Jump to content

Photo

GDT: Toronto Maple Leafs @ New Jersey Devils


  • Please log in to reply
297 replies to this topic

#281 overtime98

overtime98

    General Manager

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,139 posts

Posted 03 November 2011 - 07:15 AM

Gotta score on the PP....... LOL.... See where that got us! power play isnt everything, power play scored goals and we still lost.
  • 0
New Jersey Devils 3 time Stanley Cup Champions 1995 - 2000 - 2003!

Posted Image

#282 Vic Rattlehead18

Vic Rattlehead18

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,486 posts

Posted 03 November 2011 - 07:28 AM

I really wondered if that was you!

What the hell actually happened, if you can share?


I don't even know. I noticed the fight from the fists swinging and the leaf fan beating the sh!t out of the devils fan. When I was bringing the devils fans up everyone was saying the leaf fan threw the first punch. When I brought the leaf fans up a devils fan came and said the devils fans started it. I just got done kicking the devils fans out from the fire lounge for trying to sneak over and knew they were really drunk already. The leaf fans told me the kids walked by and started talking sh!t and smacked him in the face. Somehow the devils fan slipped away from security, I think that's why the leaf fans were allowed to stay. But I really don't know why, my involvement ended after bringing them to security aand telling them what happened.
  • 0
Devils.

#283 NJCroMag

NJCroMag

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,433 posts

Posted 03 November 2011 - 07:41 AM

I found this exchange between Cangialosi and Chico particularly puzzling...

CHICO: "Has anybody ever actually seen an omelet before?"
CANGIALOSI: "Sure! I made one just this morning...with ham and cheese."
CHICO: "You can make them with cheese???"
  • 0
"A lot o' people don't realize what's really going on. They view life as a bunch o' unconnected incidents 'n things. They don't realize that there's this, like, lattice o' coincidence that lays on top o' everything. Give you an example; show you what I mean: suppose you're thinkin' about a plate o' shrimp. Suddenly someone'll say, like, plate, or shrimp, or plate o' shrimp out of the blue, no explanation. No point in lookin' for one, either. It's all part of a cosmic unconciousness."

#284 Colin226

Colin226

    Hall of Famer

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,134 posts

Posted 03 November 2011 - 07:48 AM

Again, our style of play is not conducive to scoring goals.. This perimeter crap is just not producing, and even when guys do shoot to get it on net they are shooting right into defenders.. You have got to get the puck to the net and have guys crashing.. You're trying to score goals by taking shots from the circle and beyond with a NHL goalie in net who isn't screened.. Hmmmm yeah that'll work!!

Oh but look.. Zubrus skates in hard, sends the puck at the net, Henrique gets a scoring chance, and Zubrus puts home his rebound.. Surprise surprise.. A typical Devils play on that would have been to either just dump and chase, or peel off and setup the perimeter..

This team needs a style change

********

Also, can we please change how we bring the puck into the zone?! It's pathetic! Tonight, watch how the Flyers do it.. The Devils look lethargic and dumb 90% of the time, but the Flyers are really good and bringing the puck in.. I can't stand seeing us just skate in and then give up the puck

Edited by Colin226, 03 November 2011 - 07:50 AM.

  • 0
Posted Image
Season Ticket Holder since '08 - '09
Section 226 - Row 2 - Seats 15 and 16

Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image

#285 njdevil26

njdevil26

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,333 posts

Posted 03 November 2011 - 08:11 AM

Also, can we please change how we bring the puck into the zone?! It's pathetic! Tonight, watch how the Flyers do it.. The Devils look lethargic and dumb 90% of the time, but the Flyers are really good and bringing the puck in.. I can't stand seeing us just skate in and then give up the puck



Just give it up and announce that you've retired your Devils jersey AND your genitals to become a Flyers fan for your girlfriend... it's not even like you're hiding it well anymore!
  • 0
TWITTER: www.twitter.com/timoninjd~ANDREW

#286 NJDevs4978

NJDevs4978

    A Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,643 posts

Posted 03 November 2011 - 08:19 AM

Just give it up and announce that you've retired your Devils jersey AND your genitals to become a Flyers fan for your girlfriend... it's not even like you're hiding it well anymore!


lol it's called envy. The Flyers have actual puck-moving defensemen and we don't. That's why they get the puck in the zone and we don't.
  • 0
"The Devils have high standards, that's the difference. We have a standard to live up to every year, and a couple of teams in our area don't have the standards we do." - Pat Burns

The New Jersey Devils win Stanley Cups everywhere:
-NHL record for most road wins in the playoffs - 10-1 in '95 and 10-2 in '00
-NHL record for most home wins in the playoffs - 12-1 in '03

#287 caron14

caron14

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,343 posts

Posted 03 November 2011 - 09:02 AM

lol it's called envy. The Flyers have actual puck-moving defensemen and we don't. That's why they get the puck in the zone and we don't.


