And he wants to hit the open market.The Pens did not have so much trouble with Sid did they? The Devils are probably low-balling him and will wait to see what other teams offer. At that point I hope it isn't too late. Bottom line, the Devils should have put their best offer out there and let Zach decide what to do...
Martin Brodeur - 2 years $9 million
#61
Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:41 AM
“I think winning against them in the big stage, not just for me, but for the fans of New Jersey, people that are supporting us and always take a second seat to these guys for whatever reason, now they’ve got to be pretty happy going to work and going to school and doing all their things that they do." - Martin Brodeur
#62
Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:42 AM
marty wants to be here. he also wants to be on a contender.
dont you think he would take a paycut to lock up parise long term???
he wants to win is all
His hiring of an agent makes it seem as though he is not looking for a paycut....
2011= KOVALCUP
#63
Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:42 AM
As for Brodeur, I really do not get the mentality that he deserves $5M+ because of what he has done for us 8, 10 or even 15 years ago. I would prefer for Marty to stick around for another year but at what he is worth now and not at the expense of signing others. Right now even $3M is a stretch but I guess I will take it. Would like somewhere around $2M.
#64
Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:42 AM
$3M is a pipedream. No way Marty signs for that. Guess what fellas? I think Marty hired an agent partially because he wants a 2 year deal....
A few teams would probably pay him $10M for 2 years...it would create a serious buzz for whatever franchise signed him, and the marketing department would have a field day. Merchandise sale$$$
I think everyone here just looks at pure numbers too much and does not look at the overall picture. The NHL is a business to make PROFIT. CASH MONEY. Even if Marty is only a shell of his former self, he will still generate a sh!t load of cash for whatever team he plays for...
Hopefully it is the DEVILS.
I'm pretty sure merchandise sales are pooled in the NHL, so no one cares about signing a player to sell more jerseys.
There is no team out there that can offer Brodeur $10M for 2 years. And I'm sorry, but people don't come out to NHL games to see a goalie. Whatever interest Brodeur would spur would be minimal.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#65
Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:43 AM
TravisHeHateMe
Someone confirm, because just read it on third-party site: Brodeur's asking for $6M range? If that's true, this is going to be good.
Edited by SterioDesign, 29 June 2012 - 10:43 AM.
www.SterioDesign.com
Who is it gonna be?

#66
Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:43 AM
Edited by Jas0nMacIsaac, 29 June 2012 - 10:45 AM.
#67
Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:43 AM
For the 4 millionth time, it's idiotic to compare our situation to the Penguins'; they're not in financial hell.The Pens did not have so much trouble with Sid did they? The Devils are probably low-balling him and will wait to see what other teams offer. At that point I hope it isn't too late. Bottom line, the Devils should have put their best offer out there and let Zach decide what to do...
And, 'bottom line', what makes you think the Devils aren't putting their best offer out there? That's just dumb.
Quote sources, bro.Apparently that Brodeur is asking for 6m...................
2008, 2010, 2011 Pat Burns winner for 'Most emotional poster'
2011 UDX Signature award winner
#68
Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:45 AM
And he wants to hit the open market.
If that is the case so be it....he would probably only sign before July 1 now if the Devils offered something absurd. So now we sit and wait....
I'm pretty sure merchandise sales are pooled in the NHL, so no one cares about signing a player to sell more jerseys.
There is no team out there that can offer Brodeur $10M for 2 years. And I'm sorry, but people don't come out to NHL games to see a goalie. Whatever interest Brodeur would spur would be minimal.
I would be interested to see if they are pooled. You don't think someone would sign Marty as a marketing move/hope for the best on the ice? You don't think he would help sell tickets ? (assuming the team doesn't sell out every game any way)
2011= KOVALCUP
#69
Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:45 AM
Quote sources, bro.
yup sorry its there now
www.SterioDesign.com
Who is it gonna be?

