Derek Roy traded to Dallas
#1
Posted 02 July 2012 - 04:53 PM
www.SterioDesign.com
Who is it gonna be?

#2
Posted 02 July 2012 - 04:57 PM
www.SterioDesign.com
Who is it gonna be?

#3
Posted 02 July 2012 - 05:19 PM
nice... just when we got rid of Avery in our conference... here comes Ott
At least its not in our division, and Ott isnt nearly as annoying as Avery.
#4
Posted 02 July 2012 - 05:41 PM
of Zach Parise's McFarlane Figure!NEW JERSEY In keeping with the fact they are the Devils, New Jersey actually went with a villain by the name of Lex Lou-Lamoriello, an evil genius who finds ways to get around the salary cap until he is stopped in his tracks by Bett-man.
#5
Posted 02 July 2012 - 06:52 PM
Edited by halfsharkalligatorhalfman, 02 July 2012 - 07:34 PM.
Sharks Fan: 2012-?
#6
Posted 02 July 2012 - 07:00 PM
Sabres fans all love this trade. I'm surprised, seems like Roy had more value to me. Apparently they all think he's a locker room cancer that parties to hard.
That and they wanted/needed a guy like Ott in the worst way after the Ryan Miller-Milan Lucic fiasco last year.
The New Jersey Devils win Stanley Cups everywhere:
-NHL record for most road wins in the playoffs - 10-1 in '95 and 10-2 in '00
-NHL record for most home wins in the playoffs - 12-1 in '03
#7
Posted 02 July 2012 - 07:26 PM
That and they wanted/needed a guy like Ott in the worst way after the Ryan Miller-Milan Lucic fiasco last year.
I guess so Ott can run the opposing goalie? 'Cause he's sure as hell not going to fight Lucic.
Like this move for the Stars - Ott is a solid grinding center, but they can get by with Fiddler, Roy adds some offense.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#8
Posted 03 July 2012 - 08:48 AM
#9
Posted 05 July 2012 - 08:24 AM
Sabres fans all love this trade. I'm surprised, seems like Roy had more value to me. Apparently they all think he's a locker room cancer that parties too hard.
Yup.
The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs;
it's Don't Tread On Me.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













