Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Verran12

NHL rumored to be Back on ESPN

85 posts in this topic

Ecklund sucks....just throwing that out there :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ecklund sucks....just throwing that out there :D

Thank You. Its as if people are forgetting the source of this. :blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If espn would give Hockey a show like baseball tonight and show more than just the games with crosby and ovechkin then this would be great.

IF.

But its ESPN so they won't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
IF.

But its ESPN so they won't.

they did have a show it was called NHL 2Nite IIRC .. i would imagine they would bring it back if the NHL were to get back to broadcasting on ESPN.

Edited by nmigliore

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
they did have a show it was called NHL 2Nite IIRC .. i would imagine they would bring it back if the NHL were to get back to broadcasting on ESPN.

The problem is that despite having a hockey cheerleader in Buccigross hosting this, they basically abandoned it. I doubt they would put money into this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The problem is that despite having a hockey cheerleader in Buccigross hosting this, they basically abandoned it. I doubt they would put money into this.

They used to have a "2nite" show for just about everything. NHL 2nite, NBA 2nite, even Boxing 2nite. I think the only one that survived is Baseball Tonight, which is a shame because those were really great shows. Just another bad trend from a sports network becoming less and less concerned with actual sports.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They used to have a "2nite" show for just about everything. NHL 2nite, NBA 2nite, even Boxing 2nite. I think the only one that survived is Baseball Tonight, which is a shame because those were really great shows. Just another bad trend from a sports network becoming less and less concerned with actual sports.

While becoming less and less relevant to sports fans.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ESPN is to sports what MTV is to music. Thanks to the NHL and NFL Networks, I never have to watch ESPN for highlights or news. Which is just fantastic by me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ESPN is to sports what MTV is to music. Thanks to the NHL and NFL Networks, I never have to watch ESPN for highlights or news. Which is just fantastic by me.

Odin be praised.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Listened to the Bettman show with Lou on the other day, said they weren't talking to ESPN or ESPN2 at all about contracts, and are very happy with Versus and whatnot. I'd like them to be on ESPN2, but I doubt it'll happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ESPN is to sports what MTV is to music. Thanks to the NHL and NFL Networks, I never have to watch ESPN for highlights or news. Which is just fantastic by me.

Throw in the new MLB Network and this is the post of the year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whether you're for it or against it, try traveling to a hotel & getting the Versus channel to watch a game. I don't travel much but the few I've been to do not have it.

Until ESPN gets back a piece of hockey, it will be out of the American mainstream.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whether you're for it or against it, try traveling to a hotel & getting the Versus channel to watch a game. I don't travel much but the few I've been to do not have it.

Until ESPN gets back a piece of hockey, it will be out of the American mainstream.

Again, ESPN HAD a piece of hockey and treated it like trash. The American mainstream is never going to follow hockey anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whether you're for it or against it, try traveling to a hotel & getting the Versus channel to watch a game. I don't travel much but the few I've been to do not have it.

Until ESPN gets back a piece of hockey, it will be out of the American mainstream.

A good point, but where there's a will there is a way.

Countless times over the years while away from home, including the Sportschannel years, I would just find a Sports Bar to go watch the game.

It was always funny being in someplace like FLA, CA, TX etc and asking the barkeep to turn on a hockey game (!) & better yet for a Devils game !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whether you're for it or against it, try traveling to a hotel & getting the Versus channel to watch a game. I don't travel much but the few I've been to do not have it.

Until ESPN gets back a piece of hockey, it will be out of the American mainstream.

Exactly

Its not only about how ESPN treats hockey in terms of game presentation but its more about ESPN following hockey on Sports Center. Notice since hockey disapeared from ESPN both in the early 1990's and post-lockout hockey highlights have been nearly nil except for a 2 minute blerb with Melrose at the far-end of SC. There's no reason for ESPN/Disney to promote the NHL because they get nothing out of it in terms of marketing and promotion for ESPN/Disney (which we all know is all they're about). Look at the change in ESPN's overkill on NBA coverage versus their actual ratings which are dismal. Heck they even mention the games on TNT during ESPN games just because of they hope a high tide raises all boats.