#70
Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:45 AM
That's not a source, Sterio. That's a guy on Twitter wondering about something he read somewhere else, which he himself is not confirming.
Edited by Triumph, 29 June 2012 - 10:46 AM.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#71
Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:46 AM
What? That's a really odd opinion, I'd like to see where you came up with that one. If Brodeur went to a new team you don't think that organization isn't going to see increased revenue? It's the best goaltender of all time, we're talking about, who just showed that he can still play like his previous ~six HUNDRED victories.people don't come out to NHL games to see a goalie. Whatever interest Brodeur would spur would be minimal.
2008, 2010, 2011 Pat Burns winner for 'Most emotional poster'
2011 UDX Signature award winner
#72
Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:46 AM
“I think winning against them in the big stage, not just for me, but for the fans of New Jersey, people that are supporting us and always take a second seat to these guys for whatever reason, now they’ve got to be pretty happy going to work and going to school and doing all their things that they do." - Martin Brodeur
#73
Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:47 AM
Edited by Devils731, 29 June 2012 - 10:47 AM.
-Terry Goodkind
Sex Panther cologne -- 50 percent of the time, it works every time.
-Anchorman
The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The second best time is now.
-Anonymous
Keeper of Section 212-213's wayward step
#74
Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:47 AM
Maybe they're not pooled. Whatever. Still don't think signing a below-average player for jersey sales is a smart move for anyone - he's still got to provide value on the ice. They're not signing He Hate Me.
That's not a source, Sterio.
I did not mean just jerseys. There is alot to merchandise, and a new shot in the arm to a franchise could carry over to other things. Increased season ticket sales, etc etc. Look what our Cup run did for the Devils this year? Granted signing the greatest goaltender of all time is not necessarily the same thing, but I am pretty sure he would energize any fan base he went to....
2011= KOVALCUP
#75
Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:47 AM
the most likely scenario is this:
Marty went to Lou and said he's not taking a paycut from $5.2.
Lou feels that $4MM or so is appropriate for a 40 year old goaltender who needed a strong second half to be an average NHL goaltender with a legacy.
Both Marty and Lou know that he wants to stay and both want that to happen.
I agree with this, not necessarily the next part that Lou told Marty to hire an agent, but that Marty simply isn't happy with the pay cut Lou is offering, or possibly that it's only a 1 year deal. Marty I guess is betting that another team will have a competitive offer he can use as leverage. I can't see another team doing that unless they have attendance problems and think a name like Brodeur will help.
I think Brodeur will re-sign very quickly once July 1 rolls around or maybe even beforehand if this is all posturing. It will be "an overpayment." If there's one thing we know about Lou, he rewards loyalty. There's no way the Devils aren't the best destination for Brodeur both in terms of money and role.
Sharks Fan: 2012-?
#76
Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:48 AM
What? That's a really odd opinion, I'd like to see where you came up with that one. If Brodeur went to a new team you don't think that organization isn't going to see increased revenue? It's the best goaltender of all time, we're talking about, who just showed that he can still play like his previous ~six HUNDRED victories.
I think Marty landing in another NHL city would bring them a nice increase in revenue. Especially a hockey town, who appreciates living legends.
2011= KOVALCUP
#77
Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:49 AM
I think I have more credibility than that source. C'mon man.yup sorry its there now
2008, 2010, 2011 Pat Burns winner for 'Most emotional poster'
2011 UDX Signature award winner
#78
Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:50 AM
What? That's a really odd opinion, I'd like to see where you came up with that one. If Brodeur went to a new team you don't think that organization isn't going to see increased revenue? It's the best goaltender of all time, we're talking about, who just showed that he can still play like his previous ~six HUNDRED victories.
No, I don't think they will. And all that good will would curdle real quick if Brodeur came out playing like he did the last two years.
A hockey town? Hockey towns have almost maxed out their revenue that a single player can bring (they haven't maxed out TV revenues etc.). Gimme a break.
Edited by Triumph, 29 June 2012 - 10:51 AM.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#79
Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:50 AM
And I'm sorry, but people don't come out to NHL games to see a goalie. Whatever interest Brodeur would spur would be minimal.
Maybe I'm in the minority here but when I was younger and only went to games here and there I would ask my parents to get tickets against certain teams because I liked certain goalies.
#80
Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:51 AM
I think I have more credibility than that source. C'mon man.
well i said "Take it for what its worth", not saying i believe it but it was out there so
www.SterioDesign.com
Who is it gonna be?

0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











