thefiestygoat

MacLean has been fired. Confirmed on NJ.com

296 posts in this topic

no i also think we can make the playoffs now because teams are not as good as usual and 88 might not be the floor for 8th spot. we have a decent shot at phillying in.

As of right now, it's going to take 96 points to get the 8th seed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is hilarious.

I'm officially embarrassed to be a Devils' fan. Absolutely embarrassed.

Lemaire? Hah. Whoever said it is right. Vanderbeek said to Lou "This is your fvcking mess. I wanted XYZ, you wanted MacLean. You clean it up."

Lou needs step down or Vanderbeek needs to step him down. I never thought I'd be saying this, but it's time. This organization has gone so far off the rails since the lockout that I no longer even know what I'm watching and what I'm rooting for.

Lou should have fired himself during that pathetic press conference.

WHERE ARE THE TRADES AND CUTS OF THESE LOSERS WEARING RED? Langenbrunner should have been dealt in the off-season for his bitchfest last year. I've never seen a bigger pansy in a hockey uniform, outside Sean Avery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like I suddenly forgot how soft this team was and how they gave up on JL. What makes management think he's going motivate them this time around?

Here comes the line shuffling, even if they're working. There goes Tedenby's progress too....Bergfors part deux. Fvck Lemaire

Are you serious? Bergfors was just not very good at anything other than scoring. He didn't backcheck or play defense at all and he refused to get into the dirty areas and risk being hit or hit someone himself.

Tedenby seems to be a far more well rounded player and is much more adept on defense than Bergfors was. As mentioned by many other, Bergfors is in the doghouse in Atlanta as well for problems he has with the coach. Sounds like this is an issue with Bergfors that he had here and that's why he was gotten rid of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bergfors was just not very good at anything other than scoring. He didn't backcheck or play defense at all and he refused to get into the dirty areas and risk being hit or hit someone himself.

Imagine if he was REALLY good at scoring. He could make $100 million!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What? The Flyers from a couple of years ago? How do you figure that?

Clearly Jay Pandolfo's shooting percentage made the Devils a far superior team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tri, i don't understand where finishing last overall impacts next season?

All sorts of ways.

1: The longer the team goes playing terribly, the more likely the players on the team are terrible players.

2: Everyone's trade value goes right into the toilet, gutter, or wherever one's least valued items are thrown.

3: Psychologically, I think it would be healthier for this team to start winning. This team isn't getting broken up, and for the most part, it's a bunch of NHL players on this team - they're not going away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tri, i don't understand where finishing last overall impacts next season?

I think it impacts in some ways. Free Agents may not want to come here. Guys with NTCs on other teams that we may vie for may not accept a trade to us because of being perceptibly inept. The fact that we have the most unstable coaching position in all of sports also hurts.

Finishing last doesn't "look good" especially when you look at who is on the roster. Its not a young team and the young guys we do have don't seem to be progressing the way they have on other squads.

I'm looking forward to Jamie leaving and seeing what he has to say after he's been gone. The split will be amicable, but I think the aftermath won't be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely agreed with the last two posts, that's why I :rolleyes: at the tanking talk. Especially considering how indignant we get as a fanbase when the Penguins actually did tank to get Mario.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All sorts of ways.

1: The longer the team goes playing terribly, the more likely the players on the team are terrible players.

2: Everyone's trade value goes right into the toilet, gutter, or wherever one's least valued items are thrown.

3: Psychologically, I think it would be healthier for this team to start winning. This team isn't getting broken up, and for the most part, it's a bunch of NHL players on this team - they're not going away.

The more likely the players become terrible players or are continue to be terrible players?

Our players have a value already, and it's not likely to change drastically unless we start winning every game, which it won't. If Jacques can make them start playing better, fine, but there's no way to measure the value of our players. GMs know what these guys bring.

My point is everything resets back to zero when the season ends and our draft pick being the highest it can be is BENEFICIAL to this organization whether we keep that pick or trade it. The story changes from losing to hope for next year once the season ends and the roster/coach starts to take shape.

In the long run it's probably better for us finish as low as possible. However you can't aim for that, it either happens or it doesn't. We've clearly already built a team that sucks. It wouldn't surprise me if we started to get rid of the deadwood, replacing them with AHLers - that we'd start being more compeitive.

Of course it would be psychologically better for the team to start winning. "Team being broken up" is general. Clearly there'll be player moves...most likely.

You can't PURPOSEFULLY tank - that's crazy and you really can't do that anymore than what we've already been doing. We put together a sh!tty team that loses, what more else do we need to do to make that happen. You're not suggesting we trade players to win NOW - that would be crazy. So HOW can we insure this team start winning to better the psyche? In the long run it doesn't matter.

