Lockout 2012-2013 (Hockey's back!)
#181
Posted 03 October 2012 - 01:39 AM
--John Buccigross
#182
Posted 03 October 2012 - 06:44 AM
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=406581
No progress was made. Good job guys. You bunch of useless good for nothings.
I know many will come flocking back, probably me included, but I sense a lot more anger this time around...and a lot more awareness for the non-million and billionaires who will only get screwed by this squabbling. Will those who are angry and sick of it all actually stay away when this is resolved? Who knows, but the guess here is probably not enough to make the NHL sweat.
Here's the point I'm reaching: I still love hockey and everything about it...it's a great great sport and can be incredibly exciting, as we all know. But man I'm starting to hate the NHL and everything about it.
[Mark Messier]: A big, bald attention whore with a stupid Easter Island-lookin face. - from who else? DaneykoIsGod!
Even when Marty comes back maybe Larry should put Clemmensen to be on the goal during the shootouts.
Can the coach do that ? Switch the goalies 5 seconds to go in overtime? - Most priceless quote ever posted on a message board.
Martin Brodeur: THE MOST ALL-TIME WINS!, 12 straight seasons of 30+ wins, 3 Stanley Cups, 4 Vezina Trophies, and zero respect from too many so-called Devils "fans" who are either too young or too bandwagon to remember the much darker days of Sean Burke, Craig Billington, Bob Sauve, Alain Chevrier, and the talented but overwhelmed Chico Resch, among many others.
It's easy to support a great player when he's playing at his very best. It takes a true fan to support that same player during those rare moments and stretches when he's not. Babe Ruth went 0-4 some games, and sometimes Wayne Gretzky was held pointless. There may be such a thing as greatness, but no such thing as absolute perfection every single night.
#30 FOREVER!
20 out of 1,946 njdevs.com members agree: CR1976 is the Most Knowledgable Poster of 2008! Victory is mine...oh yes, victory is mine!
#183
Posted 03 October 2012 - 07:09 AM
I know many will come flocking back, probably me included, but I sense a lot more anger this time around...and a lot more awareness for the non-million and billionaires who will only get screwed by this squabbling. Will those who are angry and sick of it all actually stay away when this is resolved? Who knows, but the guess here is probably not enough to make the NHL sweat.
Here's the point I'm reaching: I still love hockey and everything about it...it's a great great sport and can be incredibly exciting, as we all know. But man I'm starting to hate the NHL and everything about it.
Things are very different in the economy for one, so definitely people are going to take a lockout more personally. For another, I think people realized in 2004 the system needed to be changed, one way or another. It doesn't fundamentally need changing now, as much as the owners may whine it does (and yes the players should be making closer to 50% than 57%). Just about any team can compete, and win in the playoffs as this year's postseason proved. This time around there's less tangible reason for this nonsense to be happening. Plus you have Bettman - already hated for '95 and '04, AND Fehr - hated universally for his role in baseball's nonsense both involved.
For me personally, this is why I never describe myself as an 'NHL fan'. People that describe themselves as NHL fans (and the same is true of 'NFL fans, MLB fans, etc') will watch more than their team play and as such take it more personally when the sport's not there. I pay attention to the league certainly but I won't actively sit down and watch games besides the Devils. When their season's done, generally I'm done watching hockey other than bits and pieces of games maybe. My loyalty's to them, not the NHL. Maybe I'd feel differently if I thought the Devils were a main heavy with these lockouts but this year in particular, I think ownership has more pressing things to worry about than the players' HRR.
The New Jersey Devils win Stanley Cups everywhere:
-NHL record for most road wins in the playoffs - 10-1 in '95 and 10-2 in '00
-NHL record for most home wins in the playoffs - 12-1 in '03
#184
Posted 03 October 2012 - 11:35 AM
--John Buccigross
#185
Posted 03 October 2012 - 11:41 AM
You don't watch the Stanley Cup Playoffs if the Devils aren't playing?
I don't watch complete games, I watch the last several minutes of a close game if that but I ain't staying up till 2 in the morning for a neutral game. I don't actively sit down and say I have to watch a Game 2 of Vancouver-Sharks. A cup clincher or watching a game to root against the Rangers or Flyers may be exceptions.
Edited by NJDevs4978, 03 October 2012 - 11:42 AM.
The New Jersey Devils win Stanley Cups everywhere:
-NHL record for most road wins in the playoffs - 10-1 in '95 and 10-2 in '00
-NHL record for most home wins in the playoffs - 12-1 in '03
#186
Posted 03 October 2012 - 02:34 PM
Here's the point I'm reaching: I still love hockey and everything about it...it's a great great sport and can be incredibly exciting, as we all know. But man I'm starting to hate the NHL and everything about it.
I was pretty firmly in the Owners' camp last time. I even thought losing a season was worth it for the hard cap, as I thought their prior system was structurally unsound. This time though It's just shameless greed on the owners' part with no vision for how to actually fix the league's money issues.
Intellectually I want to give up on the NHL. I want the owners to suffer somewhat for their complete lack of respect for their labor force. But once an agreement is reached I'll give up on all these sentiments and be right back watching games cause I love watching hockey played at the highest level and the NHL still is the only league that can offer that.
Sharks Fan: 2012-?
