Kovy138 Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 you fvcking kidding me with that icing call? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScoreMoreThan3 Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 fvck. Just keep it close boys. The time out paid off for the Pens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScoreMoreThan3 Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 Well so much for that. Oh well at least were fvcking over the Rags. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil Dan 56 Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 Is there a new rule where the devils feel the need to pass 5 times before shooting? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devilsfan26 Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 And the ambiguity of "distinct kicking motion" strikes again, another goal that could have gone either way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin226 Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 You had to know we'd get screwed there.. Sometimes it's "it has to be a clear kick" and other times (like when we score) its "well the puck went off the skate" It's and absolute joke rule.. They can pretty much call whatever they want and have shown that they will Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamtheprodigy Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 And the ambiguity of "distinct kicking motion" strikes again, another goal that could have gone either way. Could have gone either way if it wasn't a Pens player scoring the goal assisted by Crosby. Then there's only one way it can go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven M. Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 Apparently we can punt the puck in now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mayday Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 (edited) can believe that a$$hole cooke is still allowed to play in the league. please tell me, how was that a penalty? Edited March 17, 2012 by Mayday Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJDevs4978 Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 And the ambiguity of "distinct kicking motion" strikes again, another goal that could have gone either way. That was not a kicking motion at all, sorry. This team is just self destructing right now. If I see one more pass with an open shot I'm slamming my phone to the ground. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironsights Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 hate that skate deflection rule. it's bullsh!t Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legion15 Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 (edited) yeah no distinct kicking motion but intentional (not inadvertent) redirection with the foot is allowed. and with their current win streak, Cindy being back and the way this game is going....the Penguins take their spot as the new NHL darlings this game is complete crap and it's not just our playing. The penguins can't be this good. Malkin? Crysby? Dupuis? Kunitz!?? nah, I couldn't care less about their win streak, their stars, their system, their city, their anything... we have the better talent but we're not showing it lately and that's what pisses me off. We're getting tooled by teams we should beat handily Edited March 17, 2012 by Legion15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kovy138 Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 fvck.. i wish i bought tickets to this one. anyway LGD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! well, nevermind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devilsfan26 Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 That was not a kicking motion at all, sorry. This team is just self destructing right now. If I see one more pass with an open shot I'm slamming my phone to the ground. We have seen that call go both ways countless times. Sometimes they say it is a kicking motion and sometimes they say it isn't. They need to just allow or disallow all goals off an attacking player's skate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJDevs4978 Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 Is there a new rule where the devils feel the need to pass 5 times before shooting? It's the Gene Hackman rule from Hoosiers lol...four passes before shooting Hope they got all the Penguin autographs they wanted Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin226 Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 Could have gone either way if it wasn't a Pens player scoring the goal assisted by Crosby. Then there's only one way it can go. You hate to be the conspiracy guy, but a pattern exists that can't be denied.. It wasn't there back around 1999-2001 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScoreMoreThan3 Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 The Pens are good and the Devils can't score goals right now. End of story. Wow. fvcking pathetic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DevsMan84 Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 The devils right now have an authentic 80s devils score this game and soon an authentic 80s devils record for these retro nights Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJDevs4978 Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 (edited) Of course intentional redirection is allowed. It shouldn't be on the books but it is. You guys are just grasping at straws, we've had more PP's so far in a game we've been utterly dominated, this isn't a conspiracy game. Edited March 17, 2012 by NJDevs4978 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil Dan 56 Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 Really can't stand these Pittsburgh fans. I don't think any of them have heard of a player from before 2005. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mayday Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 yeah marty!!! some show up and hit crosby. not to hurt him but send a fvcking message. Really can't stand these Pittsburgh fans. I don't think any of them have heard of a player from before 2005. at the game? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamtheprodigy Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 That was not a kicking motion at all, sorry. Yeah, and neither was Parise's tying goal in the last second against the Islanders this year, sorry. Point is, the rule sucks. They just call it however they want. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Z-Man Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 (edited) The penguins can't be this good. Malkin? Crysby? Dupuis? Kunitz!?? nah, I couldn't care less about their win streak, their stars, their system, their city, their anything... we have the better talent but we're not showing it lately and that's what pisses me off. We're getting tooled by teams we should beat handily And how many green beers have we had so far? Thanks for the laugh. Edited March 17, 2012 by Z-Man Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJDevs4978 Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 Yeah, and neither was Parise's tying goal in the last second against the Islanders this year, sorry. Point is, the rule sucks. They just call it however they want. No, but it stupidly got called as one. Two wrong calls don't equal a right one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven M. Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 Does anyone else wonder why everytime an opposing team calls a timeout while were playing well, we collapse after the timeout? Also, does anyone else think Chico is trying to fvck Crosby? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.