Screw the refs
#1
Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:19 AM
#2
Posted 12 June 2012 - 03:27 AM
#3
Posted 12 June 2012 - 06:00 AM
The officiating in the NHL is an absolute joke.
#4
Posted 12 June 2012 - 07:10 AM

2012 Eastern Conference Champions
#5
Posted 12 June 2012 - 07:19 AM
1st, 2nd, 3rd goal off the botched call.
4th goal linesman interference
5th goal empty net
6th goal legit
Very frustrating but being down 3-0 in the series is the reason why we lost the series.
Edited by Zubie#8, 12 June 2012 - 08:19 AM.
“I think winning against them in the big stage, not just for me, but for the fans of New Jersey, people that are supporting us and always take a second seat to these guys for whatever reason, now they’ve got to be pretty happy going to work and going to school and doing all their things that they do." - Martin Brodeur
#6
Posted 12 June 2012 - 07:28 AM
Somebody's gotta be the hero... Why not me?
#7
Posted 12 June 2012 - 07:34 AM
#8
Posted 12 June 2012 - 08:14 AM
#9
Posted 12 June 2012 - 08:19 AM
The Kings beat us, not the refs.

| 2012 Season | NJDevs FHL Champion | 2013 Season |
#10
Posted 12 June 2012 - 08:30 AM
Them's the breaks sometimes. Don't give up three f'n goals. Or score a goal when we have a one minute 5 on 3 pp in game three, and maybe we're up 3-2 in the series going into last night.
Devils lost to the better team. Get over it.

I collect spores, molds and fungus.
Hello fellow American. This you should vote me. I leave power. Good. Thank you, thank you. If you vote me, I'm hot. What? Taxes, they'll be lower... son. The Democratic vote is the right thing to do Philadelphia, so do.
How do you spot risk? How do you avoid risk? And what makes it so risky?
#11
Posted 12 June 2012 - 08:57 AM
And don't get me started on the linesman skating right into Volchenkov's path on the 4th goal. They are supposed to stay along the boards in those situations so as to not interfere with the play, and he did the opposite. These are supposed to be the best refs the NHL has, and they were as terrible as our PK last night.
The Kings took advantage and deserved to win this game and the series. But if you think the refs didn't play a huge part in last night's outcome, then you are fooling yourself.
#12
Posted 12 June 2012 - 09:01 AM
its not the call that really pissed me off its the plays around it.. should have been evened up for at least the first two minutes of that 5min pp
#13
Posted 12 June 2012 - 09:04 AM
This is the worst kind of belly-aching.
Yep.
#14
Posted 12 June 2012 - 09:10 AM
#15
Posted 12 June 2012 - 09:11 AM
It's easy to say get over it. Was our PK on the 5 minute major horrible...absolutely. However, referees can completely affect the outcome of the game and there is no doubt they did so in Game 6. The missed call on the Stoll hit from behind on Gionta directly led to the Bernier 5 minute boarding major. The call on Bernier was correct and he deserved what he got. However, it wouldn't have happened if the refs did their job and made the correct call 10 seconds before.
And don't get me started on the linesman skating right into Volchenkov's path on the 4th goal. They are supposed to stay along the boards in those situations so as to not interfere with the play, and he did the opposite. These are supposed to be the best refs the NHL has, and they were as terrible as our PK last night.
The Kings took advantage and deserved to win this game and the series. But if you think the refs didn't play a huge part in last night's outcome, then you are fooling yourself.
Only an Ed Hochuli type call in that Broncos/Chargers game effects the outcome in a meaningful way. The luck of the calls breaks both ways over the course of a best of seven series. It's an unfortunate situation for Bernier, and it wasn't intentional (those type of hits rarely are), but it was certainly within the range of the ref's reasonable discretion to call the major. Some refs will give you the benefit of the doubt, but you can't count on that. Virtually every high-stick is unintentional and rarely the result of reckless play. But sometimes you draw blood and sometimes you don't. And sometimes the ref misses the call.
If you mean that refs effect the outcome in a butterfly effect kind of way, you're merely stating a truism. That Volchenkov pick, when you control the play like the Kings did, you'll tend to get those kind of breaks. If the Devils aren't in that position, stuff like that doesn't happen.
The better team won last night, and won the series. The refs had nothing to do with it.
Edited by Daniel, 12 June 2012 - 09:13 AM.