Like it or not ESPN is the national sports channel where people tune in for sports conversation and Sports Center is the "town square" for that conversation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Throw in the new MLB Network and this is the post of the year.

Baseball is a distant 3rd for me in terms of sports... I have spent about 10 minutes watching the MLB Network since it started. Over the summer I'll check it out more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My worry with ESPN is that they obviously think their MNF broadcast crew is working. That shows a serious lapse in judgement & I'd be concerned that the crew they'd assemble would make Thorne & Clement sound like hall of fame hockey broadcasters. I'm thinking that knucklehead Jennrette from Buffalo here.

With Vs. and NHL Network they get the support and attention that I'm not sure ESPN will give.

As far as the casual sports fan being attracted, in order to do that I think we need more convicted felons and a steroid controversy. All we've got is Sean Avery and that just doesn't cut it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whether you're for it or against it, try traveling to a hotel & getting the Versus channel to watch a game. I don't travel much but the few I've been to do not have it.

Until ESPN gets back a piece of hockey, it will be out of the American mainstream.

fvck ESPN. The last time they had hockey they did everything they could to keep it out of the American mainstream while airing bullriding and poker all the time. If the NHL is going to be treated like a second class citizen over there, I'd rather have them stay on Versus where it's the main draw for the network.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fvck ESPN. The last time they had hockey they did everything they could to keep it out of the American mainstream while airing bullriding and poker all the time. If the NHL is going to be treated like a second class citizen over there, I'd rather have them stay on Versus where it's the main draw for the network.

Amen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Exactly

Its not only about how ESPN treats hockey in terms of game presentation but its more about ESPN following hockey on Sports Center. Notice since hockey disapeared from ESPN both in the early 1990's and post-lockout hockey highlights have been nearly nil except for a 2 minute blerb with Melrose at the far-end of SC. There's no reason for ESPN/Disney to promote the NHL because they get nothing out of it in terms of marketing and promotion for ESPN/Disney (which we all know is all they're about). Look at the change in ESPN's overkill on NBA coverage versus their actual ratings which are dismal. Heck they even mention the games on TNT during ESPN games just because of they hope a high tide raises all boats.

Like it or not ESPN is the national sports channel where people tune in for sports conversation and Sports Center is the "town square" for that conversation.

Wow, your memory of ESPN/Sportscenter are 180 degrees from mine. There was virtually ZERO coverage of the NHL on SC.

I wish I had tapes to prove this, but I recall being really pissed about how little coverage there was, and this was during the Finals !

during Oct/Nov it is all college football, and nothing on the NHL

in Dec/Jan it is all NFL

Feb/Mar is all college b-ball

April thru June it is all MLB

Again I understand the viewers & money were in the Big 3 (base, bask, foot) so I know why they did not cover the little NHL.

But to recall that they did a "good job with the NHL" is a real stretch, IMO.

in contrast the most coverage espn gave the NHL was when Brasher chopped Mcsorely.

That even forced the Sportsreporters to talk about the NHL !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There is far too much emotionality in this thread for this argument to be rational.

ESPN is not my favorite channel, but it is the hub of sports. If the NHL can get a better contract out of them (when games are played, how they are presented, ancillary coverage), it will be better for the sport which has grown DESPITE Versus, the student film of sports channels.

The NHL returning to ESPN will be a benefit to the sport. Anyone who believes that it's better off on channel six-hundred-and-fvcking-four needs to pour themselves another drink.

They were promised this before and ESPN broke almost every promise. But, I will admit, ESPN did it for a reason. The way ESPN used to justify their coverage of the NHL was that it delivered one key demographic. Despite the continual low ratings (and they were always low, they just became lower as it went along) the sport used to attract a solid, coveted demo in decent numbers: white men 18-29. Around the year 2000, this demo started to watch less and less TV, inlcuding cable (if it wasn't movie channels, basiaclly, anything that had commercials) and, if they did watch it, they were early adapters to TiVo. ESPN lost any reason to carry the sport. It lost the only reason it had to sell the sport to advertisers.

