Lockout 2012-2013 (Hockey's back!)
#821
Posted 23 November 2012 - 12:45 AM
The New Jersey Devils win Stanley Cups everywhere:
-NHL record for most road wins in the playoffs - 10-1 in '95 and 10-2 in '00
-NHL record for most home wins in the playoffs - 12-1 in '03
#822
Posted 23 November 2012 - 12:46 AM
I'm pretty sure this has woken up the owners. Up until this point they haven't really been fair, given in to any concessions. The owners aren't really negotiating in good faith, borderline in my opinion.
I doubt it. After seeing what happened with the NFL, the NHL owners definitely knew it was something in the NHLPAs toolkit. The NHL owners, or most of them, unlike the NFL are willing to call the bluff. If they were prepared to fold up shop in 2005 when decertification wasn't in the cards, imagine what they'd do now.

I collect spores, molds and fungus.
Hello fellow American. This you should vote me. I leave power. Good. Thank you, thank you. If you vote me, I'm hot. What? Taxes, they'll be lower... son. The Democratic vote is the right thing to do Philadelphia, so do.
How do you spot risk? How do you avoid risk? And what makes it so risky?
#823
Posted 23 November 2012 - 12:47 AM
I doubt it. After seeing what happened with the NFL, the NHL owners definitely knew it was something in the NHLPAs toolkit. The NHL owners, or most of them, unlike the NFL are willing to call the bluff. If they were prepared to fold up shop in 2005 when decertification wasn't in the cards, imagine what they'd do now.
Decertification doesn't really help the owners either though, since the cap/linkage would go bye-bye if they lost in court, as would the ability of at least 2/3 of the league to compete. It would be mutually assured destruction for all but the wealthiest markets and players.
Edited by NJDevs4978, 23 November 2012 - 12:48 AM.
The New Jersey Devils win Stanley Cups everywhere:
-NHL record for most road wins in the playoffs - 10-1 in '95 and 10-2 in '00
-NHL record for most home wins in the playoffs - 12-1 in '03
#824
Posted 23 November 2012 - 12:51 AM
Decertification doesn't really help the owners either though, since the cap/linkage would go bye-bye if they lost in court, as would the ability of at least 2/3 of the league to compete. It would be mutually assured destruction for all but the wealthiest markets and players.
Exactly. Unlike an NFL franchise, owning a hockey team is not a licesnse to print money. In other words, the people who own half of the teams in the league will say, I don't need to own a hockey team that badly.

