well im just guessing.You mean a trade involving the Devs?
Trade Rumors and minor team trades.
#421
Posted 23 February 2012 - 03:00 PM
#422
Posted 23 February 2012 - 03:09 PM
One rumor that seems to be gaining traction is the Sharks going after BOTH Carter and Nash. I dont buy that, but the Sharks have proven their willingness to do crazy sh!t.
I have no idea how they would swing that. I guess like Marleau, Couture, and Murray going the other way? Whatever the case, that would probably be the biggest non-Gretzky trade in NHL history.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#423
Posted 23 February 2012 - 03:38 PM
https://twitter.com/#!/hhr_hockey
NJ & STL have picked up their interest in Pahlsson. NJ also spoke with Kings regarding Jarret Stoll...more to come
DEVILS: Could see Lou bring in a defencemen named Visnovky, Hamrlik or Zidlicky. Lubo is at the top of their List. Hamrlik interest from STL
#424
Posted 23 February 2012 - 03:57 PM
www.SterioDesign.com
Who is it gonna be?

#425
Posted 23 February 2012 - 04:00 PM
#426
Posted 23 February 2012 - 04:01 PM
I have no clue if this person is credible. I'm guessing this guy isn't but anways..
https://twitter.com/#!/hhr_hockey
He appears to be an adherent to the E.K.L.U.N.D. System.

I collect spores, molds and fungus.
Hello fellow American. This you should vote me. I leave power. Good. Thank you, thank you. If you vote me, I'm hot. What? Taxes, they'll be lower... son. The Democratic vote is the right thing to do Philadelphia, so do.
How do you spot risk? How do you avoid risk? And what makes it so risky?
#427
Posted 23 February 2012 - 04:03 PM
Im really not big on Tallinder. He has many wtf moments and is very weak along the boards sometimes. I also thought he would of brought a more offensive game when we signed him. I would package him and Tedenby for someone.at this point im not even sure that we should make a trade really, we're winning now against big teams and we're eventually getting Zajac, Larsson and Tallinder back (means we'll be getting rid of our dead weight but still have it in case) and thats all without giving up anything.
Edited by Zubie#8, 23 February 2012 - 04:04 PM.
“I think winning against them in the big stage, not just for me, but for the fans of New Jersey, people that are supporting us and always take a second seat to these guys for whatever reason, now they’ve got to be pretty happy going to work and going to school and doing all their things that they do." - Martin Brodeur
#428
Posted 23 February 2012 - 04:07 PM
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Edited by jamieleewv, 23 February 2012 - 04:08 PM.
#429
Posted 23 February 2012 - 04:12 PM
I have no clue if this person is credible. I'm guessing this guy isn't but anways..
https://twitter.com/#!/hhr_hockey
LOL and this one too:
https://twitter.com/#!/TheNHLTradeWire
#430
Posted 23 February 2012 - 04:19 PM
Im really not big on Tallinder. He has many wtf moments and is very weak along the boards sometimes. I also thought he would of brought a more offensive game when we signed him. I would package him and Tedenby for someone.
yeah i dont like him either but who could you get ? depending if we go for a UFA or a signed player too... not too sure i'd give up Tedenby for a rental and then we dont make it out of the first round and we lost a potential good player and the other guy doesnt resign with us
i'd rather package Palmieri + Tallinder + Corrente + 2nd/3rd for a dman... i think we could get a decent return for that... maybe a real good rental or an above average signed player or a good prospect who need a change of scenery or something
www.SterioDesign.com
Who is it gonna be?

#431
Posted 23 February 2012 - 04:36 PM
Like a Luke Schenn? Imagine him and the a-train paired together? Hit parade I tells ya, hit parade.yeah i dont like him either but who could you get ? depending if we go for a UFA or a signed player too... not too sure i'd give up Tedenby for a rental and then we dont make it out of the first round and we lost a potential good player and the other guy doesnt resign with us
i'd rather package Palmieri + Tallinder + Corrente + 2nd/3rd for a dman... i think we could get a decent return for that... maybe a real good rental or an above average signed player or a good prospect who need a change of scenery or something
#432
Posted 23 February 2012 - 04:46 PM
Who, exactly, do you think a package of Tallinder (currently hurt for the foreseeable future) + Palmieri (currently playing 4th line minutes) + Tedenby (literally did nothing at the NHL level this year, value has hit an all-time low) + a late 2nd/3rd round pick will get the Devils?
Other GMs aren't stupid; they aren't going to package a top-pairing D-man for our scraps

