Jump to content

Photo

NYT: How come Brodeur is still so good?


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#41 Colorado Rockies 1976

Colorado Rockies 1976

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,483 posts

Posted 26 February 2013 - 11:56 AM

Exactly. You want an example of a compiler, look at Cujo. Never led the league in any category, yet he's 4th on the all-time wins list.

 

I give him credit though, there is something to be said for being good for as long as he was, though like you imply, he's definitely not the 4th-best NHL goalie ever.  He was good and durable for a long time.  Brodeur was good, very good, sometimes great, also durable for a long time and more importantly, won the big hardware (Vezinas, Cups, etc).      



Agreed, the NYC media as a whole doesn't do much scrutinizing of their Manhattan hockey team. But they all do tend to fall over themselves hopping on the bandwagon whenever the team has even the slightest success.

 

Playing for the Rangers is definitely nothing compared to playing for the Yankees, Mets, Knicks, Jets or Giants.  Way more pressure playing for those teams. 


  • 0
THE NHL MUST LOVE THE DEVILS - from who else? A RANGER fan!
[Mark Messier]: A big, bald attention whore with a stupid Easter Island-lookin face. - from who else? DaneykoIsGod!

Even when Marty comes back maybe Larry should put Clemmensen to be on the goal during the shootouts.
Can the coach do that ? Switch the goalies 5 seconds to go in overtime?
- Most priceless quote ever posted on a message board.

Martin Brodeur: THE MOST ALL-TIME WINS!, 12 straight seasons of 30+ wins, 3 Stanley Cups, 4 Vezina Trophies, and zero respect from too many so-called Devils "fans" who are either too young or too bandwagon to remember the much darker days of Sean Burke, Craig Billington, Bob Sauve, Alain Chevrier, and the talented but overwhelmed Chico Resch, among many others.

It's easy to support a great player when he's playing at his very best. It takes a true fan to support that same player during those rare moments and stretches when he's not. Babe Ruth went 0-4 some games, and sometimes Wayne Gretzky was held pointless. There may be such a thing as greatness, but no such thing as absolute perfection every single night.

#30 FOREVER!

20 out of 1,946 njdevs.com members agree: CR1976 is the Most Knowledgable Poster of 2008! Victory is mine...oh yes, victory is mine!

#42 95Crash

95Crash

    General Manager

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,878 posts

Posted 26 February 2013 - 02:12 PM

I give him credit though, there is something to be said for being good for as long as he was, though like you imply, he's definitely not the 4th-best NHL goalie ever.  He was good and durable for a long time.  Brodeur was good, very good, sometimes great, also durable for a long time and more importantly, won the big hardware (Vezinas, Cups, etc).      



 

Playing for the Rangers is definitely nothing compared to playing for the Yankees, Mets, Knicks, Jets or Giants.  Way more pressure playing for those teams. 

 

Probably because aside from the beat writers, hardly anyone in the local media knows enough about hockey to properly criticize it.  All they can do is cheer like fans when the team does well.

 

With baseball, basketball and football, everyone in the newspapers and on TV is an expert, or so it seems.


  • 0






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users