Edited by Blackjack, 20 March 2004 - 12:43 AM.
Did anyone see Elias' disallowed goal?
#1
Posted 20 March 2004 - 12:42 AM
#2
Posted 20 March 2004 - 12:45 AM
I was at the game also... I felt the same way as u.. but in the thread for tonights game there are a few comments about it so u may wanna check it out.. it seems from what i have read in that thread, that it was a bad call. I wanted to see it myself but metro doesnt replay the games I dont think..Fox Sports always does.I was at the game, and of course they don't show replays. But from where I was sitting (behind Garon) it looked like Elias' stick started high, but he moved it down to deflect the puck, and actually deflected it up into the net (impossible to do from above the crossbar) to tell you the truth, it didn't even look close. I was so disgusted when they took that goal away, and I had a feeling they would from the moment they reviewed it.
"Do people still do birthday parties at McDonalds? Like does Ronald McDonald still show up? Whatever happened to Grimace? Do they still run the Hamburgular? They were a hit back in the day. The Hamburgular, Grimace, who else?"
Rob Brink(My favorite writer): "Mayor McCheese."
Tim O'Connor : Mayor McCheese, oh my God! Holy sh!t how did you remember that?
Rob Brink : "He was wearing a tuxedo and his head was a fvckin’ cheeseburger dude!
#3
Guest_Devsrule_*
Posted 20 March 2004 - 12:47 AM
#4
Posted 20 March 2004 - 12:47 AM
#5
Posted 20 March 2004 - 12:47 AM
TSN showed slo-mo replays of it, and it was quite questionable. My main beef was that it was initially ruled a goal. This means that there must be DEFINITIVE EVIDNCE that it WASN'T a goal. Where was the definitive evidence? TSN sure didn't have it. Their replays showed it being questionable, able to go either way. Did the refs have another camera or something? And, if so, why didn't TSN have it? I dunno. I think it should have been allowed not necessarily because it was under the crossbar but because there wasn't definitive evidence to show that it didn't, to contradict the original ruling...I was at the game, and of course they don't show replays. But from where I was sitting (behind Garon) it looked like Elias' stick started high, but he moved it down to deflect the puck, and actually deflected it up into the net (impossible to do from above the crossbar) to tell you the truth, it didn't even look close. I was so disgusted when they took that goal away, and I had a feeling they would from the moment they reviewed it.
#6
Posted 20 March 2004 - 12:49 AM
this was a metro game or I'd be sitting here recapping it now and screaming yes or
no on the goal
I saw CRASHER trip a kid on skates and then he stole the kids lunch money and slapped his mom when she came to pick him up.. All because the kid looked at his crease
CRASHER's official list of high stick victims from this forum:
gionta182, devilsfan26 .... WHO'S NEXT??
2005 Fantasy Football League Champion... Bow to my Football knowledge !!!!!!
2003-04 NJDevs.com winner of the Masterton Award for Dedication to the Devils(still proud of that one !)
4, Four (!?!?) Time (2005-2008) NJDevs.com winner of the Whoever the damn Award for the funniest poster in the land is named after...(geesh... post pressure, but I seem ok with it!)
TWO TIME (2005, 2006) Award Winner and the man who can show Jeremy Roenick what a REAL loudmouth is all about.... hell this mouth roars SO loud, they retired the DAMN AWARD!!!! But how do you be emotional about an award for being most emotional when you're sharing it?
2008 NJDevs Stanley Cup Winner for best overall poster... where's my damn ring?
June 6, 2007... the NHL dies just a little bit.....
.. April 20, 2008...it gets a little better
#7
Posted 20 March 2004 - 12:58 AM
OH YEAH BABY!!! NO GOALS (i think it was good LOL)
and
1-0 still woooooohoooo.lol....
we got lucky i think..lol
http://www.hfboards....?t=63340&page=4
That seals it for me. We were robbed.
2nd time in a row against Montreal. I really hope we don't face them in the postseason: too hard to beat them and the refs.
#8
Posted 20 March 2004 - 01:28 AM
#9
Posted 20 March 2004 - 01:38 AM
#10
Posted 20 March 2004 - 01:41 AM
I agree. This game was WIDE OPEN. Sure, not all sixty minutes, but the majority of them. Not boring whatsoever.That Hfboards Habs board is funny. Loads of breakaways and end to end action and they keep accusing the game of being boring and "hate to be a Devils fan." Man, what exactly do they want? I guess back in the good old days, the defensemen werent allowed to check and had they laces tied together
#11
Posted 20 March 2004 - 02:01 AM
I really don't think they watch the game, I think they're jealous of the Devils' success so they join the chorus. Half those guys don't even know what the neurtral zone trap is.
#12
Posted 20 March 2004 - 02:06 AM
#13
Posted 20 March 2004 - 02:10 AM
Pretty much. I do like going there because there are a ton of fans from every team, and it really gives you a good feel for the league. They do go overboard with the "futures" though. Half those guys would trade the best player on their team for a 1st round draft pick.HFBoards kind of suck, IMO. Eh, I'm over-simplifying....
#14
Posted 20 March 2004 - 02:20 AM
#15
Posted 20 March 2004 - 02:56 AM
-outstanding Battle NJD blogger HasanFigures I finally get comments on my piece and it's about the Rangers.
Battle Of New York
#16
Posted 20 March 2004 - 09:07 AM
#17
Posted 20 March 2004 - 10:52 AM
Those Devils are Damn Good... DAMN GOOD!!!!
#18
Posted 20 March 2004 - 01:23 PM
It doesn't matter if the blade was going down. This from rule 61 of the NHL Rule book:we were still screwed... it was a goal... the blade was going down... games should not be decided by an officials call like that... this was like a playoff game....
*NEW*
© An apparent goal scored by an attacking player when any part of his stick makes contact with the puck above the height of the crossbar of the goal frame shall not be allowed. The determining factor is where the puck makes contact with the stick. If the puck makes contact with the stick below the level of the crossbar and enters the goal, this goal shall be allowed.
A goal scored by a defending player who strikes the puck with his stick above the height of the crossbar of the goal frame shall be allowed.
#19
Posted 20 March 2004 - 01:38 PM
saw it on TV. that call could have gone either way. i think had his stick started out just a little lower, they would not have reversed itI was at the game, and of course they don't show replays. But from where I was sitting (behind Garon) it looked like Elias' stick started high, but he moved it down to deflect the puck, and actually deflected it up into the net (impossible to do from above the crossbar) to tell you the truth, it didn't even look close. I was so disgusted when they took that goal away, and I had a feeling they would from the moment they reviewed it.
#20
Posted 20 March 2004 - 02:00 PM
-outstanding Battle NJD blogger HasanFigures I finally get comments on my piece and it's about the Rangers.
Battle Of New York
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













