I doubt its possible but it would be cool to tag another member in thread to get them to give their opinion or to invite them to comment in that thread. For example, there is a discussion about a trade in a particular thread and say i want to get MemberX's opinion on the player. So i tag him and it shows in his messages that he was tagged. "Hey, MemberX, what do you think about playerY?"
Member Tagging in threads
Started by lucifer91, Jul 29 2011 08:47 AM
12 replies to this topic
#2
RowdyFan42
-
- Tech Support
-
- 12,537 posts
A Legend
Posted 29 July 2011 - 09:06 AM
You could just send him/her a PM. 
There IS a [member] tag, but it only links to a member's profile.
Example:
There IS a [member] tag, but it only links to a member's profile.
Example:
[member='RowdyFan42']RowdyFan42
of the Devils' mascot, NJ Devil, and 
of all mascots far and wide.IT IS VERY HARD TO WIN ONE STANLEY CUP, FORGET ABOUT THREE... and maybe it's high time some of you actually APPRECIATED THAT instead of treating it like it's some flipping birthright because for some random reason you rooted for the damn Devils!!!!!
AHLFans.net - American Hockey League fan forums
#3
DevsMan84
-
- Members
-
- 5,678 posts
Hall of Famer
Posted 29 July 2011 - 10:22 AM
I can see where you are coming from with this idea, but it sounds kinda annoying. I do not want someone to invite me to comment on a topic I might not have an interest really in it. Plus if I do not respond quickly to the invite, that might get the person who invited me all pissy.
#4
Masked Fan
-
- Members
-
- 4,991 posts
General Manager
Posted 29 July 2011 - 01:31 PM
I can see where you are coming from with this idea, but it sounds kinda annoying. I do not want someone to invite me to comment on a topic I might not have an interest really in it. Plus if I do not respond quickly to the invite, that might get the person who invited me all pissy.
And you KNOW EVERY ONE will be pounding down your keyboard to get YOUR key opinions on things, eh? 
Think Rowdy put it best, just pm em. I've done it before to ensure someone was aware of a topic I knew they'd want to see.
Over? Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it is!
Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!
2009 Chico
#5
DevsMan84
-
- Members
-
- 5,678 posts
Hall of Famer
Posted 29 July 2011 - 01:54 PM
Think Rowdy put it best, just pm em. I've done it before to ensure someone was aware of a topic I knew they'd want to see.
I am not worried about 1, I am worried about a couple of them. I don't want ANY.
PM is fine.
#6
Masked Fan
-
- Members
-
- 4,991 posts
General Manager
Posted 29 July 2011 - 04:36 PM
Over? Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it is!
Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!
2009 Chico
#7
sammyk
-
- Contributor
-
- 25,563 posts
Professional Googler
Posted 04 August 2011 - 04:34 PM
I can see where you are coming from with this idea, but it sounds kinda annoying. I do not want someone to invite me to comment on a topic I might not have an interest really in it. Plus if I do not respond quickly to the invite, that might get the person who invited me all pissy.
Well, who would want your opinion? I think you're safe.
Think Rowdy put it best, just pm em. I've done it before to ensure someone was aware of a topic I knew they'd want to see.
I miss those PMs.
This is how big your signature should be. Any larger and you are compensating.
#8
Masked Fan
-
- Members
-
- 4,991 posts
General Manager
Posted 04 August 2011 - 06:35 PM
I miss those PMs.
those?
Over? Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it is!
Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!
2009 Chico
#9
sammyk
-
- Contributor
-
- 25,563 posts
Professional Googler
Posted 04 August 2011 - 11:20 PM
Yes.
Those.
Those.
This is how big your signature should be. Any larger and you are compensating.
#10
Masked Fan
-
- Members
-
- 4,991 posts
General Manager
Posted 05 August 2011 - 01:25 AM
Chico runner-up indeed! 
Over? Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it is!
Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!
2009 Chico
#11
DevsMan84
-
- Members
-
- 5,678 posts
Hall of Famer
Posted 05 August 2011 - 11:19 AM
Well, who would want your opinion? I think you're safe.
Yeah I am not part of the super cool Sept '02 crowd. Damn I must not be cool like you!
#12
NJDevs4978
-
- Members
-
- 20,773 posts
A Legend
Posted 05 August 2011 - 11:35 AM
No thanks, this place is already too Facebook-ish as it is 
"The Devils have high standards, that's the difference. We have a standard to live up to every year, and a couple of teams in our area don't have the standards we do." - Pat Burns
The New Jersey Devils win Stanley Cups everywhere:
-NHL record for most road wins in the playoffs - 10-1 in '95 and 10-2 in '00
-NHL record for most home wins in the playoffs - 12-1 in '03
The New Jersey Devils win Stanley Cups everywhere:
-NHL record for most road wins in the playoffs - 10-1 in '95 and 10-2 in '00
-NHL record for most home wins in the playoffs - 12-1 in '03
#13
Masked Fan
-
- Members
-
- 4,991 posts
General Manager
Posted 05 August 2011 - 02:36 PM
Over? Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it is!
Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!
2009 Chico
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