I collect spores, molds and fungus.
Hello fellow American. This you should vote me. I leave power. Good. Thank you, thank you. If you vote me, I'm hot. What? Taxes, they'll be lower... son. The Democratic vote is the right thing to do Philadelphia, so do.
How do you spot risk? How do you avoid risk? And what makes it so risky?
#16
Posted 12 June 2012 - 09:19 AM
The refs had nothing to do with it.
You're missing the point of what I'm saying. If your going to call Bernier for a boarding penalty (which I've already said was the right call to make), then you have to call Stoll for boarding/check from behind on Gionta a few second before. Just because Scuderi got smashed into the glass and Gionta got run into a 1/2 wall doesn't make a difference. The hit on Gionta was a clear penalty directly in front of the ref, and he doesn't make the call. His non-call is what potentially effected the outcome of the game as the Bernier hit wouldn't have occurred if he made that call. That PP decided the game and, therefore, the refs had an affect on the outcome.
It's not the call that was made that is the problem. It's the inconsistency and the non-call a few seconds before that changed the game.
Edited by Chuck the Duck, 12 June 2012 - 09:19 AM.
#17
Posted 12 June 2012 - 09:23 AM
I have no problem losing to a better tem.. but not like this !!
#18
Posted 12 June 2012 - 09:27 AM
You're missing the point of what I'm saying. If your going to call Bernier for a boarding penalty (which I've already said was the right call to make), then you have to call Stoll for boarding/check from behind on Gionta a few second before. Just because Scuderi got smashed into the glass and Gionta got run into a 1/2 wall doesn't make a difference. The hit on Gionta was a clear penalty directly in front of the ref, and he doesn't make the call. His non-call is what potentially effected the outcome of the game as the Bernier hit wouldn't have occurred if he made that call. That PP decided the game and, therefore, the refs had an affect on the outcome.
It's not the call that was made that is the problem. It's the inconsistency and the non-call a few seconds before that changed the game.
Missed calls are part of the game. At other times, the refs missed calls that favored the Kings. Yes, you're right that without the Gionta non-call the Bernier hit doesn't happen. That's a truism. Yet, the fact remains, the Bernier hit happened, and he could have been more careful or held up on what was an unnecessary hit in the first place. A blown off-sides call or missed hand pass three minutes earlier changes things down the road.
Edited by Daniel, 12 June 2012 - 09:28 AM.

I collect spores, molds and fungus.
Hello fellow American. This you should vote me. I leave power. Good. Thank you, thank you. If you vote me, I'm hot. What? Taxes, they'll be lower... son. The Democratic vote is the right thing to do Philadelphia, so do.
How do you spot risk? How do you avoid risk? And what makes it so risky?
#19
Posted 12 June 2012 - 10:51 AM

"This Is Team" "We Have Unfinished Business" - Ilya Kovalchuk
#20
Posted 12 June 2012 - 10:57 AM
Im not saying the refs were the reason we lost last night (cause we didn't play well at all, and need to be able to kill off penalties). But the refs last night did not call the game both ways.
If the first sentence is true, the second sentence is, at best, an observation of little value.

I collect spores, molds and fungus.
Hello fellow American. This you should vote me. I leave power. Good. Thank you, thank you. If you vote me, I'm hot. What? Taxes, they'll be lower... son. The Democratic vote is the right thing to do Philadelphia, so do.
How do you spot risk? How do you avoid risk? And what makes it so risky?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