#187
Posted 03 October 2012 - 04:25 PM
I was pretty firmly in the Owners' camp last time. I even thought losing a season was worth it for the hard cap, as I thought their prior system was structurally unsound. This time though It's just shameless greed on the owners' part with no vision for how to actually fix the league's money issues.
Intellectually I want to give up on the NHL. I want the owners to suffer somewhat for their complete lack of respect for their labor force. But once an agreement is reached I'll give up on all these sentiments and be right back watching games cause I love watching hockey played at the highest level and the NHL still is the only league that can offer that.
Yeah, this is pretty much where I'm at. It shouldn't be up to the players to make the framework of the deal that eventually gets passed.
But the owners don't care. It's not about total revenue. It's about profit. And with cost certainty, any losses get eaten up by the players.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#188
Posted 04 October 2012 - 07:08 AM
"How about - hey owners, thanks for making me a mulit millionaire to play a game, giving me the opportunity to make millions of more dollars through endorsement deals and advertising (which I keep all to myself, despite our 'partnership'). Thanks for being the major stake holders, paying all the operating costs and taking all the risk, after all we are partners. Thanks for having years were you loose 20 million dollars yet I still get 100% of my paycheck, afterall we are partners"
#189
Posted 04 October 2012 - 08:42 AM
EDIT: and by the way i am neither pro NHLPA or pro owners. I think both sides are wrong in this. The owners for greed and concentrating on something that does not need to be drastically changed, and the players for their inability to compromise. When both sides end up at 50-50, everyone is going to wonder why it took so long.
Edited by njd3b1ink, 04 October 2012 - 08:46 AM.
#190
Posted 04 October 2012 - 01:31 PM
#191
Posted 04 October 2012 - 01:57 PM
Whelp, two weeks gone.
Yup.
http://prohockeytalk...hedule/related/
NHL cancels first two weeks of the schedule
It’s official, the lockout has cost the NHL and its players the first chunk of regular season games.
The NHL announced they’re canceling the first two weeks worth of the schedule from October 11-24 thanks to the lockout. In all, that makes 82 games to be canceled by the league. The wording of the NHL release leaves open the possibility the games could be rescheduled should a new CBA be worked out.
This marks the first time since the 2004-05 labor dispute that the league has canceled games. As you probably remember, the entire season was wiped out then.
While the league is doing that, Chris Johnston of The Canadian Press reports the two sides haven’t scheduled a date to meet again and bargain and it doesn’t appear likely they’ll get together until next week.
#192
Posted 04 October 2012 - 03:07 PM
“I think winning against them in the big stage, not just for me, but for the fans of New Jersey, people that are supporting us and always take a second seat to these guys for whatever reason, now they’ve got to be pretty happy going to work and going to school and doing all their things that they do." - Martin Brodeur
#193
Posted 04 October 2012 - 03:38 PM
http://www.foxnews.c...test=latestnews
Atleast fox got the team correct in their picture...
Edited by Dead, 04 October 2012 - 03:47 PM.
Is we have Kovy?
Section 114 & Kovy's Second Contract
#194
Posted 04 October 2012 - 03:55 PM
"We were extremely disappointed to have to make today’s announcement. The game deserves better, the fans deserve better.."
fvck you you fvcking idiots. The league could go on without the new CBA in place there's NO reason to lockout the players its STRICTLY for leverage in the negociations that they are doing it fvck them
www.SterioDesign.com
Who is it gonna be?

#195
Posted 04 October 2012 - 04:34 PM
That was never realistic. What incentive would the players have to give the owners a fair shake when they're getting their paychecks? The league simply can't go on if 2/3 of the owners are losing money.the owners are pissing me off so bad
"We were extremely disappointed to have to make today’s announcement. The game deserves better, the fans deserve better.."
fvck you you fvcking idiots. The league could go on without the new CBA in place there's NO reason to lockout the players its STRICTLY for leverage in the negociations that they are doing it fvck them
#196
Posted 04 October 2012 - 07:23 PM
No way, if the NHL allowed the players to play with no CBA they would have all the leverage and can strike at any part of the season. I dont agree with any sidebut the players saying they would play with 'good faith' is a load of crap.the owners are pissing me off so bad
"We were extremely disappointed to have to make today’s announcement. The game deserves better, the fans deserve better.."
fvck you you fvcking idiots. The league could go on without the new CBA in place there's NO reason to lockout the players its STRICTLY for leverage in the negociations that they are doing it fvck them
“I think winning against them in the big stage, not just for me, but for the fans of New Jersey, people that are supporting us and always take a second seat to these guys for whatever reason, now they’ve got to be pretty happy going to work and going to school and doing all their things that they do." - Martin Brodeur
#197
Posted 05 October 2012 - 07:34 AM
#198
Posted 05 October 2012 - 07:43 AM
Yup first two weeks gone for the regular season... This even made the main page at foxnews.com, cnn.com etc...
http://www.foxnews.c...test=latestnews
Atleast fox got the team correct in their picture...
I noticed the other day at Modells that they changed the look of the official game pucks. Not a fan of them over the most recent design.
#199
Posted 05 October 2012 - 11:27 AM
#200
Posted 05 October 2012 - 11:31 AM
Probably depends on how long they make the next CBA last.How many canceled games will it take to miss out on more money than what they're actually arguing over?
--John Buccigross
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











