10 replies to this topic

[njdevsftw]

What do you guys think?

http://bleacherrepor...ght-now/page/91

Edited by njdevsftw, 23 April 2012 - 12:22 PM.

[Onddeck]

nothing wrong with a little love, ill take it

on Crosby being #1, "And he's better than his teammate, Evgeni Malkin, because it seems like that without Crosby's presence, the Penguins won't be able to make a run for the Stanley Cup."

[hargsy]

I didnt think the players were allowed to bet !

[Legion15]

not sure I agree Zach being all the way down at 42

[Martyisth3b3st]

Remember that one time a Bleacher-report article was worth reading?

lulzmeneither

[Neb00rs]

Remember that one time a Bleacher-report article was worth reading?

lulzmeneither

this.

[njdevsftw]

Remember that one time a Bleacher-report article was worth reading?

lulzmeneither

Personally I found this article way more interesting then your reply for example.

[halfsharkalligatorhalfman]

He's not played like it

[ghdi]

Personally I found this article way more interesting then your reply for example.

He's right though. Anyone can write for Bleacher Report. This article has barely any merit.

[njdevsftw]

Any ranking like this would be extremely subjective regardless of which media outlet published it. You think Burnside/LeBrun is always right? His comment added nothing to the thread whatsoever.

[ghdi]

Any ranking like this would be extremely subjective regardless of which media outlet published it. You think Burnside/LeBrun is always right? His comment added nothing to the thread whatsoever.

Sure, I get that and I see nothing wrong with posting it or discussing it, but Bleacher Report is derided, so anything with that URL is going to get scoffed at by many people. Not that Burnside/LeBrun aren't.