GDT: Pens @ NJD 3/17/12
#101
Posted 17 March 2012 - 02:21 PM
#102
Posted 17 March 2012 - 02:23 PM
Pittsburgh Penguins: why tanking works!

-This is Team-
Anyone who says, ‘You played in that New York area,’ I say, ‘No, I played in New Jersey.’ - Ken Daneyko
#103
Posted 17 March 2012 - 02:24 PM
So, who feels confident about playing these new and improved penguins in the playoffs?
I'm hoping that they are "peaking at the wrong time."
#104
Posted 17 March 2012 - 02:26 PM
And seriously, Chico needs to shut the fvck up. I don't want to hear about how damn good the penguins are. If I cared, I'd watch the fvcking Pittsburgh feed! Jesus Christ..

-This is Team-
Anyone who says, ‘You played in that New York area,’ I say, ‘No, I played in New Jersey.’ - Ken Daneyko
#105
Posted 17 March 2012 - 02:30 PM
Is we have Kovy?
Section 114 & Kovy's Second Contract
#106
Posted 17 March 2012 - 02:33 PM
"We're Not Done Yet, Boys" -Ilya Kovalchuk
#107
Posted 17 March 2012 - 02:35 PM
LOL true but would you rather hear him go on and on how much this team has problems?Seems like the right time to peak, unfortunately.
And seriously, Chico needs to shut the fvck up. I don't want to hear about how damn good the penguins are. If I cared, I'd watch the fvcking Pittsburgh feed! Jesus Christ..
#108
Posted 17 March 2012 - 02:39 PM
No time to dwell on this, Rangers on Monday.
#109
Posted 17 March 2012 - 02:41 PM
Really sucks that a really good performance from Marty is wasted.
No time to dwell on this, Rangers on Monday.
this. at least they got a pair of goals in this one. gotta be ready for the rags though.
"We're Not Done Yet, Boys" -Ilya Kovalchuk
#110
Posted 17 March 2012 - 03:03 PM
#111
Posted 17 March 2012 - 03:11 PM
So I should just accept that and not be bothered when the call goes against us one time and for the other team another time?.. I feel much better thanks
How about being ticked at a team that no showed for 55 minutes instead of being mad the Pens didn't get screwed the way we did? At least 15 or 16 of the other 18 skaters should be doing Herbies after that lovely performance.
Edited by NJDevs4978, 17 March 2012 - 03:13 PM.
The New Jersey Devils win Stanley Cups everywhere:
-NHL record for most road wins in the playoffs - 10-1 in '95 and 10-2 in '00
-NHL record for most home wins in the playoffs - 12-1 in '03
#112
Posted 17 March 2012 - 03:17 PM
Wow what a disappointment. Did not expect this. That's fvcking outrageous.
This game screams first round exit.
What a bunch of fvcking pretenders.
Poor Marty.
Edited by ScoreMoreThan3, 17 March 2012 - 03:29 PM.
Stanley Cups 3 (1994–95, 1999–00, 2002–03)
Conference championships 5 (1994–95, 1999–00, 2000–01, 2002–03, 2011-12)
Division championships 9 (1996–97, 1997–98, 1998–99, 2000–01, 2002–03, 2005–06, 2006–07, 2008–09, 2009–10)
#113
Posted 17 March 2012 - 03:17 PM
Edited by devlman, 17 March 2012 - 03:20 PM.
#114
Posted 17 March 2012 - 03:23 PM
39/44 saves...I mean, statistically, it's still not very good (88.6%), but damn this game could've been 10-2

-This is Team-
Anyone who says, ‘You played in that New York area,’ I say, ‘No, I played in New Jersey.’ - Ken Daneyko
#115
Posted 17 March 2012 - 03:36 PM
How about being ticked at a team that no showed for 55 minutes instead of being mad the Pens didn't get screwed the way we did? At least 15 or 16 of the other 18 skaters should be doing Herbies after that lovely performance.
No one is saying this game is the refs fault. we were talking about the inconsistency of the kick ins. How does our poor performance relate to that topic?

Devils Fan since 1989
~~~
Season Ticket Holder since '08 - '09
Section 226 - Row 2 - Seats 15 and 16
~~~
#116
Posted 17 March 2012 - 03:42 PM
Really sucks that a really good performance from Marty is wasted.
No time to dwell on this, Rangers on Monday.
You sound like Chico and Dano "Marty played well the score could have been worse" Marty did have some great saves but they still scored 5 goals against, none were deflected off our guys sticks & none were put in by our guys. One GA was off a face off and Marty wasn't ready and set in goal before the face off, so they scored. Chico tried to blame Henrique because he lost the face off, wrong he did lose the face off but it was scored by winger. Marty missed some pucks that resulted in GA. There were, I think, 41 shots on goal and at least 21 good shots so why do I care if we lose by 5-2 or 15-2, it's a loss, period, I don't blow my load because Marty lost the game but save a potential 10 more GA.
The Pens are a great team. Malkin is having his best ever year, he is the best in the NHL. Fleury is a great goalie. I expect them to be tough. So I am sorry I don't think a 5-2 loss vs a 15-2 loss is outstanding for Marty.
#117
Posted 17 March 2012 - 04:02 PM
Good to know that after all these years, you still have no idea what you're looking at when you watch a hockey game.
of Orion. I've watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate.
All those moments will be lost in time... like tears in the rain.
#118
Posted 17 March 2012 - 04:02 PM
#119
Posted 17 March 2012 - 04:04 PM
You sound like Chico and Dano "Marty played well the score could have been worse" Marty did have some great saves but they still scored 5 goals against, none were deflected off our guys sticks & none were put in by our guys. One GA was off a face off and Marty wasn't ready and set in goal before the face off, so they scored. Chico tried to blame Henrique because he lost the face off, wrong he did lose the face off but it was scored by winger. Marty missed some pucks that resulted in GA. There were, I think, 41 shots on goal and at least 21 good shots so why do I care if we lose by 5-2 or 15-2, it's a loss, period, I don't blow my load because Marty lost the game but save a potential 10 more GA.
The Pens are a great team. Malkin is having his best ever year, he is the best in the NHL. Fleury is a great goalie. I expect them to be tough. So I am sorry I don't think a 5-2 loss vs a 15-2 loss is outstanding for Marty.
Okay, almost all of their goals were beautiful. Malkins goal was a nasty one timer, Cooke's was on a 2 on 1, Dupuis' was a laser, and the last one by Cooke essentially didn't matter. Basically, a few of them were completely unstoppable, and a few of them were "maybe" stoppabe, but if you're going to harp on Brodeur for this game then you're misplacing your anger. The team didn't show up around him. He did show up. So I am sorry that I mentioned he had a pretty good performance when considering what he was up against.
#120
Posted 17 March 2012 - 04:07 PM
Okay, almost all of their goals were beautiful. Malkins goal was a nasty one timer, Cooke's was on a 2 on 1, Dupuis' was a laser, and the last one by Cooke essentially didn't matter. Basically, a few of them were completely unstoppable, and a few of them were "maybe" stoppabe, but if you're going to harp on Brodeur for this game then you're misplacing your anger. The team didn't show up around him. He did show up. So I am sorry that I mentioned he had a pretty good performance when considering what he was up against.
Don't waste your time trying to explain anything to him, there is a reason why he has "Broken Record" under his name.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













