justdo3043 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 how about yakopov? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ziti17 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 We all saw a glimpse of what Larsson could do in the playoffs in game 2 against the flyers. I want him to do well, but he can't do anything unless he plays. Deboer has to get him in the lineup I think they have to move a d-man playing now to create a spot for Larsson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SterioDesign Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 (edited) McKenzies says he thinks the PK situation will endup in a trade Montreal would probably look for another dman Edited January 24, 2013 by SterioDesign Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangersSuck23 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 (edited) I think they have to move a d-man playing now to create a spot for Larsson Yeah, I know, but the way Lou is, this could take a while Edited January 24, 2013 by RangersSuck23 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ziti17 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 Yeah, I know, but the way Lou is, this could take a while I'm hoping they do it sooner then later. Doing it mid-end of season could really hurt the teams chemistry. I wanna get Larsson in there ASAP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangersSuck23 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 I'm hoping they do it sooner then later. Doing it mid-end of season could really hurt the teams chemistry. I wanna get Larsson in there ASAP. Agreed agreed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
этотсайтебут Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 (edited) I'm hoping they do it sooner then later. Doing it mid-end of season could really hurt the teams chemistry. I wanna get Larsson in there ASAP. I agree. There is a price for everything I suppose, but I'd rather see this kid develop in NJ. The sky is the limit with him. NJ has always been solid on scouting which leads me to think there is no way they move a 4th overall pick two years after selection. If they do move him, the return had better bring out the "O" face. Edited January 24, 2013 by этотсайтебут Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SterioDesign Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 I'm hoping they do it sooner then later. Doing it mid-end of season could really hurt the teams chemistry. I wanna get Larsson in there ASAP. plus after the other year where they went in the season knowing someone would have to go with a black cloud on them for the whole time and Lou said he learned from it... same thing now... seems pretty obvious that they will have to trade a dman so... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ziti17 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 plus after the other year where they went in the season knowing someone would have to go with a black cloud on them for the whole time and Lou said he learned from it... same thing now... seems pretty obvious that they will have to trade a dman so... The question is who?? My guess would be Greene? Not sure though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beetlebum Posted January 24, 2013 Author Share Posted January 24, 2013 (edited) I'm sorry, but ,if we were really high on Larsson he would be playing right now whether or not we had to showcase Tally or Volch. Edited January 24, 2013 by Beetlebum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triumph Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 I'm sorry, but ,if we were really high on Larsson he would be playing right now whether or not we had to showcase Tally or Volch. He is 20. The list of 20 year old superstar defensemen is incredibly short. He's an average D right now and so are the guys you talked about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devilsfan118 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 I can't believe people are sounding like they've already given up on Larsson. He's freakin 19 years old. You wonder why he might look physically weaker than other guys out there? It's because he's still a damn kid, he's got so much freakin room to develop and grow. I'm all for talking the hypotheticals, but come on. Larsson is going to be a fantastic top-4 or top-2 defenseman in this league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ziti17 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 I can't believe people are sounding like they've already given up on Larsson. He's freakin 19 years old. You wonder why he might look physically weaker than other guys out there? It's because he's still a damn kid, he's got so much freakin room to develop and grow. I'm all for talking the hypotheticals, but come on. Larsson is going to be a fantastic top-4 or top-2 defenseman in this league. He hasn't done anything to give me any idea of giving up on him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadDog2020 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 "Who's better, Larsson or Hamilton?"Listening to Pierre tonight you'd think Hamilton is the greatest defensive prospect in NHL history Every rookie or young player is a future Hall of Famer if you listen to Pierre. He's a moron. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxpower Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 I can't believe people are sounding like they've already given up on Larsson. He's freakin 19 years old. You wonder why he might look physically weaker than other guys out there? It's because he's still a damn kid, he's got so much freakin room to develop and grow. I'm all for talking the hypotheticals, but come on. Larsson is going to be a fantastic top-4 or top-2 defenseman in this league. The problem with this is, by the time he develops, his RFA years are running out. And now you can't even lock these guys down anymore. So if I could trade him for a top defenseman who has mostly developed, and sign that guy to a long term deal + get a good draft pick out of it..... why wouldn't I do that? I can have PK Subban (in theory) for 8 years. Right now, I have Larsson for 5 years after this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roomtemp Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 Well if we got a 1st too and the Habs aren't very good so it might become 1st overall Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SterioDesign Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 Subban is not even listening to Meehan, he suggested him to take a 2 years deal offered by MTL and subban refused... I mean... Who do he think he is ? When he left last year too apparently he told his teamates that hed be back with doughty's contract Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 Every rookie or young player is a future Hall of Famer if you listen to Pierre. He's a moron. Except Cary Price. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepperkorn Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 WTF -- FOUR pages? Am I the only one here who sometimes just feel some threads dont need to be dignified with a response? And seriously -- responding to "If we're so high on larsson why aren't we playing him?" SERiOUSLY???? That merrits response on any level beyond a chuckle - at BEST a derisive chuckle? oh crap -- it's freaking 11 --- why am I not sleeping. $&*()@$^&*()#&@*_&$*()@.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zubie#8 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 Haha you guys cray! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarpathianForest Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 WTF -- FOUR pages? Am I the only one here who sometimes just feel some threads dont need to be dignified with a response? And seriously -- responding to "If we're so high on larsson why aren't we playing him?" SERiOUSLY???? That merrits response on any level beyond a chuckle - at BEST a derisive chuckle? oh crap -- it's freaking 11 --- why am I not sleeping. $&*()@$^&*()#&@*_&$*()@.... Speak of the Devil and she appears! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DH26 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 Subban is not even listening to Meehan, he suggested him to take a 2 years deal offered by MTL and subban refused... I mean... Who do he think he is ? Someone who wants a long term deal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triumph Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 Subban is not even listening to Meehan, he suggested him to take a 2 years deal offered by MTL and subban refused... I mean... Who do he think he is ? When he left last year too apparently he told his teamates that hed be back with doughty's contract If Meehan is leaking this publicly, it's a way of requesting a trade without actually coming out and requesting one, or perhaps inviting offer sheets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triumph Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 The problem with this is, by the time he develops, his RFA years are running out. And now you can't even lock these guys down anymore. So if I could trade him for a top defenseman who has mostly developed, and sign that guy to a long term deal + get a good draft pick out of it..... why wouldn't I do that? I can have PK Subban (in theory) for 8 years. Right now, I have Larsson for 5 years after this one. Well that's a bit of a false equivalency - if you get Subban for 8 years, you're going to have to do it very expensively to buy out those UFA years now. There's no reason why you can't have Larsson for 10 more years under that logic. And Lou's last long-term contracts to guys off ELCs either included a UFA year (zajac) or stopped before the guy was UFA (parise). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devlman Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 (edited) Please turn in your membership card now... Larsson is 20 and going to be a top 2 dman. </discussion> Edited January 24, 2013 by devlman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.