Zach Parise has agreed to terms with the Minnesota Wild
#1681
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:35 AM
2008, 2010, 2011 Pat Burns winner for 'Most emotional poster'
2011 UDX Signature award winner
#1682
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:36 AM
It's easier to talk about the difference between 7m and 10m when the money is theoretical and your name isn't on the contract. 3 million dollars is still 3 million dollars.
THIS.
#1683
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:37 AM
RIGHT.
Like I said, the dude has the right to ask for whatever he wants but it's still a character decision and so would be choosing a team like the Pens.
I suppose you really need that extra Corvette sometimes.
Exactly, I mean how much money is enough?
#1684
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:37 AM
Just giving you grief, I went to a different prep school in state.
That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence- Christopher Hitchens
ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
#1685
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:39 AM
I agree 100%. Too many fans are trying to defend this "decision making" process because of the money being offered.
Here is some reality:
If you make "only" 7 million a year instead of 10 million a year you can still have the following:
1. Kids in the best schools.
2. A nice house in a nice neighborhood.
3. Another house (or two) anywhere else in the world.
4. Your wife will never have to work a day in her life.
I'm not a socialist and I don't care who makes how much money but I don't really care about people who gripe over making "only" seven million a year instead of X million a year.
If you want to play here and you will make seven million then stay; if you really need an extra million to play a game then take a walk.
All of that's right, but the difficult part of the decision is WHERE he's going to have all of those things you listed, not whether or not he gets to have them. Regardless of all the perks, you're still going to be living somewhere and, all else being equal, you may as well like that place and all the things it has to offer. Nobody's saying he's chosing between a rock and a hard place. He's an extremely fortunate man regardless of whatever he chooses, but choosing between a few really great things doesn't make it an easy decision and it's one that will have a large impact on the rest of his life.
#1686
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:43 AM
cmon marty
#3 #4 #27 #30 #26 #17
#1687
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:45 AM
It's easier to talk about the difference between 7m and 10m when the money is theoretical and your name isn't on the contract. 3 million dollars is still 3 million dollars.
That's up to you.
Like I said its his/your decision.
All of that's right, but the difficult part of the decision is WHERE he's going to have all of those things you listed, not whether or not he gets to have them. Regardless of all the perks, you're still going to be living somewhere and, all else being equal, you may as well like that place and all the things it has to offer. Nobody's saying he's chosing between a rock and a hard place. He's an extremely fortunate man regardless of whatever he chooses, but choosing between a few really great things doesn't make it an easy decision and it's one that will have a large impact on the rest of his life.
Okay, so he can take a walk.
#1688
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:45 AM
Edited by capo, 03 July 2012 - 11:45 AM.
#1689
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:46 AM
THIS.
I've been reading your posts on this topic and its clear that you are a guy who would make money the number aspect of a contract offer.
That's your right of course.
#1690
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:46 AM
I don't think it's a money decisions for Zach. It's definitely a hockey decision so none of this other stuff has much bearing. When your talking about millions of dollars in salary he's already going to have the best of everything. He's not eating and sending his kids to the same places you do either way....
If Minnesota is still involved in the talks it sure as hell isn't a hockey decision.
#1691
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:46 AM
My best guess is that the Devils cannot offer him the huge signing bonus that other teams are able to (the lockout insurance). Similar terms and length, just no huge signing bonus.

-This is Team-
Anyone who says, ‘You played in that New York area,’ I say, ‘No, I played in New Jersey.’ - Ken Daneyko
#1692
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:47 AM
I don't think it's a money decisions for Zach. It's definitely a hockey decision so none of this other stuff has much bearing. When your talking about millions of dollars in salary he's already going to have the best of everything. He's not eating and sending his kids to the same places you do either way....
Well if its a hockey decision then the Devils should be on the top of the list.
Look at the recent 20 years for the team and its clear that it is a winner.
#1693
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:48 AM
I've been reading your posts on this topic and its clear that you are a guy who would make money the number aspect of a contract offer.
That's your right of course.
I would be more along the lines of leaning toward the money. If you asked me this question during my playing days I would absolutely, unequivocally tell you I would wear no other jersey than that of my high school, but now that I am 5 years out of college and I see just how brutal the business world is...