You will recall the last campaign ESPN used to try to attract viewers. It certainly wasn't trying to attract 'casual' sports fans. No casual sports fan was going to see the 'Hockey Falls' ad execution, which portrayed hockey's rabid fans (and their own ESPN announcers) as hicks and idiots and basically said - "look everyone, here's our core audience and the people who announce our games, join us, why don't you - watch the NHL" and go anywhere near the sport. Yep, that was the way ESPN decided to go out and sell the NHL to the casual fan near the end of the contract. That, and not giving the game a regular night. And laughing at it - when they discussed it at all - on any other ESPN programming.

ESPN now has Monday Night Football, the NBA (and, as part of that contract, they have contractual obligations that they cannot break to the WNBA and believe me, they give a damn about not breaking the NBA contract - they don't give a sh*t about not breaking an NHL contract), MLB, men's college baskeball, women's college basketball (and thus, at some level, both tournaments, which is they have it), college football, plus a sh*t-load of other stuff. Where are they going to program the NHL? Oh, right, they'll do what they did before. Shove it in wherever they can fit it, which was part of the problem, and it will die, just like it did before.

And, if you really think ESPN is going to give up a college bowl game on News Years day just because this year the Winter Classic outdrew some of the bowl games, it isn't happening. If, somehow, this were to wind up on ESPN, I guarantee you, it suddenly wouldn't be what it is now, good alternative programming for people who are bored by the lackluster bowl games now on New Year's day, ESPN will make them move the game, and ruin it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My worry with ESPN is that they obviously think their MNF broadcast crew is working. That shows a serious lapse in judgement & I'd be concerned that the crew they'd assemble would make Thorne & Clement sound like hall of fame hockey broadcasters. I'm thinking that knucklehead Jennrette from Buffalo here.

With Vs. and NHL Network they get the support and attention that I'm not sure ESPN will give.

As far as the casual sports fan being attracted, in order to do that I think we need more convicted felons and a steroid controversy. All we've got is Sean Avery and that just doesn't cut it.

I disagree. Putting NHL On The Fly on NHL Network is a big mistake. That can be a powerful tool in bringing in casual fans and it is wasted on a pay channel. Not that ESPN would be better but Versus and NHL Network is not all peaches and lemonade. I travel fairly regularly and unless I am in a real dive I have gotten Versus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Throw in the new MLB Network and this is the post of the year.

Hell yeah MLBN rocks.. they have carried a ton of WBC games and have a bunch of cool shows and they actually kinda over-due the MLB Hot-stove show.. the classic games are awesome too. Its just gonna get better once this season starts and they carry MLB season games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I disagree. Putting NHL On The Fly on NHL Network is a big mistake. That can be a powerful tool in bringing in casual fans and it is wasted on a pay channel. Not that ESPN would be better but Versus and NHL Network is not all peaches and lemonade. I travel fairly regularly and unless I am in a real dive I have gotten Versus.

On Comcast at least NHL Network is on the same package as NFL Network and a bunch of other sports channels, and it costs peanuts. Most any casual sports fan is going to pop for this package; heck all we watch is NFL Network and NHL Network and it's more than worth it.

I don't know how it works on other systems.

Nightly two hour game recap marathons just is not going to work on any channel not dedicated to hockey; it's just not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I disagree. Putting NHL On The Fly on NHL Network is a big mistake. That can be a powerful tool in bringing in casual fans and it is wasted on a pay channel. Not that ESPN would be better but Versus and NHL Network is not all peaches and lemonade. I travel fairly regularly and unless I am in a real dive I have gotten Versus.

NHL on the Fly on the NHL Network negates ever having to sit through SC. ESPN would NEVER have this type of show on their network or espn2 for that matter because it will interfer with their Pro Bowling contract.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0