Does the league owe the Devils an apology?
#1
Posted 05 June 2012 - 08:32 AM
In this instance, we lost 4-0, but it's still no excuse for them to just outright hand LA goal #1 and get the ball rolling for them.
The puck was under Brodeurs pad...since when are players allowed to swat away at the goalies pad, push him, and jar the puck loose. And if the ref didn't see the puck, isn't it his responsibility to blow the whistle?
If the puck is under a goalies pad...you cannot just jam away at it until it comes loose. No way that goal should've counted
#3
Posted 05 June 2012 - 08:34 AM
#4
Posted 05 June 2012 - 08:35 AM
We will not get an apology and that's fine. We also had a ton of powerplays to right the ship afterwards and the Kings got better while the Devils just got worse.
#5
Posted 05 June 2012 - 08:35 AM


Proud Winner of the 2012 Sergei Brylin Award and 2011 Andy Greene Award, Official keeper of Doc and Chico's random ramblings during play in blowout games
#6
Posted 05 June 2012 - 08:36 AM
#8
Posted 05 June 2012 - 08:39 AM
We should apologize to the league for playing in a tournament above our level.
you should apologize for pretending to be a fan.


Proud Winner of the 2012 Sergei Brylin Award and 2011 Andy Greene Award, Official keeper of Doc and Chico's random ramblings during play in blowout games
#9
Posted 05 June 2012 - 08:40 AM
We should apologize to the league for playing in a tournament above our level.
If we get swept you may have a point.
Socialism is no more impractical than capitalism - either in their purest form are ridiculous, unachievable ideals. A healthy society requires healthy doses of both.
#10
Posted 05 June 2012 - 08:47 AM
Edited by slasher72, 05 June 2012 - 08:57 AM.
#11
Posted 05 June 2012 - 08:48 AM
People are starting to sound like whiny Ranger fans who think the world owes them something.

I collect spores, molds and fungus.
Hello fellow American. This you should vote me. I leave power. Good. Thank you, thank you. If you vote me, I'm hot. What? Taxes, they'll be lower... son. The Democratic vote is the right thing to do Philadelphia, so do.
How do you spot risk? How do you avoid risk? And what makes it so risky?
#12
Posted 05 June 2012 - 08:49 AM
#13
Posted 05 June 2012 - 08:51 AM
Regardless, if you cant score on a 5 on 3...
#14
Posted 05 June 2012 - 08:51 AM
Seriously, give this sh*t a rest. Devils lost the game 4-0. Couldn't score on a one minute 5 on 3. Put very few quality shots on Quick. In short, Devils were absolutely dominated and deserved to lose the game. No apology needed for the same reason that you won't get an apology for a bad call in a 10-0 game.
People are starting to sound like whiny Ranger fans who think the world owes them something.
The Devils were not absolutely dominated. I love this talk whenever a team is shut out that they must've played really poorly.
That said, who cares about an apology, it doesn't change anything.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#15
Posted 05 June 2012 - 08:55 AM
The New Jersey Devils win Stanley Cups everywhere:
-NHL record for most road wins in the playoffs - 10-1 in '95 and 10-2 in '00
-NHL record for most home wins in the playoffs - 12-1 in '03
#16
Posted 05 June 2012 - 08:56 AM
Sure the refs made the wrong call... but if going down 1-0 in the second period is enough to make the team fold like a cheap suit, they don't deserve it.
#17
Posted 05 June 2012 - 09:00 AM
The Devils were not absolutely dominated. I love this talk whenever a team is shut out that they must've played really poorly.
That said, who cares about an apology, it doesn't change anything.
Not just shut out. Lost 4-0. Generated ZERO opportunities on 6 powerplays, including a 5-3. Gave up two powerplay goals where the Kings made it look easy. Most quality scoring opportunities ending up in Quick's chest protector.
That IS getting dominated. Period. End of story. There is no argument to made otherwise.

I collect spores, molds and fungus.
Hello fellow American. This you should vote me. I leave power. Good. Thank you, thank you. If you vote me, I'm hot. What? Taxes, they'll be lower... son. The Democratic vote is the right thing to do Philadelphia, so do.
How do you spot risk? How do you avoid risk? And what makes it so risky?
#18
Posted 05 June 2012 - 09:11 AM
Not just shut out. Lost 4-0. Generated ZERO opportunities on 6 powerplays, including a 5-3. Gave up two powerplay goals where the Kings made it look easy. Most quality scoring opportunities ending up in Quick's chest protector.
That IS getting dominated. Period. End of story. There is no argument to made otherwise.
They generated some opportunities on those power plays. There is lots of argument to be made otherwise - chances were 16-11 when LA made it 4-0. That's getting beaten, but not dominated.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#19
Posted 05 June 2012 - 09:14 AM
Seriously, give this sh*t a rest. Devils lost the game 4-0. Couldn't score on a one minute 5 on 3. Put very few quality shots on Quick. In short, Devils were absolutely dominated and deserved to lose the game. No apology needed for the same reason that you won't get an apology for a bad call in a 10-0 game.
People are starting to sound like whiny Ranger fans who think the world owes them something.
Absolutely dominated? I think you're exaggerating a little bit here.
We played well up until that first goal. We then proceeded to fart around a bit on a few PPs after that. We tried to open up before the end of the 2nd and got exposed on a rush the other way.
The third was a matter of life or death for us, and we were playing out of character. Case in point- Kovy trying to loft a backhand pass in the middle of the ice on the PP in his own defensive zone. That was crap Kovy used to do last year when "he didn't care"...
The first goal crippled our mental fortitude. After 2 devastating losses at home in OT, and now an apparent non-goal given to LA to give them a lead after they had been dominated up until that point...it was hockey suicide for the Devils after that.
#20
Posted 05 June 2012 - 09:20 AM
Absolutely dominated? I think you're exaggerating a little bit here.
We played well up until that first goal. We then proceeded to fart around a bit on a few PPs after that. We tried to open up before the end of the 2nd and got exposed on a rush the other way.
The third was a matter of life or death for us, and we were playing out of character. Case in point- Kovy trying to loft a backhand pass in the middle of the ice on the PP in his own defensive zone. That was crap Kovy used to do last year when "he didn't care"...
The first goal crippled our mental fortitude. After 2 devastating losses at home in OT, and now an apparent non-goal given to LA to give them a lead after they had been dominated up until that point...it was hockey suicide for the Devils after that.
Even in most blow-outs the losing team will generate a few chances and control the play for certain stretches.
Had it been the other way around, we'd be patting ourselves on the back for how awesome the team played.
There's no silver lining here. No unlucky or flukey plays that cost the Devils the game. Again, a loss where the Devils were dominated. And yes, being dominated also means not converting when you do get chances.

I collect spores, molds and fungus.
Hello fellow American. This you should vote me. I leave power. Good. Thank you, thank you. If you vote me, I'm hot. What? Taxes, they'll be lower... son. The Democratic vote is the right thing to do Philadelphia, so do.
How do you spot risk? How do you avoid risk? And what makes it so risky?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users















