Is it bad that I have entirely forgotten Tallinder was on the team?http://blogs.northje...cky_day_to_day/
In Lou-speak, that means Z's arm is hanging off and he thinks he's back in the Czech Republic.
Zidlicky Injured?
#41
Posted 09 May 2012 - 04:00 PM
#42
Posted 09 May 2012 - 04:46 PM
Is it bad that I have entirely forgotten Tallinder was on the team?
Yeah. Tallinder is good.
#43
Posted 09 May 2012 - 05:15 PM
Lou stating Zidlicky is "day to day". If he can be believed, that's good news. Hopefully will only miss 1 game, if any.
Last person that was "day-to-day" was Zajac and Tallinder, and you know where that ended up...this is NOT good news.
#44
Posted 09 May 2012 - 05:16 PM
--John Buccigross
#45
Posted 09 May 2012 - 05:23 PM
Last person that was "day-to-day" was Zajac and Tallinder, and you know where that ended up...this is NOT good news.
Tallinder was day to day for like 2 hours. It was revealed he wouldn't play that night, then they announced he was out for several weeks.
Zajac was also never really day to day. In addition, lots of guys who were announced as day to day actually were - like Ryan Carter, Anton Volchenkov, Alexei Ponikarovsky, etc.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#46
Posted 09 May 2012 - 05:31 PM
Is it bad that I have entirely forgotten Tallinder was on the team?
Poor guy.
Co-
of Ilya Kovalchuk
Proud to be King of the Kovalnuts (Est. June 2010 by MantaRay)
#47
Posted 09 May 2012 - 05:35 PM
#48
Posted 09 May 2012 - 06:25 PM
how's his blood clot?...it must be getting better?
Edited by hargsy, 09 May 2012 - 06:26 PM.
#49
Posted 09 May 2012 - 10:53 PM
Anyway, I think I'd be more worried if the Zidlicky thing was lower body. That would be tougher to manage.
#50
Posted 10 May 2012 - 10:24 AM
Is Tallinder still alive ?
how's his blood clot?...it must be getting better?
http://www.theonion....-vomitin,19768/
http://www.theonion....bleeding,19835/
You don't turn this around in a couple shifts. Its going to take a little time, but I know the guys will come back. Because I can see it. -- Jacques Lemaire
#51
Posted 10 May 2012 - 10:52 AM
The New Jersey Devils win Stanley Cups everywhere:
-NHL record for most road wins in the playoffs - 10-1 in '95 and 10-2 in '00
-NHL record for most home wins in the playoffs - 12-1 in '03
#52
Posted 10 May 2012 - 11:30 AM
His offensive abilities have certainly helped us a good amount this playoff run, but I don't think his offensive talent has made up for his numerous mistakes defensively, or penalty wise.
#53
Posted 10 May 2012 - 12:20 PM

_________________________________________________________________
“They’re the ones that makes it happen,” Lemaire said. “It’s not us. It’s not me. It’s not the other guy. It’s not the guy before. It’s not the guy after. It’s them. And they have to take care of business.”
-
Shameless Business Plug - Shop at Capitol Lighting and
1-800lighting.com - Use code NJDEVS10 for 10% OFF
#54
Posted 10 May 2012 - 12:45 PM
I know I pretty much speak for myself here, but I am absolutely not a Zidlicky fan.
His offensive abilities have certainly helped us a good amount this playoff run, but I don't think his offensive talent has made up for his numerous mistakes defensively, or penalty wise.
imo they also wouldnt be in the 3rd round without the trade for zidlicky.
along with that trade you have to make the player they should have signed for a lower pairing is on the rangers defense. better hope that doesnt come back to haunt lamoriello.
#55
Posted 10 May 2012 - 12:50 PM
I know I pretty much speak for myself here, but I am absolutely not a Zidlicky fan.
His offensive abilities have certainly helped us a good amount this playoff run, but I don't think his offensive talent has made up for his numerous mistakes defensively, or penalty wise.
I was against the trade to get him in a big way (look at my history), but I'm happy to say I'm eating crow. He has been great for us, and he is a very big reason why we are where we are. Defensemen usually go under the radar so its harder to see their contribution in the grand scheme of things, but he has been a difference maker.
#56
Posted 10 May 2012 - 12:58 PM
imo they also wouldnt be in the 3rd round without the trade for zidlicky.
along with that trade you have to make the player they should have signed for a lower pairing is on the rangers defense. better hope that doesnt come back to haunt lamoriello.
stralman has been not good for the rangers in these playoffs. there's no haunting there at all.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#57
Posted 10 May 2012 - 01:08 PM
stralman has been not good for the rangers in these playoffs. there's no haunting there at all.
Here's just one article saying otherwise.
My link
stralman has had a solid playoffs for the role hes asked to play behind 3 of their top horses. i wouldnt expect you agree with that so no surprise there.
Edited by hockey3893498, 10 May 2012 - 01:14 PM.
#58
Posted 10 May 2012 - 01:18 PM
Here's just one article saying otherwise.
My link
stralman has been a solid pickup and hes had a nice playoffs for the role hes asked to play behind 3 of their top horses. i wouldnt expect you agree with that so no surprise there.
of course not, even though you're clearly a new poster and we're just getting to know each other.

stralman has been a back pairing defenseman given protected ice time and he's gotten some shots through. he's getting 17 minutes of ice time a game in the playoffs even though the rangers have played several overtime games. he is not a 'pivotal' player - he's BEEN pivotal because the rangers can't score worth a goddamn and stralman has been lucky enough to score 3 times. but tortorella doesn't trust him in key situations at all.
zidlicky has led the devils in ice time, quarterbacked the power play, hasn't been protected at all, and has done real well for himself. the devils could've used stralman in the beginning of the season, but there's no way stralman could do what zidlicky is doing now.
Edited by Triumph, 10 May 2012 - 01:20 PM.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#59
Posted 10 May 2012 - 01:32 PM
of course not, even though you're clearly a new poster and we're just getting to know each other.
lmao...be gentle
#60
Posted 10 May 2012 - 01:34 PM
of course not, even though you're clearly a new poster and we're just getting to know each other.
stralman has been a back pairing defenseman given protected ice time and he's gotten some shots through. he's getting 17 minutes of ice time a game in the playoffs even though the rangers have played several overtime games. he is not a 'pivotal' player.
zidlicky has led the devils in ice time, quarterbacked the power play, hasn't been protected at all, and has done real well for himself.
i dont need to know you very well your arrogant attack and attitude on me the other evening filled me in quite nicely.
i never said he was a pivotal player and never compared him to zidlicky. i said stralman would have made a nice back pairing 7th defenseman for the devils and adding zidlicky to the mix would have been enough NHL caliber depth. stralman has fit in nicely as a ranger this postseason anyone who covers or watches the rangers sees that but you. he doesnt need to be pivotal on a d corps that has 3 horses on it. 3 horses that tortorella rides to death as he does with top players.
Edited by hockey3893498, 10 May 2012 - 01:39 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













