Jump to content


Hockey’s Wealth Redistribution Problem:What’s Really Behind The NH

  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1 hattrick


    Assistant Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,382 posts

Posted 20 December 2012 - 10:25 AM


The NHL would like you to believe that owners give too much money to players. That was management’s position almost a decade ago—the last time the league locked out its talent—when players were getting three-quarters of total revenues. After an entire season was voided, the NHL Players Association caved, agreeing to lower its members’ share of revenue to 57%. Peace and harmony have ensued since, but now the owners want an even bigger piece of the pie, claiming financial hardship.
Don’t believe them, not for a minute. First, as I’ve written about before, sports team accounting is misleading at best, given that club owners can claim to be losing money when a) the losses are on paper only; b) there are tax benefits from whatever losses happen to be real; and c) the value of their teams continue to rise.

  • 0
Good Is Not Good Where Better Is Expected

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users