Jump to content

Photo

2 Toronto Businessmen Intersted in Partially Owning the Devils?


  • Please log in to reply
52 replies to this topic

#21 ghdi

ghdi

    General Manager

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,393 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 06:39 PM

They aren't moving. 30-year lease, value in the arena, tv contract and the new owners would be taking over for Chambers in a partial manner, not majority control.


If something occurred where JVB had to sell off his share to these two dipsh!ts, then it could become fearful, but I agree its a stretch. I imagine there would be major conditions to these guys buying in.
  • 0

#22 Triumph

Triumph

    A Legend

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 27,493 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 06:44 PM

With Seattle, Kansas City, and Quebec City on the list of potential NHL destinations, you can just forget about putting a 2nd team in the Greater Toronto Area. It's something that should've happened between 1970-1995, but it didn't, so that's over with.

That said, the Devils need investors who aren't Vanderbeek because it is clear that he doesn't have the cash to own 100% of this team, or he'd have it already.
  • 0

http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
 


#23 SterioDesign

SterioDesign

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,702 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 06:59 PM

well that they live in Toronto does it really means anything?

there's american business guy owning parts of soccer team in Europe so not a stretch to own parts of a team like a few hours away from your head office
  • 0

www.SterioDesign.com

 


#24 ghdi

ghdi

    General Manager

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,393 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 07:00 PM

That said, the Devils need investors who aren't Vanderbeek because it is clear that he doesn't have the cash to own 100% of this team, or he'd have it already.


IMO within 10 yrs JVB is back to being a fan.
  • 0

#25 Daniel

Daniel

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,616 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 07:06 PM

IMO within 10 yrs JVB is back to being a fan.


Much sooner than that,
  • 0
Posted Image
I collect spores, molds and fungus.
Hello fellow American. This you should vote me. I leave power. Good. Thank you, thank you. If you vote me, I'm hot. What? Taxes, they'll be lower... son. The Democratic vote is the right thing to do Philadelphia, so do.
How do you spot risk? How do you avoid risk? And what makes it so risky?

#26 NJDevs4978

NJDevs4978

    A Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,031 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 07:37 PM

Bad news.


God, you are just full of your usual cheer today.

I don't know what you think is going to happen. Even if someone 'eventually' buys the team that wants to move it (for now this is clearly short-term capital and I'm sure they'll have a stipulation that allows them to buy majority control if certain conditions aren't met), the team is tied to the arena and TV contract for like 25 years.

Not to mention the NHL doesn't want a team in Toronto or Hamilton (neither do the Leafs or Sabres) - where these guys would want to move it ostensibly. Maybe Vanderbeek's going under eventually, maybe he isn't...you don't know his finances any more than we do.
  • 0
"The Devils have high standards, that's the difference. We have a standard to live up to every year, and a couple of teams in our area don't have the standards we do." - Pat Burns

The New Jersey Devils win Stanley Cups everywhere:
-NHL record for most road wins in the playoffs - 10-1 in '95 and 10-2 in '00
-NHL record for most home wins in the playoffs - 12-1 in '03

#27 njdevsftw

njdevsftw

    Senior Devil

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 782 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 08:07 PM

5 of the top 6 teams in the NHL in terms of revenue are Canadian. The biggest hockey market in the world, by far, is in Toronto. NY supports 3 teams and LA supports 2.. Toronto has more then enough hockey crazed fans to support 2 teams.. I've read numerous articles with local businessmen, sports analysts and NHL representatives stating that a 2nd team in Toronto being a financial success is a no-brainer. The Leafs organization may have some objections (and they would likely be compensated in some way), but realistically they wouldn't be threatened when you consider the history and current position of the Leafs. In fact a city rivalry may actually be beneficial.

"There's massive appetite for a second team in Toronto," said Global managing partner Don Mayo. "There's about 800,000 people in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) right now that have NHL hockey as a passion that haven't been able to attend a hockey game in the past two years."

Having the NHL's largest Canadian market all to themselves has been very good for the Leafs. But would they be hurt if another team set up shop nearby? The fact is, some of the richest franchises around share markets with other teams in the same sport. The New York Yankees, New York Rangers, Los Angeles Lakers and Chicago Cubs are all prime examples - and none seem to have suffered one bit.

"I would expect that Toronto's got enough capacity for at least two teams, maybe two-and-a-half," said Harrison.

