Jump to content

Photo

Devils $80 Million Debt


  • Please log in to reply
62 replies to this topic

#1 dmon2010

dmon2010

    Prospect

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 109 posts

Posted 13 January 2012 - 12:03 PM

Just saw this regarding the Devils' debt:

http://www.myfoxny.c...bt-ncx-20120113

Not sure how accurate it is (or isn't for that matter), but figured I'd post it...
  • 0

#2 ohms law

ohms law

    Senior Devil

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 646 posts

Posted 13 January 2012 - 12:18 PM

You know... keep in mind that Vanderbeek and pretty much every other sports owner in North America are doing funny things with their books these days. Forbes and the Star-Ledger just a coupe of weeks ago were talking about the Prudential Center making something like $180 million per year in profits or some such thing. So, the arena (who's profits are tax free I think) is making tons of profit, while the team (which has to pay somewhat exorbitant state and federal taxes) is loosing some money... it's always amazing how that works out.

I'm not saying we should ignore this stuff or bury our heads in the sand, but I think that it should always be taken with a grain of salt. What's-his-name from Brick is definitely trying to get out of the partnership, but so what? The way I see it he accomplished his goals in getting the team to move to Newark. He has other priorities (including development around the Prudential Center), and apparently needs liquidity, so it's actually better for the team in the long run if he does divest.

Of course, I say all this now and then watch, in 6 months it'll turn out that the Prudential center is actually loosing money too, and the team really is folding. :rolleyes:
  • 0

#3 ohms law

ohms law

    Senior Devil

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 646 posts

Posted 13 January 2012 - 12:23 PM

ps.: Keep in mind that all of this is coming from Josh Kosman from the NY Post, as well. He broke the original story, and this is a follow up. Not exactly the most trustworthy source, especially about financial news. I'm sure that something is going on, but it's likely not exactly what Koseman is reporting.
  • 0

#4 dmon2010

dmon2010

    Prospect

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 109 posts

Posted 13 January 2012 - 12:23 PM

I think I remember reading that the Wendy's guy was interested in the Devils? If I'm not mistaken it was somewhere in these forums, but I'm not sure whatever came of it...

Edited by dmon2010, 13 January 2012 - 12:23 PM.

  • 0

#5 DevsMan84

DevsMan84

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,108 posts

Posted 13 January 2012 - 12:23 PM

Another wonderful article on the state of the Devils financial situation. Yet, we are all supposed to see this as nothing and all is well. Yeah right :rolleyes:

Edited by DevsMan84, 13 January 2012 - 12:43 PM.

  • 0

#6 DevsMan84

DevsMan84

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,108 posts

Posted 13 January 2012 - 12:26 PM

I think I remember reading that the Wendy's guy was interested in the Devils? If I'm not mistaken it was somewhere in these forums, but I'm not sure whatever came of it...



It was just speculation
  • 0

#7 NJDevs4978

NJDevs4978

    A Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,498 posts

Posted 13 January 2012 - 12:31 PM

Another wonderful article on the state of the Devils financial situation. Yet, we are all supposed to see this as nothing and all is call. Yeah right :rolleyes:


You know what people will say...it's the Post (who was right about Sutter leaving and Kovy's contract), or it's someone with an agenda as if that automatically makes something untrue. The Devils said the Post was wrong, wonderful...the Mets lied about their finances for two years, look how well that's going.
  • 0
"The Devils have high standards, that's the difference. We have a standard to live up to every year, and a couple of teams in our area don't have the standards we do." - Pat Burns

The New Jersey Devils win Stanley Cups everywhere:
-NHL record for most road wins in the playoffs - 10-1 in '95 and 10-2 in '00
-NHL record for most home wins in the playoffs - 12-1 in '03

#8 ohms law

ohms law

    Senior Devil

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 646 posts

Posted 13 January 2012 - 12:34 PM

I think I remember reading that the Wendy's guy was interested in the Devils? If I'm not mistaken it was somewhere in these forums, but I'm not sure whatever came of it...



