. The Devils have nothing even close to Gomez. My point here is that the Devils are already weak down the center - to deal a center and get a worse one back makes a bad situation worse. If the Devils are going to make this kind of move they should consider dealing Brian Rafalski - but I don't think they will because that's almost equally as foolish. They will find a taker for Malakhov and/or Mogilny's contract, and when they do, they will actually be in quite a good cap situation all things considered.

I feel fairly confident that Lou L. would not lock up Jamie Langenbrunner at 5/14.5 if he thought he would have to deal Gomez. If we were to deal Gomez, I'd much rather have us do it in a Pronger to Anaheim way where we get a very solid prospect back, as well another mid-range prospect, rather than get a guy who won't be in New Jersey in a year anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't like the trade as it addresses none of our needs, creates a gaping hole at 1st line center, and basically destroys our offense since Gionta is dependent on Gomez. Last year was a fluke for him - you take Gomez out of this offense and Gionta's a 30 goal scorer.

I don't think so. Lines were being shuffled nightly earlier in the year. Gionta produced with whoever he was paired with - whether it was Parise, Kozlov, or Gomez. Gomez pretty much sucked until late December, while Gionta was carrying the team. Obviously he benefits from being with Gomer, but he would certainly be more than a 30 goal scorer without him.

Edited by Voros19

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't think so. Lines were being shuffled nightly earlier in the year. Gionta produced with whoever he was paired with - whether it was Parise, Kozlov, or Gomez. Gomez pretty much sucked until late December, while Gionta was carrying the team. Obviously he benefits from being with Gomer, but he would certainly be more than a 30 goal scorer without him.

That was the fluke part of it. Gionta is not a 40 goal scorer 'on his own'. He succeeded when the rules were most tight, and he was on a hot streak as well - got a lot of bounces during that stretch.

I'd put the O/U of Gionta's goals this season at 39 pro-rated (minimum 25 games).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Lou trades Gomez, hes sure as heck going to get more in return than Legwand and a defense prospect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Giving up Madden is impossible - Mission's right. That's a *huge* hole - it'd be hard to find another guy who could play 20 minutes.

Legwand would look out of place. He's not very good. He was drafted #2 overall - that's about it. He'll be 26, and has had 3 30 assist seasons and no seasons with more than 20 goals. He's a marginal 2nd line center who is injury-prone - he'll probably have to re-invent himself a la Rob Niedermayer to be a valued member of a decent squad.

As rdbf very acutely noted, Ottawa is dealing Havlat from a position of strength - they won the Conference basically without him, so I think the Havlat comparison is unwarranted. The Devils have nothing even close to Gomez. My point here is that the Devils are already weak down the center - to deal a center and get a worse one back makes a bad situation worse. If the Devils are going to make this kind of move they should consider dealing Brian Rafalski - but I don't think they will because that's almost equally as foolish. They will find a taker for Malakhov and/or Mogilny's contract, and when they do, they will actually be in quite a good cap situation all things considered.

I feel fairly confident that Lou L. would not lock up Jamie Langenbrunner at 5/14.5 if he thought he would have to deal Gomez. If we were to deal Gomez, I'd much rather have us do it in a Pronger to Anaheim way where we get a very solid prospect back, as well another mid-range prospect, rather than get a guy who won't be in New Jersey in a year anyway.

The whole point of the deal is that Legwand is temporary. Next year when the Devils have tons of cap space they can sign another center. I whole heartedly believe that Legwand could produce 60 points playing with the Devils, then the Devils can let him go and look for an upgrade during the offseason. Hell, if Gomez only signs a one year deal, they can go back and get him! You made a good point about Langenbrunner which I had never thought of.

Jarret Stoll also had 68 points with Edm, and will probably get 2 million from the arbitrator. He is another option.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The whole point of the deal is that Legwand is temporary. Next year when the Devils have tons of cap space they can sign another center. I whole heartedly believe that Legwand could produce 60 points playing with the Devils, then the Devils can let him go and look for an upgrade during the offseason. Hell, if Gomez only signs a one year deal, they can go back and get him! You made a good point about Langenbrunner which I had never thought of.

Jarret Stoll also had 68 points with Edm, and will probably get 2 million from the arbitrator. He is another option.

You dont make trades for the sake of making trades.

Gomez is far more valuable to the Devils than Stoll or Legwand would or ever could be and I fully believe that Gomez is worth more in trade value than them both, especially Legwand.

While I have been critical of Gomez at times, he is a supremely talented player and is held in high regard by many GMs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You dont make trades for the sake of making trades.

Gomez is far more valuable to the Devils than Stoll or Legwand would or ever could be and I fully believe that Gomez is worth more in trade value than them both, especially Legwand.

While I have been critical of Gomez at times, he is a supremely talented player and is held in high regard by many GMs.

When did I say I was making this trade just to make a trade?? I missed that part of the post.

That is all pre-cap thinking, if you want to understand this thread then re-read my post. I'm tired of explaining it again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about neither.

There is no need to worry about any of this until we know that Lou has run into a wall and must attempt trades of our most skilled/highest paid guys. That is a last resort, not a first. NO ONE here knows what other moves or loopholes lou knows could get us out of the bind, so why bother contemplating the absolute worst possible sacrifices at all, and especially first?

Edited by elias2600

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Legwand will never be a #1 center. He's the ultimate tease. Has the talent, but he'll never live up to his expectations when he was drafted. Plus he's coming off major reconstrucive surgery.

Not a good deal at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would you trade away Gomez, who puts up solid offensive numbers, and has finally shown the ability to create and score in the same breath for a bonafide disappointment in Legwand??

Oh, hes only temporary? Even worse...........

This whole idea is nonsensical.

If it aint broke, dont fix it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0