I collect spores, molds and fungus.
Hello fellow American. This you should vote me. I leave power. Good. Thank you, thank you. If you vote me, I'm hot. What? Taxes, they'll be lower... son. The Democratic vote is the right thing to do Philadelphia, so do.
How do you spot risk? How do you avoid risk? And what makes it so risky?
#825
Posted 23 November 2012 - 12:54 AM
Yes I know it's much more than pre2005 (that is just short hand for basically no rules at all). And otherwise, you're missing my point. Decertification is indeed a nightmare for eighty percent of the league. So much so that without labor price fixing, they cannot survive, or could only survive playing in a B league, or being the Washington Generals to teams like the Rangers and Leafs, the exact same way that most English and Spanish soccer teams are complete jokes when compared to the big boys like Man U and Real Madrid. Decertification would be a pyrric victory for the players, and would be the end for teams like the Devils. Maybe you'll be lucky enough to get $15 million a year from the Rangers if you're Corey Perry (if they could throw $9 milion a year at Bobby Holik ten years ago, $15 mill per year is what a team that can pay as much as it wants would pay for Perry). Otherwise you'll get the $100k salary that a team like Florida could afford to pay you now that all of the other talented players are playing elsewhere.
If you don't believe me, please tell me how Man U has won more than half of the premier league championships over the past twenty years? Hint, it isn't because its management is good at sabremetrics.
I don't know how revenues are generated in English soccer. In the NHL right now, national TV revenues are shared even though some teams clearly generate almost nothing and some teams generate lots of money. But England is different than the US and Canada - English cities are much closer together. It'd be like if the entire NHL were concentrated in the US Northeast.
So yeah, a super league would probably form, but it would not mean the end for the Devils at all, much as how there are still many, many soccer clubs in England despite the fact that Man U is dominant. Furthermore, I don't think many NHL owners are vanity owners - among top teams, the Wings and Rangers are owned by people who would lose money to win a championship, but I don't see many others.
All this is moot - the NHL will never let it get to decertification if the gap is less than $1M per season per team, like it is now.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#826
Posted 23 November 2012 - 01:03 AM
Beat me to it.All this is moot - the NHL will never let it get to decertification if the gap is less than $1M per season per team, like it is now.
Edited by Zubie#8, 23 November 2012 - 01:04 AM.
“I think winning against them in the big stage, not just for me, but for the fans of New Jersey, people that are supporting us and always take a second seat to these guys for whatever reason, now they’ve got to be pretty happy going to work and going to school and doing all their things that they do." - Martin Brodeur
#827
Posted 23 November 2012 - 11:15 PM
per TSN
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=410123
Is we have Kovy?
Section 114 & Kovy's Second Contract
#828
Posted 24 November 2012 - 10:42 PM
#829
Posted 25 November 2012 - 04:30 AM
Not really related but just met Daly at Belissimos in Little Falls. Tried to make conversation, not at interested in talking about it...
Can't blame him.
Winner of the 2011-2012 RD Avatar Award
#830
Posted 26 November 2012 - 03:10 PM
@TSNBobMcKenzie
NHL and NHLPA have agreed to allow U.S. federal mediators to get involved in the labor dispute.
Interesting. Is this binding? I suppose not.
#831
Posted 26 November 2012 - 03:11 PM
#832
Posted 26 November 2012 - 03:14 PM
#833
Posted 26 November 2012 - 03:19 PM
-Terry Goodkind
Sex Panther cologne -- 50 percent of the time, it works every time.
-Anchorman
The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The second best time is now.
-Anonymous
Keeper of Section 212-213's wayward step
#834
Posted 26 November 2012 - 03:23 PM
The New Jersey Devils win Stanley Cups everywhere:
-NHL record for most road wins in the playoffs - 10-1 in '95 and 10-2 in '00
-NHL record for most home wins in the playoffs - 12-1 in '03
#835
Posted 26 November 2012 - 03:31 PM
2006 Pat Burns Award Winner(Most emotional Poster)
2006 JHL CHAMPION!!
2005 CHAMPION of the 1st Annual NJDevs Fantasy Wrestling League!!!
2005 Finalist 1st Annual NJDEVS Fantasy Baseball League
2005 Pat Burns Award Winner(Most emotional Poster)
2004 LockOut Trivia CHAMP!!!
Keeper of The original Welcome to Hell Forum, Jimmy Dowd, Brian Rolston, "Christmas Tree" Jersey's and the Original Trade Documents of the FREEZE man!!
BOM U11G Dynamite
#836
Posted 26 November 2012 - 03:52 PM
"The Devils are that zombie that takes an ax to the skull, a bullet to the temple and is set on fire … and yet keeps lumbering along to the annoyance of all the other zombies." - Puck Daddy
#837
Posted 26 November 2012 - 04:19 PM

"I don't like those Rangers fans from New Jersey." - Jim Dowd
#838
Posted 26 November 2012 - 04:21 PM
Not to ruin any optimism, but they brought in mediators back in '04-05. Multiple times, IIRC.
You are correct, but it was much later in the process.
Even so, mediators won't help here. What's there to mediate when one side refuses to compromise in any way?
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#839
Posted 26 November 2012 - 04:22 PM
You are correct, but it was much later in the process.
Even so, mediators won't help here. What's there to mediate when one side refuses to compromise in any way?
lol at maintaining it's 'one' side that refuses to compromise. When the PA comes up with a fully linked 50-50 system then I'll buy that comment. All they did last week was try to package a favorable proposal differently.
The New Jersey Devils win Stanley Cups everywhere:
-NHL record for most road wins in the playoffs - 10-1 in '95 and 10-2 in '00
-NHL record for most home wins in the playoffs - 12-1 in '03
#840
Posted 26 November 2012 - 06:08 PM
lol at maintaining it's 'one' side that refuses to compromise. When the PA comes up with a fully linked 50-50 system then I'll buy that comment. All they did last week was try to package a favorable proposal differently.
Nothing like buying the league's drivel hook line and sinker. Why is 50-50 fair, and why should the system be fully linked, and why should the PA have to make a full offer that the league accepts? It's called a negotiation. If the league doesn't like something in the PA's offers, it should counter. Instead it runs out of the room telling anyone who will listen that Fehr doesn't represent the players' interests, that he refuses to negotiate, and people believe it.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