It was just speculation


And, he publicly denied it. I forget his name or I'd look it up (and the Post started the rumor that he was interested as well, by the way). But that guy has been involved with hockey for years, from the outside. But, he's never gotten directly involved. I think that the last time was about Ottawa, if I remember correctly.
  • 0

#9 DevsMan84

DevsMan84

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,108 posts

Posted 13 January 2012 - 12:42 PM

You know what people will say...it's the Post (who was right about Sutter leaving and Kovy's contract), or it's someone with an agenda as if that automatically makes something untrue. The Devils said the Post was wrong, wonderful...the Mets lied about their finances for two years, look how well that's going.



Exactly and if the Post was posting stories that are completely untrue, then JVB and company would have unleased their lawyers on the Post. Since this has not happened, even if the Post writer has some of agenda against the Devils, there still remains some truth to his article.

Like the old saying "when there is smoke, there is fire"
  • 0

#10 EdgeControl

EdgeControl

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,367 posts

Posted 13 January 2012 - 12:54 PM

Who owns the Rock? the city or Vandy? is this 80 mil part of the original 100 mil promised?

hard to tell whats really going on

can we get fannie or freddie to help us out LOL
  • 0

#11 ohms law

ohms law

    Senior Devil

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 646 posts

Posted 13 January 2012 - 01:09 PM

Exactly and if the Post was posting stories that are completely untrue, then JVB and company would have unleased their lawyers on the Post.


...not necessarily.
I mean, yea, if it were utterly fabricated he might. Maybe.
But consider the fact that sports teams really value their privacy (for whatever reason), historically. I wouldn't be surprised if they let something slide with nothing more than public denials. Especially something from the NY Post (proud publishers of Page Six that they are, you know?).

Like I said, I'm sure that something is going on, but it's likely not exactly what Koseman is reporting.
  • 0

#12 Chuck the Duck

Chuck the Duck

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,599 posts

Posted 13 January 2012 - 01:18 PM

Exactly and if the Post was posting stories that are completely untrue, then JVB and company would have unleased their lawyers on the Post. Since this has not happened, even if the Post writer has some of agenda against the Devils, there still remains some truth to his article.

Like the old saying "when there is smoke, there is fire"


It is unlikely that any sports team, or its owner, would sue a newspaper for defamation and/or libel. In a case such as this, the team/owner would have to publically disclose its finanical records in order to prevail on its cause of action vs. the paper. There is NO way any team/owner would ever do that. Therefore, even if this story is total BS (which it likely isn't), they still wouldn't sue, unless the team was owned by Donald Trump who makes money solely because people think he has money.
  • 0
Posted Image

#13 Triumph

Triumph

    A Legend

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 27,788 posts

Posted 13 January 2012 - 01:20 PM

I don't believe that the league would allow the Devils to securitize their payments from MSG. For one, that's a huge chunk of revenue for the Devils down the road that they wouldn't have - if Vanderbeek has to sell the team anyway, that's a giant negative on the balance sheet that there would be no TV revenue for many years to come. Two, I imagine it would play havoc with what's considered Hockey Related Revenue in the CBA.
  • 0

http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
 


#14 Chuck the Duck

Chuck the Duck

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,599 posts

Posted 13 January 2012 - 01:28 PM

I believe they should be trying to bring in a minority investor that would take a minority stake in the team, but a majority stake in Devils holding co. that operates and takes the reveneues from the Arena. I know JVB would hate to relinquish control of either entity, but his options are becoming more and more limited as the months pass.
  • 0
Posted Image

#15 ohms law

ohms law

    Senior Devil

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 646 posts

Posted 13 January 2012 - 01:32 PM

I don't believe that the league would allow the Devils to securitize their payments from MSG. For one, that's a huge chunk of revenue for the Devils down the road that they wouldn't have - if Vanderbeek has to sell the team anyway, that's a giant negative on the balance sheet that there would be no TV revenue for many years to come. Two, I imagine it would play havoc with what's considered Hockey Related Revenue in the CBA.


