Volchenkov Hit had it been Daneyko...
#1
Posted 22 November 2011 - 05:54 PM
Just a fun topic to discuss...
Let's chat away...
#2
Posted 22 November 2011 - 06:09 PM
Newark: The City of New Jersey
#3
Posted 22 November 2011 - 06:09 PM
If the lacerations were severe enough to keep him out, Im gonna go ahead and assume they were some serious cuts

-This is Team-
Anyone who says, ‘You played in that New York area,’ I say, ‘No, I played in New Jersey.’ - Ken Daneyko
#4
Posted 22 November 2011 - 06:11 PM
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#5
Posted 23 November 2011 - 06:22 AM
We saw Volchenkov take a hard hit from Matthias. Had Daneyko taken that same hit, and sustained "lascerations," would he have come back for the 2nd period?
Just a fun topic to discuss...
Let's chat away...
Not a fun topic, trainers often times won't let players return these days. You risk damaging a valuable asset. It is also clear you don't know half the story.
#6
Posted 23 November 2011 - 08:11 AM

"I don't like those Rangers fans from New Jersey." - Jim Dowd
#7
Posted 23 November 2011 - 08:44 AM
#8
Posted 23 November 2011 - 10:07 AM
by the way - it's not the facial cuts that kept him out. it was the whiplash to his neck that did. if you recall, the took a puck in the face earlier this year, got 12 stitches to his face and was back out there.

_________________________________________________________________
“They’re the ones that makes it happen,” Lemaire said. “It’s not us. It’s not me. It’s not the other guy. It’s not the guy before. It’s not the guy after. It’s them. And they have to take care of business.”
-
Shameless Business Plug - Shop at Capitol Lighting and
1-800lighting.com - Use code NJDEVS10 for 10% OFF
#9
Posted 23 November 2011 - 10:17 AM
volchenkov is one of the toughest guys in the league. he's fragile in that he gets hurt a fair amount but they're legit injuries. this guy isn't sitting out because of a hangnail.
dito this and i think its unfair to put him up against Dano in one instance and even era's its different
this should be added for the people for the people who need a second look
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVpgV8ttCqs&feature=feedu
#10
Posted 23 November 2011 - 11:14 AM
Just sayin'. Maybe I misunderstand the rule.

-This is Team-
Anyone who says, ‘You played in that New York area,’ I say, ‘No, I played in New Jersey.’ - Ken Daneyko
#11
Posted 23 November 2011 - 11:27 AM
do you really think that this is some player who can't play with pain or are you commenting on the era? volchenkov is one of the toughest guys in the league. he's fragile in that he gets hurt a fair amount but they're legit injuries. this guy isn't sitting out because of a hangnail.
by the way - it's not the facial cuts that kept him out. it was the whiplash to his neck that did. if you recall, the took a puck in the face earlier this year, got 12 stitches to his face and was back out there.
I was referring to the "era" of hockey and how Dano would compare...
#12
Posted 23 November 2011 - 12:55 PM
#13
Posted 23 November 2011 - 12:56 PM
Define charging? More than 3 strides? He deliberately skated in from the blueline to hit the Tank up high.
Just sayin'. Maybe I misunderstand the rule.
and we get a penalty for Kovy giving a shove to the pussycat. That was fcking stupid officiating.
#14
Posted 23 November 2011 - 04:05 PM
Define charging? More than 3 strides? He deliberately skated in from the blueline to hit the Tank up high.
Just sayin'. Maybe I misunderstand the rule.
I didn't notice that when I saw it last night, but looking at it again here, you can definitely see him lock on target from the blue line. Usually a player will take those strides, then glide into the check, but he seemed to take 3 or 4 strides right up to when he hit Volchenkov. Charging is a very undercalled penalty. I see it happen, not often, but it does happen and it seems it rarely gets called for some reason.
#15
Posted 23 November 2011 - 04:10 PM
You don't turn this around in a couple shifts. Its going to take a little time, but I know the guys will come back. Because I can see it. -- Jacques Lemaire
#16
Posted 23 November 2011 - 05:09 PM
That said, it should have been a penalty for charging.
Giving Kovalchuk a penalty for running into Matthias and falling down should be an embarrassment to the official that called it.
Edited by Exit56, 23 November 2011 - 05:10 PM.
#17
Posted 23 November 2011 - 10:21 PM
#18
Posted 28 November 2011 - 09:53 AM
Over? Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it is!
Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!
2009 Chico
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users