TAKE THE MONEY AND RUN...FAST
#1694
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:50 AM
If Minnesota is still involved in the talks it sure as hell isn't a hockey decision.
Yep. And even a team like Chicago isn't consistent historically.
If you want the best chance at winning long term then NJ would be a great place to play. And if you are already the captain of NJ I don't see why it would be so hard to come back.
It all comes down to money.
I would be more along the lines of leaning toward the money. If you asked me this question during my playing days I would absolutely, unequivocally tell you I would wear no other jersey than that of my high school, but now that I am 5 years out of college and I see just how brutal the business world is...
TAKE THE MONEY AND RUN...FAST
I understand but I see it the other way. I don't care about people who are griping about "losing out" because they get paid 7 million a year and not 10 million a year. Considering that the people who come watch the games, by and large, are scrapping to get by and grab a beer at the game.
GAME...
#1695
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:52 AM
Well if its a hockey decision then the Devils should be on the top of the list.
Look at the recent 20 years for the team and its clear that it is a winner.
And two of the guys who were a big part of that (Brodeur and Lamoriello) are almost done. And the ownership issue is iffy. Zach is likely looking at where the Devils are going, not where they've been. And let's face it, the future is filled with question marks.
[Mark Messier]: A big, bald attention whore with a stupid Easter Island-lookin face. - from who else? DaneykoIsGod!
Even when Marty comes back maybe Larry should put Clemmensen to be on the goal during the shootouts.
Can the coach do that ? Switch the goalies 5 seconds to go in overtime? - Most priceless quote ever posted on a message board.
Martin Brodeur: THE MOST ALL-TIME WINS!, 12 straight seasons of 30+ wins, 3 Stanley Cups, 4 Vezina Trophies, and zero respect from too many so-called Devils "fans" who are either too young or too bandwagon to remember the much darker days of Sean Burke, Craig Billington, Bob Sauve, Alain Chevrier, and the talented but overwhelmed Chico Resch, among many others.
It's easy to support a great player when he's playing at his very best. It takes a true fan to support that same player during those rare moments and stretches when he's not. Babe Ruth went 0-4 some games, and sometimes Wayne Gretzky was held pointless. There may be such a thing as greatness, but no such thing as absolute perfection every single night.
#30 FOREVER!
20 out of 1,946 njdevs.com members agree: CR1976 is the Most Knowledgable Poster of 2008! Victory is mine...oh yes, victory is mine!
#1696
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:53 AM
Well if its a hockey decision then the Devils should be on the top of the list.
Look at the recent 20 years for the team and its clear that it is a winner.
Not necessarily, he may feel that some of the other teams have a better chance at winning. Or giving him the opportunity to play the game the way he wants to play it.
FWIW- If it was up to me I'd be in Minnesota already because family and home is what I value above all else.
#1697
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:55 AM
And two of the guys who were a big part of that (Brodeur and Lamoriello) are almost done. And the ownership issue is iffy. Zach is likely looking at where the Devils are going, not where they've been. And let's face it, the future is filled with question marks.
And in what magical place is this not the case?
#1698
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:55 AM
And two of the guys who were a big part of that (Brodeur and Lamoriello) are almost done. And the ownership issue is iffy. Zach is likely looking at where the Devils are going, not where they've been. And let's face it, the future is filled with question marks.
Aren't a lot of teams at least in the bidding for Parise like that though?
Pittsburgh is still iffy with Crosby and to me Malkin is not the type of player to lead a team to the cup. Detroit seems to be slowly sinking as well.
#1699
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:57 AM
Co-
of Ilya Kovalchuk
Proud to be King of the Kovalnuts (Est. June 2010 by MantaRay)
#1700
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:57 AM
Well if its a hockey decision then the Devils should be on the top of the list.
Look at the recent 20 years for the team and its clear that it is a winner.
Not neccesarily, that's part of the problem. Pittsburgh is his best chance to win, Minnesota offers family and friends (we do too, but it's still different).
The New Jersey Devils win Stanley Cups everywhere:
-NHL record for most road wins in the playoffs - 10-1 in '95 and 10-2 in '00
-NHL record for most home wins in the playoffs - 12-1 in '03
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











