Devils re-sign Bryce Salvador
#81
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:49 AM
Co-
of Ilya Kovalchuk
Proud to be King of the Kovalnuts (Est. June 2010 by MantaRay)
#82
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:51 AM
in the past 2 days we have signed 3 36+ players to a combined total of 7 years. The 2nd year was supposed to be the bonus for Salvador and we were supposed to probably not do it. I guess teams were offering 3 years and Lou wanted to keep him. Who wants to be that 3.16 million is completely wasted 2014-15?
If they ward off bankruptcy this year, they sure as fvck won't in 2014, so who cares, that's what you guys are not getting. They are not magically going to revert to a cap team, even if they go under and get a new owner.
#83
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:52 AM
If they ward off bankruptcy this year, they sure as fvck won't in 2014, so who cares, that's what you guys are not getting. They are not magically going to revert to a cap team, even if they go under and get a new owner.
What you are not getting is that they still have a budget and signing below-average defensemen who are 36 to contracts that an average D would sign isn't a good idea.
Bryce Salvador signed for the same amount as Johnny Oduya. Who would you rather have?
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#84
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:53 AM
I think a trade might go down too.
Anyone think Volchenkov might waive to go back to Ottawa?
Maybe Greene goes somewhere?
Maybe Tallinder back to Buffalo?
Fighter of the Nightman.
Champion of the Sun.
You're a Master of Karate, and Friendship, for Everyone.
#85
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:54 AM
Leadership is great but this guy isn't Scott Stevens.
He isn't getting paid like Stevens. Stevens was making 4 million dollars a year at Bryce's age, and that was almost 10 years ago.
"The Devils are that zombie that takes an ax to the skull, a bullet to the temple and is set on fire … and yet keeps lumbering along to the annoyance of all the other zombies." - Puck Daddy
#86
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:54 AM
Bryce Salvador signed for the same amount as Johnny Oduya. Who would you rather have?
Bryce Salvador.

