I believe there would be more than one flight more up to canada. And the extra flight distances add up to alot of dough
They're saying that there may be longer road trips next season so that does help to keep a lot of flights shorter
Posted 05 December 2011 - 11:19 PM
I believe there would be more than one flight more up to canada. And the extra flight distances add up to alot of dough

Posted 05 December 2011 - 11:24 PM
They're saying that there may be longer road trips next season so that does help to keep a lot of flights shorter
Posted 05 December 2011 - 11:24 PM
Posted 05 December 2011 - 11:27 PM
That can't be good for attendance, league wide - having more homestands. Ideally, you'd want those home dates spaced out a bit.

Posted 05 December 2011 - 11:28 PM
These changes had more to do with geography and TV markets than it did with Winnipeg. I think Winnipeg was just the thing that set this in motion since they haven't had an ideal time to make these changes until now. Teams like Detroit and Columbus have already expressed their pleasure with this.I see what you're trying to say but how does detroit, Columbus, minnesota benefit from being in a Division with dallas? Is detroit better off today? Did they get their wish? If the NHL made these changes to help geographically and with tv markets then I'd understand but it seems they just messed around to fit Winnipeg.
Posted 05 December 2011 - 11:34 PM
These changes had more to do with geography and TV markets than it did with Winnipeg. I think Winnipeg was just the thing that set this in motion since they haven't had an ideal time to make these changes until now. Teams like Detroit and Columbus have already expressed their pleasure with this.
https://twitter.com/#!/CraigCustance/status/143887959589011456
"Red Wings fans who aren't happy with the realignment plan, know that your GM is. "We're thrilled," Ken Holland said."
https://twitter.com/#!/CraigCustance/status/143879718997987331
"Scott Howson among the most pleased with realignment decision: "This was the best compromise.""
Plus Detroit could still potentially move again to an Eastern conference as they both have just 7 teams at the moment. I wouldn't be shocked to see that happen if the Coyotes don't move or if the league looks into expansion (as the rumors are starting). A simple 1 for 1 switch with Winnipeg and another team would have left a lot of teams upset so I think this was a necessary compromise.
Posted 05 December 2011 - 11:51 PM
Posted 05 December 2011 - 11:52 PM
Posted 05 December 2011 - 11:55 PM
"The Wild is thrilled with the NHL's realignment plan. This restores more traditional and regional rivalries with Chicago, Dallas, Detroit, St. Louis and Winnipeg. In addition, more Wild fans will be able to watch road games as a result of having more of our conference opponents playing in the Central time zone."
Posted 05 December 2011 - 11:57 PM

Posted 06 December 2011 - 12:00 AM
First choice for new NHL conference (read: division) names: Howe, Orr, Gretzky, Lemieux. Second choice: Howe, Anderson, Bruford, Wakeman.
of each of Toronto's 6 shots on goal in Game 6
Deviling the Details - A feeble attempt at being a hockey writer.
Posted 06 December 2011 - 12:02 AM
Posted 06 December 2011 - 12:06 AM
Edited by NewarkDevil5, 06 December 2011 - 12:07 AM.
Newark: The City of New Jersey
Posted 06 December 2011 - 12:40 AM
of the Devils' mascot, NJ Devil, and
of all mascots far and wide.IT IS VERY HARD TO WIN ONE STANLEY CUP, FORGET ABOUT THREE... and maybe it's high time some of you actually APPRECIATED THAT instead of treating it like it's some flipping birthright because for some random reason you rooted for the damn Devils!!!!!
Posted 06 December 2011 - 12:44 AM
Posted 06 December 2011 - 12:54 AM
Edited by ben00rs, 06 December 2011 - 01:23 AM.
Co-
of Ilya Kovalchuk
Proud to be King of the Kovalnuts (Est. June 2010 by MantaRay)
Posted 06 December 2011 - 01:15 AM
I think one reason the league kept both Eastern conferences with 7 teams is so that if Coyotes move to Quebec, that can be the eighth team in the conference with the Northeastern + Florida teams. Thus each Western and Eastern areas would have conferences of 8 and 7 teams.I can't wait until Phoenix moves to Quebec and they screw up the realignment before it starts
Edited by thefiestygoat, 06 December 2011 - 01:17 AM.
Posted 06 December 2011 - 03:19 AM
If we wind up in the Gretzky or Lemieux Conference I will
I think one reason the league kept both Eastern conferences with 7 teams is so that if Coyotes move to Quebec, that can be the eighth team in the conference with the Northeastern + Florida teams. Thus each Western and Eastern areas would have conferences of 8 and 7 teams.
Edited by Marshall, 06 December 2011 - 03:19 AM.
Posted 06 December 2011 - 03:25 AM
That's true, but how bumpy your road to the final four is becomes very dependent on how strong your division is. If you're in an easy division, you have two rounds against your crappy division rivals and then you have a 50% chance of playing for the Cup. The current system still favors teams with easy divisions, but at least the conference playoffs help eliminate that.I disagree, at the end of the day the team who wins the Cup will have played 4 rounds and won all of them and will have beaten teams that have beaten the best that their conference could put up. I don't see the problem being the "best overall team" because if you win 4 rounds in just about any playoff system you will have earned it.
I'm not a big fan of these changes and I know you hate everything that has to do with Winnipeg, but it's not like Winnipeg came in and told the league what to do here.No more chance of a devs rags, flyers, pens, caps conference finals. There just wasn't a need to change the system. Screw Winnipeg. Hockey is growing at a great rate now. Why risk screwing around with things
Edited by devilsfan26, 06 December 2011 - 03:26 AM.
Posted 06 December 2011 - 06:29 AM
Section 114 & Kovy's Second Contract
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users