Anton Volchenkov
#1
Posted 28 February 2012 - 09:45 AM
This guy is awesome....willing to do anything to keep the puck out of the net
#2
Posted 28 February 2012 - 09:52 AM
#3
Posted 28 February 2012 - 10:05 AM
Winner of the 2011-2012 RD Avatar Award
#4
Posted 28 February 2012 - 10:38 AM

_________________________________________________________________
“They’re the ones that makes it happen,” Lemaire said. “It’s not us. It’s not me. It’s not the other guy. It’s not the guy before. It’s not the guy after. It’s them. And they have to take care of business.”
-
Shameless Business Plug - Shop at Capitol Lighting and
1-800lighting.com - Use code NJDEVS10 for 10% OFF
#5
Posted 28 February 2012 - 10:39 AM
Somebody's gotta be the hero... Why not me?
#6
Posted 28 February 2012 - 11:10 AM
If a player deliberately covers the puck, with his hand, in the crease, the opposing team is awarded a penalty shot.
What if a player covers the puck in the crease using other parts of his body? ie, laying on it as Volch did here
Edit: Nevermind, I just watched the video the whole way through. Not a PS unless the hand covers the puck
Edited by Devilsfan118, 28 February 2012 - 11:11 AM.

-This is Team-
Anyone who says, ‘You played in that New York area,’ I say, ‘No, I played in New Jersey.’ - Ken Daneyko
#7
Posted 28 February 2012 - 11:11 AM
Now here's a question:
If a player deliberately covers the puck, with his hand, in the crease, the opposing team is awarded a penalty shot.
What if a player covers the puck in the crease using other parts of his body? ie, laying on it as Volch did here
Edit: Nevermind, I just watched the video the whole way through. Not a PS unless the hand covers the puck
yep, legal, even if you squeeze it between your cheeks.
#8
Posted 28 February 2012 - 11:22 AM

Winner of the 2010-2011 Hobey Baker Award for Best Rookie Poster.
Official Keeper of Martin Brodeur's Ending Powerplay Whistle & KOVALtine, the drink with the shelf life of 15 years.
#9
Posted 28 February 2012 - 11:51 AM
#10
Posted 28 February 2012 - 11:55 AM
#11
Posted 28 February 2012 - 02:42 PM
i see it like this, Volchenkov provides solid D on a consistent basis and, on top of that, shows bursts of glory.Yeah he seems to have his bursts of glory here and there. I wish it was a tad more consistent. Marty definitely owed him a beer or two for that save last night though. I love when he hits too.
Somebody's gotta be the hero... Why not me?
#12
Posted 28 February 2012 - 02:45 PM
i see it like this, Volchenkov provides solid D on a consistent basis and, on top of that, shows bursts of glory.
fair assessment.

Winner of the 2010-2011 Hobey Baker Award for Best Rookie Poster.
Official Keeper of Martin Brodeur's Ending Powerplay Whistle & KOVALtine, the drink with the shelf life of 15 years.
#13
Posted 28 February 2012 - 02:51 PM
Part of the job, obviously, when blocks as many shots as he does. But still, I wish he wouldn't miss 20+ games a year

-This is Team-
Anyone who says, ‘You played in that New York area,’ I say, ‘No, I played in New Jersey.’ - Ken Daneyko
#14
Posted 28 February 2012 - 03:05 PM
#15
Posted 28 February 2012 - 03:06 PM
Stanley Cups 3 (1994–95, 1999–00, 2002–03)
Conference championships 5 (1994–95, 1999–00, 2000–01, 2002–03, 2011-12)
Division championships 9 (1996–97, 1997–98, 1998–99, 2000–01, 2002–03, 2005–06, 2006–07, 2008–09, 2009–10)
#16
Posted 28 February 2012 - 03:53 PM
a-train is the man, we could use 2 or 3 more guys like him,
Salmonbellies rule!
Hit 'em harder cops!
But a hockey team called the Mighty Ducks?
Aw, man.
#17
Posted 28 February 2012 - 04:41 PM
yep, legal, even if you squeeze it between your cheeks.
Actually, what Volch did should have been a penalty shot (squeezing the legs to cover the puck), but the ref missed it. Kerry Fraser explained today on TSN:
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=389080
I can only assume, that based on the delay by the referee in getting to the net, he did not see Volchenkov close his legs and cover the puck following the shot that would have appeared to go under the Devils defenceman's body.
Had the play been correctly observed in its entirety the 'something' you are wondering about should have been called a penalty shot.
#18
Posted 28 February 2012 - 04:43 PM
Actually, what Volch did should have been a penalty shot (squeezing the legs to cover the puck), but the ref missed it. Kerry Fraser explained today on TSN:
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=389080
Meh. Even if it had been awarded a penalty shot, the Rangers player probably would've just dumped the puck in and went off for a line change.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#19
Posted 28 February 2012 - 05:04 PM
"63.2 - Any player who drops to his knees to block a shot should not be penalized if the puck is shot under him or becomes lodged in his clothing or equipment but any use of the hands to make the puck unplayable should be penalized promptly."
Volch drops to block the shot, the puck ends up underneath him, and he does not use his hand to make the puck unplayable. So by 63.2 Volch is ok.
63.2 says only a hand may not be used once the puck is shot underneath the player and 63.5 says the player can never gather the puck under him. 63.2 seems to be the portion of the rules that should be used, since the puck was initially shot under Volch while attempting a shot block, so the key part of the play would be in not using his hand, not whether it was gathered beneath him or not.
-Terry Goodkind
Sex Panther cologne -- 50 percent of the time, it works every time.
-Anchorman
The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The second best time is now.
-Anonymous
Keeper of Section 212-213's wayward step
#20
Posted 28 February 2012 - 05:15 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