"They could put a second NHL team in, possibly even a third NHL team in with the demand in the GTA area," added Mayo.

"Sports analyst 'guarantees' 2nd NHL team in Toronto"

Two more NHL governors said the league should put a second team in Toronto, although one of them said it should be by relocating an existing franchise rather than expanding.

"I don't think it can be an expansion team," a governor said. "We can't expand because we would be the laughingstock of professional sports. "We've got too many troubled franchises. We've got to look at relocating a couple of them. These franchises were troubled long before the economic downturn and next year is going to be worse on them."

And what about Hamilton, so often mentioned as a future NHL city and nearly the home of the Nashville Predators? For one, it would hurt the Buffalo Sabres. But this argument made us laugh:

"It's a minor-league town," the governor said of Hamilton. "How could we sell a team from Hamilton? Do you think the New York Rangers want to put the Hamilton Steelers on their marquee at Madison Square Garden? Do you think anyone in Manhattan would buy tickets to see them?"


I could insert a million quotes but those sum it up more or less.

Edited by njdevsftw, 27 February 2012 - 08:10 PM.

  • 0
Posted Image

#28 Daniel

Daniel

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,616 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 08:23 PM

God, you are just full of your usual cheer today.

I don't know what you think is going to happen. Even if someone 'eventually' buys the team that wants to move it (for now this is clearly short-term capital and I'm sure they'll have a stipulation that allows them to buy majority control if certain conditions aren't met), the team is tied to the arena and TV contract for like 25 years.

Not to mention the NHL doesn't want a team in Toronto or Hamilton (neither do the Leafs or Sabres) - where these guys would want to move it ostensibly. Maybe Vanderbeek's going under eventually, maybe he isn't...you don't know his finances any more than we do.


If you've got enough money you and you own the team, you can move. It's just a matter of whether you have enough money to buy out the lease.

And you don't need to be VBK's auditor to know the team is in serious financial condition. Again, the team is in default and no one really expects them to be able to come up with an $80 million check. That's not to mention the even bigger loan that matures in a few years.
  • 0
Posted Image
I collect spores, molds and fungus.
Hello fellow American. This you should vote me. I leave power. Good. Thank you, thank you. If you vote me, I'm hot. What? Taxes, they'll be lower... son. The Democratic vote is the right thing to do Philadelphia, so do.
How do you spot risk? How do you avoid risk? And what makes it so risky?

#29 Triumph

Triumph

    A Legend

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 27,493 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 10:36 PM

To buy the team, move it to Toronto, and break the lease and TV contract - I dunno, that would cost at least $500 million, and probably closer to $1 billion. A second team isn't coming to Toronto.

Edited by Triumph, 27 February 2012 - 10:39 PM.

  • 0

http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
 


#30 Quinn01

Quinn01

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,622 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 10:42 PM

"There's massive appetite for a second team in Toronto," said Global managing partner Don Mayo. "There's about 800,000 people in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) right now that have NHL hockey as a passion that haven't been able to attend a hockey game in the past two years."


How are they surviving up there with going 2 years without going to a game? Jesus. This is worse then I thought. :rolleyes:
  • 1

Posted Image
Winner of the 2010-2011 Hobey Baker Award for Best Rookie Poster.
Official Keeper of Martin Brodeur's Ending Powerplay Whistle & KOVALtine, the drink with the shelf life of 15 years.


#31 sundstrom

sundstrom

    Hall of Famer

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,246 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 10:45 PM

To buy the team, move it to Toronto, and break the lease and TV contract - I dunno, that would cost at least $500 million, and probably closer to $1 billion. A second team isn't coming to Toronto.


this is 100% true and should end this discussion right now.
  • 0

"This team was never the same once we lost Patrik Sundstrom"- Lou Lamoriello


20082719943.png
_________________________________________________________________
“They’re the ones that makes it happen,” Lemaire said. “It’s not us. It’s not me. It’s not the other guy. It’s not the guy before. It’s not the guy after. It’s them. And they have to take care of business.”
-
"I guess I just miss my friend" (#28)


#32 njdevsftw

njdevsftw

    Senior Devil

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 782 posts

Posted 28 February 2012 - 06:57 AM

this is 100% true and should end this discussion right now.


