Martin Brodeur - 2 years $9 million
#421
Posted 02 July 2012 - 08:48 AM

#422
Posted 02 July 2012 - 08:53 AM
That second year is likely going to be spent mentoring and splitting time with Wedgewood and/or Kinkaid to take over for him the following season. This was my predicition of what would happen prior to the season, but I always assumed he would work off of 1 year deals.
Edited by Chuck the Duck, 02 July 2012 - 08:55 AM.
#423
Posted 02 July 2012 - 08:58 AM
That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence- Christopher Hitchens
ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
#424
Posted 02 July 2012 - 08:59 AM
#425
Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:03 AM
#426
Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:04 AM

"I don't like those Rangers fans from New Jersey." - Jim Dowd
#427
Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:05 AM
#428
Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:07 AM
Was just thinking about that. If Marty decides that he's had enough after this season, that 35+ rule comes into play. If we're up against the cap and need more players, then it's bad. If we're struggling to stay afloat financially, then I guess having a cap hit that helps us reach the floor while not having to pay the player works to the team's advantage.It also means that he can't retire after this season because it would completely screw this team in 2013-14 as his cap hit would remain based upon the over 35 signing rule.
Section 226 Row 2 Seats 15-16
#429
Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:09 AM
Chuck: The Devils aren't a cap team, Brodeur retiring has no effect on what the Devils would do financially or otherwise. I hope they front-loaded this contract so he does retire after this season.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#430
Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:10 AM
One is a low life bottom feeder that lives on the feces of others. The other is a fish"
Official Keeper of THE BUD LIGHT GOAL BAR
#431
Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:17 AM
#432
Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:19 AM
Come on now LD, you should be delighted he is back.
Marty bashing is 99% of your subject matter on here, if he left then what would you post about
I think you need to check my posts if you think 99% of my post are about Marty this past year. If he retired I would have been OK with that. I didn't want him to go to another team for a year. And as I have said I didn't want a 2 year deal with him and IMO $4.5M is more than he is worth I would have liked $2.5-3 M and one year. He is 40 and injuries are happening. He didn't have a great year last season. In the playoffs he allowed a stoppable goal most every game but he kept us alive when our offence was sparse. He had Lou by the balls, Lou didn't have a starting goalie ready to go, shame on him.
#433
Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:23 AM
I think you need to check my posts if you think 99% of my post are about Marty this past year. If he retired I would have been OK with that. I didn't want him to go to another team for a year. And as I have said I didn't want a 2 year deal with him and IMO $4.5M is more than he is worth I would have liked $2.5-3 M and one year. He is 40 and injuries are happening. He didn't have a great year last season. In the playoffs he allowed a stoppable goal most every game but he kept us alive when our offence was sparse. He had Lou by the balls, Lou didn't have a starting goalie ready to go, shame on him.
My apologies 98%.
OFFICIAL KEEPER OF:Dainius Zubrus......Andy Greene.......Vladimir Zharkov and Alexander Vasyunov

Winner of the 07/08 ,08/09 & 10/11 Slava Fetisov Award For Best International Poster
#434
Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:23 AM
How does Lou sign a 40 year old goalie to a 2 year contract, but he doesn't give up the 1st round pick in the Kovalchuk circumvention this year? This could really, really hurt years down the road.
Chuck: The Devils aren't a cap team, Brodeur retiring has no effect on what the Devils would do financially or otherwise. I hope they front-loaded this contract so he does retire after this season.
and then not match poni....lou is losing it
#435
Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:26 AM
I think you need to check my posts if you think 99% of my post are about Marty this past year. If he retired I would have been OK with that. I didn't want him to go to another team for a year. And as I have said I didn't want a 2 year deal with him and IMO $4.5M is more than he is worth I would have liked $2.5-3 M and one year. He is 40 and injuries are happening. He didn't have a great year last season. In the playoffs he allowed a stoppable goal most every game but he kept us alive when our offence was sparse. He had Lou by the balls, Lou didn't have a starting goalie ready to go, shame on him.
My apologies 98%.
I do have to say that I have noticed LD hasn't posted as much about Marty this year as in years past.
#436
Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:36 AM
I do have to say that I have noticed LD hasn't posted as much about Marty this year as in years past.
We are clearly keeping things serious around here today.
In that case:
I think you need to check my posts if you think 99% of my post are about Marty this past year. If he retired I would have been OK with that. I didn't want him to go to another team for a year. And as I have said I didn't want a 2 year deal with him and IMO $4.5M is more than he is worth I would have liked $2.5-3 M and one year. He is 40 and injuries are happening. He didn't have a great year last season. In the playoffs he allowed a stoppable goal most every game but he kept us alive when our offence was sparse. He had Lou by the balls, Lou didn't have a starting goalie ready to go, shame on him.
Of course you would like that deal. Everyone on the board would like that deal over the one he got. But players don’t sign for their market value. Once players go UFA you always have to overpay.
Also who would you suggest as the ready to go replacement. Off the 2012 UFA list Marty is clearly the best Goaltender. So are you suggesting we trade assets and future depth in a trade? Because that long term looks like a worse option to me.
OFFICIAL KEEPER OF:Dainius Zubrus......Andy Greene.......Vladimir Zharkov and Alexander Vasyunov

Winner of the 07/08 ,08/09 & 10/11 Slava Fetisov Award For Best International Poster
#437
Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:37 AM
How does Lou sign a 40 year old goalie to a 2 year contract, but he doesn't give up the 1st round pick in the Kovalchuk circumvention this year? This could really, really hurt years down the road.
What does one have to do with the other?
The other silver lining to this is that we can close the door on the possibility of trading for Luongo.

I collect spores, molds and fungus.
Hello fellow American. This you should vote me. I leave power. Good. Thank you, thank you. If you vote me, I'm hot. What? Taxes, they'll be lower... son. The Democratic vote is the right thing to do Philadelphia, so do.
How do you spot risk? How do you avoid risk? And what makes it so risky?
#438
Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:38 AM
a) retires after year 1
or
b) accepts a backup/mentor role year 2
#439
Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:39 AM
#440
Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:40 AM
What does one have to do with the other?
The other silver lining to this is that we can close the door on the possibility of trading for Luongo.
http://www.hockey-re...der_by=save_pct
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