"I don't like those Rangers fans from New Jersey." - Jim Dowd
#87
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:54 AM
What you are not getting is that they still have a budget and signing below-average defensemen who are 36 to contracts that an average D would sign isn't a good idea.
Bryce Salvador signed for the same amount as Johnny Oduya. Who would you rather have?
Bryce Salvador.
"The Devils are that zombie that takes an ax to the skull, a bullet to the temple and is set on fire … and yet keeps lumbering along to the annoyance of all the other zombies." - Puck Daddy
#88
Posted 03 July 2012 - 11:56 AM
What you are not getting is that they still have a budget and signing below-average defensemen who are 36 to contracts that an average D would sign isn't a good idea.
Bryce Salvador signed for the same amount as Johnny Oduya. Who would you rather have?
He signed for the same amount as Andy Greene and likely (with the surgery, *very likely*) more than Mark Fayne. Obviously the answer is the same.
What you're not getting is that dead money doesn't freaking matter if you're not going to spend to the cap. Key word is *spend* to the cap.
If he ends up being dead money, who cares. He won't be next season unless he takes one off the dome again, but it is what it is. Getting tied up in who gets paid what is pointless, they have a budget, they are aware of this and even more money comes off next year.
Edited by maxpower, 03 July 2012 - 11:56 AM.
#89
Posted 03 July 2012 - 12:01 PM
#90
Posted 03 July 2012 - 12:01 PM
I think for one year I would definitely rather have Bryce. For 2+: Oduya.Bryce Salvador signed for the same amount as Johnny Oduya. Who would you rather have?
Co-
of Ilya Kovalchuk
Proud to be King of the Kovalnuts (Est. June 2010 by MantaRay)
#91
Posted 03 July 2012 - 12:03 PM
He signed for the same amount as Andy Greene and likely (with the surgery, *very likely*) more than Mark Fayne. Obviously the answer is the same.
What you're not getting is that dead money doesn't freaking matter if you're not going to spend to the cap. Key word is *spend* to the cap.
If he ends up being dead money, who cares. He won't be next season unless he takes one off the dome again, but it is what it is. Getting tied up in who gets paid what is pointless, they have a budget, they are aware of this and even more money comes off next year.
What you're not getting is that dead money DOES matter if you don't spend to the cap, because you are still spending to *A* cap. And even more money DOESN'T come off next year, if this year is any indication of what we're in for - Zubrus will be re-signed to a 4 year deal, Elias 5, and Brodeur will be extended 3 more years just because.
Andy Greene was 28 when he signed his deal. Bryce Salvador is *36*. 36 year old defensemen not named Stevens, Bourque, or MacInnis, typically don't play all that well.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#92
Posted 03 July 2012 - 12:05 PM
If Sal retires then he isn't paid and the dead cap hit doesn't hurt a team not spending to the cap.
If the younger guys are better than him next season then he can be traded to a team wanting a veteran presence.
-Terry Goodkind
Sex Panther cologne -- 50 percent of the time, it works every time.
-Anchorman
The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The second best time is now.
-Anonymous
Keeper of Section 212-213's wayward step
#93
Posted 03 July 2012 - 12:06 PM
What you're not getting is that dead money DOES matter if you don't spend to the cap, because you are still spending to *A* cap. And even more money DOESN'T come off next year, if this year is any indication of what we're in for - Zubrus will be re-signed to a 4 year deal, Elias 5, and Brodeur will be extended 3 more years just because.
Andy Greene was 28 when he signed his deal. Bryce Salvador is *36*. 36 year old defensemen not named Stevens, Bourque, or MacInnis, typically don't play all that well.
I am talking about dead cap space. Should he get injured or retire.
#94
Posted 03 July 2012 - 12:08 PM
I'd rather have a 2 year deal but 3 isn't a big deal really.
If Sal retires then he isn't paid and the dead cap hit doesn't hurt a team not spending to the cap.
If the younger guys are better than him next season then he can be traded to a team wanting a veteran presence.
I think the fear is more that he will completely fail in the latter year(s) and we will not be able to trade him. Especially if he gets injured. We also may not look for an upgrade just because we have him signed and let him play mediocre hockey.
Co-
of Ilya Kovalchuk
Proud to be King of the Kovalnuts (Est. June 2010 by MantaRay)
#95
Posted 03 July 2012 - 12:12 PM
I am talking about dead cap space. Should he get injured or retire.
Oh yeah that I don't care about at all, assuming NJ was able to get the contract insured.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#96
Posted 03 July 2012 - 12:14 PM
OFFICIAL KEEPER OF:Dainius Zubrus......Andy Greene.......Vladimir Zharkov and Alexander Vasyunov

Winner of the 07/08 ,08/09 & 10/11 Slava Fetisov Award For Best International Poster
#97
Posted 03 July 2012 - 12:16 PM
Andy Greene was 28 when he signed his deal. Bryce Salvador is *36*. 36 year old defensemen not named Stevens, Bourque, or MacInnis, typically don't play all that well.
Weren't you saying a lot of similar things last time we inked Salvador?
He's certainly worth the money when healthy. If he isn't healthy, he's scratched and comes off the cap. If he declines, he doesn't have any clauses that would prevent Lou from shedding his contract.
This is a three-year deal that could easily end up being a zero-year deal for a defenseman who has already exceeded absolutely every Devils fans' expectations so far. How can anyone actually have a problem with this?

"I don't like those Rangers fans from New Jersey." - Jim Dowd
#98
Posted 03 July 2012 - 12:19 PM
This is a three-year deal that could easily end up being a zero-year deal for a defenseman who has already exceeded absolutely every Devils fans' expectations so far. How can anyone actually have a problem with this?
I understand people having a problem with it, I don't get people having as much problem with is as they seem to. Almost all UFA contracts are bad, this is just another bad UFA contract, seems in line with the "badness" that many other UFA deals are.
-Terry Goodkind
Sex Panther cologne -- 50 percent of the time, it works every time.
-Anchorman
The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The second best time is now.
-Anonymous
Keeper of Section 212-213's wayward step
#99
Posted 03 July 2012 - 12:25 PM
Edited by devlman, 03 July 2012 - 12:25 PM.
#100
Posted 03 July 2012 - 12:25 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