-This is Team-
Anyone who says, ‘You played in that New York area,’ I say, ‘No, I played in New Jersey.’ - Ken Daneyko
#433
Posted 23 February 2012 - 04:48 PM
The New Jersey Devils win Stanley Cups everywhere:
-NHL record for most road wins in the playoffs - 10-1 in '95 and 10-2 in '00
-NHL record for most home wins in the playoffs - 12-1 in '03
#434
Posted 23 February 2012 - 04:54 PM
Tallinder can handle lots of minutes and makes less than $3.5 mil/year. I'd rather see the Devils keep him.
As for a package of something like Palmieri + Corrente + Tallinder + 2nd for a rental player, that's actually overpaying for most of the names out there. A team like Edmonton would likely take a return like that for Hemsky - a top-4 minute defender, another young forward, a depth defender, and a 2nd rounder (probably Washington's) for a guy they aren't likely to re-sign and who is no longer relied on to carry the offense? That's overpaying.
Also, Pahlsson? Really? If the Devils make a move to get Pahlsson it will be like Lamoriello admitting he still wishes it was 2004. Pahlsson's always been overrated and at this point in his career he's a 4th liner - making $2.65mil.
Sergei Brylin Award Winner: '04-'05, '05-'06
RD Avatar Award Winner: '05-'06, '06-'07, '07-'08, '09-'10
Thanks to LüZZo for the avatar!
"How can it be bullsh!t to state a preference?"
#435
Posted 23 February 2012 - 05:01 PM
Like a Luke Schenn? Imagine him and the a-train paired together? Hit parade I tells ya, hit parade.
if we'd be trading with Toronto i know Burke likes big guys so Palmieri could work but i think Wilson would like Tedenby a lot since their games is based on fast breakout and players skating full speed and that's Tedenby right there
i think Schenn is really overated and overpaid for what he's doing but theres 3 guys on toronto's blueline that i wouldnt mind
Gunnarson is a good PMD and can be solid but he's not too physical ( $1.3m signed for next season too) 21pts - 25 years old /
Gardiner is a good skater and good offensively but he's so small ( $875k first year of his entry-level contract) 25 pts - 21 years old
Franson is an offensive right handed shooter with a good shot who can run the powerplay ( $800k RFA this summer ) 27pts - 24 years old
obviously i doubt Burke would let one of those go and i think we need more experience but i'd still like to get one of those for the right price
www.SterioDesign.com
Who is it gonna be?

#436
Posted 23 February 2012 - 05:10 PM
Here's the thing people (and it's been said before):
Who, exactly, do you think a package of Tallinder (currently hurt for the foreseeable future) + Palmieri (currently playing 4th line minutes) + Tedenby (literally did nothing at the NHL level this year, value has hit an all-time low) + a late 2nd/3rd round pick will get the Devils?
Other GMs aren't stupid; they aren't going to package a top-pairing D-man for our scraps
Well i never said it could get us a current top pairing guy but i think we could get a really decent younger guy with good upsides who could bring as much production as Tallinder now and we'd be dumping salary.
as for Palmieri and Teddy i think it's safe to say that Tedenby can produce in the NHL cause he's not a 3rd-4th line player but im sure he could do well somewhere else where he'd be given the chance and Palmieri well... he's big ? lol some could bite
www.SterioDesign.com
Who is it gonna be?

#437
Posted 23 February 2012 - 05:46 PM
www.SterioDesign.com
Who is it gonna be?

#438
Posted 23 February 2012 - 06:13 PM
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#439
Posted 23 February 2012 - 07:15 PM
They do need a center to play with Nash. Anyone to play with Nash.
#440
Posted 23 February 2012 - 07:18 PM
Ewww. Jack Johnson is probably worse at d than foster isJack Johnson and a first for Carter? I can live with that if you're CLB. Johnson can anchor the D.
They do need a center to play with Nash. Anyone to play with Nash.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