All I'm saying is - I really don't care if this team starts winning or not. I root for them to win every game. I'm not one of those who cheer when they are getting scored upon MANTA :koolaid: Tanking is clearly not what I am saying.

If the goal is to get better. For me, that starts with getting better players. Finishing last usually increases those chances either by that #1 pick or via trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it impacts in some ways. Free Agents may not want to come here. Guys with NTCs on other teams that we may vie for may not accept a trade to us because of being perceptibly inept. The fact that we have the most unstable coaching position in all of sports also hurts.

Finishing last doesn't "look good" especially when you look at who is on the roster. Its not a young team and the young guys we do have don't seem to be progressing the way they have on other squads.

I'm looking forward to Jamie leaving and seeing what he has to say after he's been gone. The split will be amicable, but I think the aftermath won't be.

Free agents aren't banging down the door unless their name is Tallinder and we give them stupid contracts.

You know, an FA, may look at our team and go "Yea they finished last, but they have some great players and they just got a number 1/2 overall pick - they might turn it around quickly like Philly." Having the number one pick is sexier than having the 10th pick.

Look good? Who cares. These guys don't look at the standings, they look at the team. If Zach looked at our players and thought we'd have a chance to turn around quickly - he might stay. Those chances increase at getting the number one overall pick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All sorts of ways.

1: The longer the team goes playing terribly, the more likely the players on the team are terrible players.

2: Everyone's trade value goes right into the toilet, gutter, or wherever one's least valued items are thrown.

3: Psychologically, I think it would be healthier for this team to start winning. This team isn't getting broken up, and for the most part, it's a bunch of NHL players on this team - they're not going away.

I think there is some truth to this, but a lot of it isn't. A losing culture is dangerous. Losing can take its toll on a lot of good players. You see it in the NBA with teams like the Clippers, or in the NFL in the past with the Lions and Raiders. But I don't think finishing bottom 3 is the end of the world for this team.

Win or lose, the value for half this team has dropped dramatically. Clarkson has gone from a guy that every team loved to a player that most teams wouldn't dare touch. Rolston...well the only way he is being traded is if some team needs him for salary cap purposes or what not. He is finished as an NHL player pretty much. Not trading Tallinder, Zubrus etc anyway.

I'm not worried about anyting psychologically, really just point #1. The main thing is that a ton of the players have come from a winning culture. This is an absolute awful season for guys like Marty, White and Patty who have experienced so much winning in the past. To a lesser extent guys like Zajac, Volchenkov, Greene, Zubrus have been on winning regular season teams throughout their career. No way they accept this moving forward. So either these guys are washed up and suck or things change. But at the same time we have seen for the last 82 games that there are a lot of problems. Finishing 5-6 games over .500 isn't going to make me think differently about half this team.

Luckily Parise has been out all year during this disaster. I think he's going to come back at an elite level, especially after missing a year. The bonus is he only experienced the losses from afar. He isn't going to be mentally hurt by this awful year. I think just Parise being back gives Travis a serious boost. Kovalchuk has come from losing cultures his entire career. Not sure if that works well for us or not. They still have a whole bunch of young guys coming in.

We all have different opinions, but I still think getting a top 2 pick outweights finishing stronger down the stretch and getting a 6-7th pick like Florida/Phoenix gets every year. Maybe it will be a serious wake up call to Lou. Because right now he thinks that under a veteran coach they can get a lot better, and he obviously thinks this team is a lot better than their record shows, which I am not sure is the case. Individual players, sure...but as a team, I don't know.

Reality is that the Devils have dug themselves so deep that they have room to play a lot better, and still finish bottom 2-3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which is by fine by me DR. Win a little bit finish in the bottom 4 or 5. DO NOT, finish 10th that's fvcking terrible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i don't have time to answer this in full, but patches o'houlihan made the best post in this thread, and i suggest you guys go back there and read it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i don't have time to answer this in full, but patches o'houlihan made the best post in this thread, and i suggest you guys go back there and read it.

I can't tell you how the top 10 picks rate. I don't know if it is top heavy in the first 5 and then it goes downhill, or if the top 3 are weak compared to past years, but 5-10 is very strong. I'm not worried, however, about the large cap hit or an extra year early entering the UFA market to be honest. If you are getting a very good player, it's worth it in the long run. Say you draft a player like Stamkos where you are paying a ton of money, and he sucks in the first year or has a hard time adapting. But you clearly saw how dangerous he became in year 2 and now year 3. He's now a hell of a bargain, and we'll probably be locked up well before he becomes a UFA like all of these early draft picks have in the past. Not saying a top guy will be anywhere near Stamkos good. Eric Staal is another example of a guy who struggled in year 1 and exploded in year two. I don't think that first year hurt anyone.