We have one in Larsson
  • 0

#288 Marshall

Marshall

    Head Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,201 posts

Posted 03 November 2011 - 09:05 AM

Also, can we please change how we bring the puck into the zone?! It's pathetic! Tonight, watch how the Flyers do it.. The Devils look lethargic and dumb 90% of the time, but the Flyers are really good and bringing the puck in.. I can't stand seeing us just skate in and then give up the puck


I thought we did fine for the first two periods. Third I didn't watch but apparently it was dump and chase ad nauseum.
  • 0

Winner of the 2009-10 Slava Fetisov Award For Best International Poster
Winner of the 2011-2012 RD Avatar Award
believe2.jpg

www.numerartovertag.wordpress.com - An NHL Blog (in Swedish)


#289 Jerrydevil

Jerrydevil

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,890 posts

Posted 03 November 2011 - 09:10 AM

I said it before, but with this team's current makeup and talent level, if the can stay around .500 before Zajac comes back I'm happily taking it.


Even when Zajac comes back, this team has problems IMO. They don't work hard enough or effective enough as a unit. They don't inspire me at all. You want to talk about vanilla ... this team is as vanilla as vanilla can be. Hard to get into this team.

I found this exchange between Cangialosi and Chico particularly puzzling...

CHICO: "Has anybody ever actually seen an omelet before?"
CANGIALOSI: "Sure! I made one just this morning...with ham and cheese."
CHICO: "You can make them with cheese???"


LOL
  • 0

#290 devlman

devlman

    Head Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,816 posts

Posted 03 November 2011 - 10:36 AM

Again, our style of play is not conducive to scoring goals.. This perimeter crap is just not producing, and even when guys do shoot to get it on net they are shooting right into defenders.. You have got to get the puck to the net and have guys crashing.. You're trying to score goals by taking shots from the circle and beyond with a NHL goalie in net who isn't screened.. Hmmmm yeah that'll work!!


Agreed...and you just described the only style our highest paid player knows how to play.

Edited by devlman, 03 November 2011 - 10:37 AM.

  • 0

#291 Triumph

Triumph

    A Legend

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 26,880 posts

Posted 03 November 2011 - 10:39 AM

NJ had a ton of scoring chances last night despite not generating many shots. It's like Colin watched the opposite game from what I did.

Hint: A good portion of shots will come from outside and/or above the circles.
  • 0

http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
 


#292 devlman

devlman

    Head Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,816 posts

Posted 03 November 2011 - 11:51 AM

NJ had a ton of scoring chances last night despite not generating many shots. It's like Colin watched the opposite game from what I did.

Hint: A good portion of shots will come from outside and/or above the circles.


Hint: Scoring chances in the boxscore dont always mean genuine scoring chances. Most of the 'chances' they had were, like Colin said, from the top of the circle with the goalie getting a clean look. The team didnt really look a genuine threat offensively.

They had chances to score but the point is they should have had even more chances, and better ones at that, too.
  • 0

#293 jagknife

jagknife

    Assistant Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,403 posts

Posted 03 November 2011 - 12:15 PM

NJ had a ton of scoring chances last night despite not generating many shots. It's like Colin watched the opposite game from what I did.

Hint: A good portion of shots will come from outside and/or above the circles.


Exactly

How many of Kovy's good shots on goal were kicked out horrendously by Gustavsson only to have NO ONE anywhere near to put home the rebound?

I swear to god it was freaking aggravating as hell to watch him FINALLY connect on one-timers on the PP only to see no one there for the deposit. Watch that first power play again, he takes 3 one timed shots on net, 2 make it to the keeper, Steckel blocked the other into the corner. one rebound made it right to the high slot, but no one was anywhere near it. Should not happen on a PP.

Hint: Scoring chances in the boxscore dont always mean genuine scoring chances. Most of the 'chances' they had were, like Colin said, from the top of the circle with the goalie getting a clean look. The team didnt really look a genuine threat offensively.