I think a 2nd team is coming to Toronto.. I don't think it's the Devils though. :)
  • 0
Posted Image

#33 Devil Dan 56

Devil Dan 56

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,673 posts

Posted 28 February 2012 - 10:26 AM

Toronto may very well be able to support another team, but the NHL is pretty dead set against moving teams unless it absolutely has to. And that's especially true when the team has a lucrative TV deal AND is tied to a brand new arena.
  • 0
Official NJDevs.com Keeper of Gory Corey Schwab, Mike Peluso, Troy Crowder, Jeff Frazee, and Rich Shulmistra.
"The Devils are that zombie that takes an ax to the skull, a bullet to the temple and is set on fire … and yet keeps lumbering along to the annoyance of all the other zombies." - Puck Daddy

#34 Triumph

Triumph

    A Legend

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 27,493 posts

Posted 28 February 2012 - 10:34 AM

Toronto can absolutely support another team, but the Leafs and the NHL will not allow another team into the Greater Toronto Area unless they pay an incredible amount of money to the Leafs (and probably the Sabres too). That's not happening.

In addition, one problem with the salary cap that needs addressing is the fact that teams would be actively against a 2nd Toronto team because of the revenue it would generate.
  • 0

http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
 


#35 mxm262

mxm262

    Albany Devil

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 236 posts

Posted 28 February 2012 - 12:20 PM

Isn't the guy who bought the Stars from Vancouver or something? Could just be some guys who want a piece of a team and there aren't many availalbe close to home.
  • 0

#36 BCdevil

BCdevil

    Senior Devil

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 611 posts

Posted 28 February 2012 - 12:31 PM

If (when?) they put a second team in Toronto, it will be through expansion. The league wants that payday for itself.

In general, breaking the lease/TV contract is only a matter of $. There is only one thing that could stop the team from moving if someone broke the bank and Vanderbeek agreed and that is league approval. I don't want to know if the owners would give it.
  • 0
Posted Image

#37 Aitchmack

Aitchmack

    Prospect

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 30 posts

Posted 28 February 2012 - 01:46 PM

Anyone that invests in a sports franchise wants a return for their investment. Either through long term profit, resale at a profit or because it's cheaper to buy an ailing business rather than to start one from scratch. Some use sports teams to promote other brands they own.

Until it's known who the potential investors are it's going to be virtually impossible to guess at their long term motives. And from all the things Ive read about the Devils they don't sound like a business that's going to get anyone rich in a hurry.

As for another franchise in Toronto could you imagine the rivalry there? It'd be intense for sure and would not only stimulate both teams it would push up the NHLs value as a whole to the TV stations. If the NHL are after a quick buck they'll sanction the move of a financial unstable franchise there. If they want to maximise their slice of the pie they'll go the expansion route.
  • 0

#38 njdevil26

njdevil26

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,336 posts

Posted 28 February 2012 - 06:07 PM

Everyone in the area is such a die hard Leaf fan. I highly doubt the fans that they claim can't go to Leaf games because of the demand for tickets is going to just all of a sudden stop being a fan of the team and switch to a new team.
  • 0

#39 MDPucks

MDPucks

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,415 posts

Posted 28 February 2012 - 06:22 PM

The Leafs have fought a Hamilton and/or Toronto 2 franchise tooth and nail because of their monopoly over events at the ACC. Another arena in suburban Markham (as rumored) would serve as competition. Copps Coliseum gives a little competition but its similar to TD Garden in Boston competing with the old Worcester Centrum.

Eventually the NHL will have to cave and open-up to a Toronto 2 franchise but I believe it'll be an expansion franchise. Why? All the owners get a piece of the massive expansion fee it'll command and the Leafs will get an ungodly territory fee. Hamilton is too close to Buffalo for the Sabres comfort so I believe it'll be Markham.

Seattle will end-up with the Coyotes because I believe the NHL doesn't want another cross-country relocation to Quebec City. That'll leave Quebec City and one out of Kansas City, Las Vegas, Houston, and perhaps even Phoenix II to get the other expansion team with the other getting the Islanders.

The Devils lease, television contract, and arena are what's going to keep the franchise anchored in Newark.
  • 0

#40 njdevsftw

njdevsftw

    Senior Devil

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 782 posts

Posted 28 February 2012 - 06:51 PM

Anyone that invests in a sports franchise wants a return for their investment.


You clearly don't follow European sports. :P
  • 0
Posted Image




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users