If we get a defenseman, I definitely think you don't go go that route though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^Staal having a 100-point season in year two was largely helped by the fact that it was his third year as a pro - he spent his second professional year in the AHL during the lockout.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't tell you how the top 10 picks rate. I don't know if it is top heavy in the first 5 and then it goes downhill, or if the top 3 are weak compared to past years, but 5-10 is very strong. I'm not worried, however, about the large cap hit or an extra year early entering the UFA market to be honest. If you are getting a very good player, it's worth it in the long run. Say you draft a player like Stamkos where you are paying a ton of money, and he sucks in the first year or has a hard time adapting. But you clearly saw how dangerous he became in year 2 and now year 3. He's now a hell of a bargain, and we'll probably be locked up well before he becomes a UFA like all of these early draft picks have in the past. Not saying a top guy will be anywhere near Stamkos good. Eric Staal is another example of a guy who struggled in year 1 and exploded in year two. I don't think that first year hurt anyone.

If we get a defenseman, I definitely think you don't go go that route though.

again, same time constraints, but there is not a stamkos-level player in this draft. oh boo hoo he scores 25 goals in his first season and then becomes a top 10 player in the NHL. eric staal took advantage of the ridiculousness of the 05-06 season which isn't coming back. there isn't this sort of player in this draft. and again, THE BONUS CUSHION IS OFF. you don't seem to comprehend how serious a problem this is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sorry but my mentality is you play to win or improve the team by allowing rookies to gain experience and play to win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The more likely the players become terrible players or are continue to be terrible players?

both, obviously. i don't think anyone is as bad a player as they've shown this season.

Our players have a value already, and it's not likely to change drastically unless we start winning every game, which it won't. If Jacques can make them start playing better, fine, but there's no way to measure the value of our players. GMs know what these guys bring.

some of them just need a market of 1 team, but sucking won't help us find them that new home.

My point is everything resets back to zero when the season ends and our draft pick being the highest it can be is BENEFICIAL to this organization whether we keep that pick or trade it. The story changes from losing to hope for next year once the season ends and the roster/coach starts to take shape.

like i said, o'houlihan already pointed out that finishing 1st overall may not be good. one reason is that teams are pressured to put in the 1st overall pick right away - the last 1st overall pick who didn't play in the nhl the season after being drafted (lockout excepted) is chris phillips. a first overall pick taking up 4 million on the cap is a disaster.

i also don't think that everything goes back to zero after the season ends. most of the players on the team right now are going to be on this team next season.

In the long run it's probably better for us finish as low as possible. However you can't aim for that, it either happens or it doesn't. We've clearly already built a team that sucks. It wouldn't surprise me if we started to get rid of the deadwood, replacing them with AHLers - that we'd start being more compeitive.

Of course it would be psychologically better for the team to start winning. "Team being broken up" is general. Clearly there'll be player moves...most likely.

You can't PURPOSEFULLY tank - that's crazy and you really can't do that anymore than what we've already been doing. We put together a sh!tty team that loses, what more else do we need to do to make that happen. You're not suggesting we trade players to win NOW - that would be crazy. So HOW can we insure this team start winning to better the psyche? In the long run it doesn't matter.

All I'm saying is - I really don't care if this team starts winning or not. I root for them to win every game. I'm not one of those who cheer when they are getting scored upon MANTA :koolaid: Tanking is clearly not what I am saying.

If the goal is to get better. For me, that starts with getting better players. Finishing last usually increases those chances either by that #1 pick or via trade.

already addressed most of these points above. in the long run it does matter. why do you think detroit manages to convince just about everyone to take a pay cut to go there or stay there? because it's a well run organization that wins a lot and that people want to play for. the devils used to be this kind of a place, and it's very hard to compete in this league without talking people into taking pay cuts. there's not many secrets in NHL free agency. there's not many opportunities to trade anymore - the last substantial non-'deadline' move the devils made was the petr sykora trade. entry level contracts are huge, but 2nd and 3rd contracts are enormous as well. a losing culture is not going to help this. and the quicker the losing culture gets turned around, the better it is for everyone. like i already posted, it's going to be extremely difficult to finish 10th. the team needs to forget about the maclean era and believe that they are capable of winning - it's going to be these guys here next year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now