They had chances to score but the point is they should have had even more chances, and better ones at that, too.


No question, that slow-dump-and-chase they went to in the 3rd was them throwing in the towel. First 2 periods they brought the attack to Toronto. I also felt like they stopped going high on Gustavsson where they were having a ton of success. Even during warmups, it was like every shot high on him went in.
  • 0

NewKeeperSig.png of each of Toronto's 6 shots on goal in Game 6


#294 Triumph

Triumph

    A Legend

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 26,880 posts

Posted 03 November 2011 - 12:32 PM

Hint: Scoring chances in the boxscore dont always mean genuine scoring chances. Most of the 'chances' they had were, like Colin said, from the top of the circle with the goalie getting a clean look. The team didnt really look a genuine threat offensively.

They had chances to score but the point is they should have had even more chances, and better ones at that, too.


no. you are thinking of kovalchuk one timers on the point, which i agree, weren't great chances. you are not thinking of sykora's breakaway, palmieri's shot off the fluky bounce, sykora's great drag move and wrist shot close in, the multitude of 2 on 1s and 3 on 2s NJ had. NJ got a ton of scoring chances for the few shots they did manage.
  • 0

http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
 


#295 CarpathianForest

CarpathianForest

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,661 posts

Posted 03 November 2011 - 12:57 PM

lol it's called envy. The Flyers have actual puck-moving defensemen and we don't. That's why they get the puck in the zone and we don't.


We do have puck moving defensemen. They're just referred to as not-so-good-at-puck-moving defensemen.
  • 0

screenshot-sml-40.jpg
 


#296 devlman

devlman

    Head Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,816 posts

Posted 03 November 2011 - 12:57 PM

no. you are thinking of kovalchuk one timers on the point, which i agree, weren't great chances. you are not thinking of sykora's breakaway, palmieri's shot off the fluky bounce, sykora's great drag move and wrist shot close in, the multitude of 2 on 1s and 3 on 2s NJ had. NJ got a ton of scoring chances for the few shots they did manage.


I am thinking of those, as well. You are thinking that Palmieri's fluke shot off the fluke bounce, and Sykora's drag move wrist shot constitute a high offensive set of chances. They do not. We didnt have a an abnormal amount of clear-cut 2 on 1's either. You also cant say well we were great offensively, and then follow it up with 'for the few shots they did manage'. If we generated a small number of shots then we werent that great offensively.

Again, the point is that not enough chances were created. Most of the board's frustration is also that even the Sykora/Palms chances were due to Toronto's mistakes and not from the Devils imposing their offensive presence/pressure on the game, either.
  • 0

#297 Triumph

Triumph

    A Legend

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 26,880 posts

Posted 03 November 2011 - 01:12 PM

I am thinking of those, as well. You are thinking that Palmieri's fluke shot off the fluke bounce, and Sykora's drag move wrist shot constitute a high offensive set of chances. They do not. We didnt have a an abnormal amount of clear-cut 2 on 1's either. You also cant say well we were great offensively, and then follow it up with 'for the few shots they did manage'. If we generated a small number of shots then we werent that great offensively.


I don't think the Devils played great offensively last night. They were especially horrible in the third period. But in the first two periods, they got a huge number of chances off the rush. The Devils had two breakaways in one game, when is the last time you saw that? I wouldn't be surprised if that's the first time that happened all year. The Devils had at least 2 2 on 1s. In the third, the Leafs stopped taking chances and NJ couldn't generate any zone pressure.

My point is that the Devils chance to shot ratio last night was much higher than it typically is. Which is why Colin's point doesn't make any sense to me - the Devils weren't shooting from distance last night.

Again, the point is that not enough chances were created. Most of the board's frustration is also that even the Sykora/Palms chances were due to Toronto's mistakes and not from the Devils imposing their offensive presence/pressure on the game, either.


Most offensive chances are going to be because of opponents' mistakes. The key is forcing them into those mistakes.
  • 0

http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
 


#298 devlman

devlman

    Head Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,816 posts

Posted 03 November 2011 - 01:43 PM

Most offensive chances are going to be because of opponents' mistakes. The key is forcing them into those mistakes.


Which we did not do enough of. Even if you say our chances to shots ratio was high that doesnt mean much if we didnt have alot of shots. Fans want offensive chances coming from sustained pressure puck movement.

Edited by devlman, 03 November 2011 - 01:44 PM.

  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users