The MSG thing strikes me as pure speculation, regardless. It's like a trade rumor, or something...
Honestly, I hope that the Devils end up on YES in a couple of years anyway. But, that's a whole different topic.
  • 0

#16 Devils731

Devils731

    A Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,505 posts

Posted 13 January 2012 - 01:34 PM

I don't believe that the league would allow the Devils to securitize their payments from MSG. For one, that's a huge chunk of revenue for the Devils down the road that they wouldn't have - if Vanderbeek has to sell the team anyway, that's a giant negative on the balance sheet that there would be no TV revenue for many years to come. Two, I imagine it would play havoc with what's considered Hockey Related Revenue in the CBA.


I don't think it would make hockey related revenue any more difficult than it already is. The TV deal would still be credited as a yearly revenue at the same amount as always, regardless if the team had securitized it or not.
  • 0
Your unconditional rejection of violence makes you smugly think of yourselves as noble, as enlightened, but in reality it is nothing less than abject moral capitulation to evil. Unconditional rejection of self-defense, because you think its a supposed surrender to violence, leaves you no resort but begging for mercy or offering appeasement.

-Terry Goodkind


Sex Panther cologne -- 50 percent of the time, it works every time.

-Anchorman

The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The second best time is now.

-Anonymous

Keeper of Section 212-213's wayward step

#17 sundstrom

sundstrom

    Hall of Famer

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,302 posts

Posted 13 January 2012 - 02:01 PM

The MSG thing strikes me as pure speculation, regardless. It's like a trade rumor, or something...
Honestly, I hope that the Devils end up on YES in a couple of years anyway. But, that's a whole different topic.


The Devils aren't leaving Fox Sports - the TV deal is ridiculously lucrative - that's why JVB is trying to get a loan against the guaranteed revenue. it's worth hundreds of millions (i want to say $15MM/year for 20 years but I can't remember exactly).

Edited by sundstrom, 13 January 2012 - 02:02 PM.

  • 0

"This team was never the same once we lost Patrik Sundstrom"- Lou Lamoriello


20082719943.png
_________________________________________________________________
“They’re the ones that makes it happen,” Lemaire said. “It’s not us. It’s not me. It’s not the other guy. It’s not the guy before. It’s not the guy after. It’s them. And they have to take care of business.”
-
"I guess I just miss my friend" (#28)


#18 newarkdev01

newarkdev01

    Senior Devil

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 897 posts

Posted 13 January 2012 - 02:12 PM

I think the story has a lot of truth to it and seems to line up with things that Forbes has been saying for a while as well. Pure and simple, it seems the devils are over leveraged and struggling to find a minority partner or way to pay down the debt to bring them back to a operable cash flow level. I like JVB as an owner but I think he is probably in over his head. Regardless this doesn't mean the team moves it just means that we might loose out on free agents like Parise while it all has to get worked out.
  • 0

#19 EdgeControl

EdgeControl

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,367 posts

Posted 13 January 2012 - 02:22 PM

The Devils aren't leaving Fox Sports - the TV deal is ridiculously lucrative - that's why JVB is trying to get a loan against the guaranteed revenue. it's worth hundreds of millions (i want to say $15MM/year for 20 years but I can't remember exactly).

It doesnt sound good for JVB, if they are having trouble securing 80 mil with 100+ mil in equity. the money must be leaking out of this team now,

people can say that the rock is financially healthy and it probally is, but how much non-hockey revenue makes it to the Devils? whats AEGs cut? whats the city's cut? sounds like the Devils and JVB have to sink or swim in a smaller revenue pie than first thought
  • 0

#20 newarkdev01

newarkdev01

    Senior Devil

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 897 posts

Posted 13 January 2012 - 02:48 PM

I think my greatest fear of the situation is that it's a bankruptcy and it takes forever to get a new owner. I can deal with a season in financial turmoil but I would hate to see the team gutted by the league or out of necessity as I have clearly been spoiled.
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users