I may be wrong but if the Devils go bankrupt I believe there is a provision to break the lease and re-write it with Vanderbeek or the NHL or the new Owner.
Such a lease provision would be unenforceable.
Posted 09 August 2012 - 07:38 PM
I may be wrong but if the Devils go bankrupt I believe there is a provision to break the lease and re-write it with Vanderbeek or the NHL or the new Owner.

Posted 10 August 2012 - 11:08 AM
Posted 11 August 2012 - 10:13 AM
Posted 13 August 2012 - 09:34 AM
“I think winning against them in the big stage, not just for me, but for the fans of New Jersey, people that are supporting us and always take a second seat to these guys for whatever reason, now they’ve got to be pretty happy going to work and going to school and doing all their things that they do." - Martin Brodeur
Posted 13 August 2012 - 09:36 AM

Posted 13 August 2012 - 09:40 AM
Why would the CBA effect this? It's not like the Devils will get a substantial amount more from revenue sharing
Edited by Triumph, 13 August 2012 - 09:44 AM.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
Posted 13 August 2012 - 09:52 AM
Chris Botta @ChrisBottaNHL
NJ Devils lenders could force team to bankruptcy tomorrow, but will likely wait until CBA is resolved. Details at @SBJSBD
Posted 13 August 2012 - 10:50 AM

Posted 13 August 2012 - 11:06 AM
Jesus, why is Vanderbeek delaying the inevitable? What does he honestly gain from all this?Per "Debtwire", which I can't link to unfortunately, the rumor is that Vanderbeek is trying to get a two-year extension on the maturity of the $80 million that's past due, in exchange for giving the lenders a "coupon bump", a term that I'm unfamiliar with, but which I assume means higher priority.
Posted 13 August 2012 - 11:13 AM
Jesus, why is Vanderbeek delaying the inevitable? What does he honestly gain from all this?
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
Posted 13 August 2012 - 11:25 AM
I know the Devils are in the top half of revenue, but isn't JVB still losing a **** ton trying to scrape together money to pay back the creditors? I feel like this is all counterproductive for himThe illusion that he is a man capable of affording to own an NHL franchise? I mean, if I were him I'd probably do the same thing - he quit his day job. What's he going to have if he's forced out as owner?
Posted 13 August 2012 - 11:25 AM
How old is Vanderbeek? Cant find anything on google.The illusion that he is a man capable of affording to own an NHL franchise? I mean, if I were him I'd probably do the same thing - he quit his day job. What's he going to have if he's forced out as owner?
“I think winning against them in the big stage, not just for me, but for the fans of New Jersey, people that are supporting us and always take a second seat to these guys for whatever reason, now they’ve got to be pretty happy going to work and going to school and doing all their things that they do." - Martin Brodeur
Posted 13 August 2012 - 12:29 PM
How old is Vanderbeek? Cant find anything on google.
Posted 13 August 2012 - 01:00 PM
Cool thanks, I was just curiousHe was 46/47 when he bought the team so he's probably around 51/52.
Edited by Zubie#8, 13 August 2012 - 01:00 PM.
“I think winning against them in the big stage, not just for me, but for the fans of New Jersey, people that are supporting us and always take a second seat to these guys for whatever reason, now they’ve got to be pretty happy going to work and going to school and doing all their things that they do." - Martin Brodeur
Posted 13 August 2012 - 02:02 PM
In simple terms, it's basically just an interest payment. (It's really a scheduled periodic interest payment made prior to a bond's maturity).Per "Debtwire", which I can't link to unfortunately, the rumor is that Vanderbeek is trying to get a two-year extension on the maturity of the $80 million that's past due, in exchange for giving the lenders a "coupon bump", a term that I'm unfamiliar with, but which I assume means higher priority.

| 2012 Season | NJDevs FHL Champion | 2013 Season |
Posted 13 August 2012 - 02:58 PM
I know the Devils are in the top half of revenue, but isn't JVB still losing a **** ton trying to scrape together money to pay back the creditors? I feel like this is all counterproductive for him
Edited by devlman, 13 August 2012 - 03:01 PM.
Posted 13 August 2012 - 03:12 PM
He must feel that he can make the business model work. With a sweet deal with Newark and an increasing Season Ticket base, he may see a profitable franchise in the near-future.
I mean, i can feel for him because the debt he is struggling with is mostly from the arena. We needed a brand new one and he was a key figure in making it happen. After all the work in constructing it, rebuilding the marketing dept, etc.. I'm sure he wants to be around to see the fruits of his labor start paying dividends.
Posted 13 August 2012 - 03:32 PM
It's more than business for him, the guy's a legit Devils fan. If one of us owned the team, you can bet we'd be doing everything including begging (which is basically what JVB is doing now) to try to help us hang on to it. Most of these owners buy teams for reasons other than it's a good business anyway.
I'm at the point where I just want this to end, whether this means JVB gets flushed or not, preferably flushed if the best he can get is a stay of execution anyway. I do feel for him though.

Posted 13 August 2012 - 04:13 PM
Posted 13 August 2012 - 04:18 PM
In simple terms, it's basically just an interest payment. (It's really a scheduled periodic interest payment made prior to a bond's maturity).
So he's just offering to pay more of an interest rate to buy more time to make the payment. Aka: pushing these events on for another two years.

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users