Jump to content

Photo

Leagues realignment plan now official. Begins next season.


  • Please log in to reply
142 replies to this topic

#81 MadDog2020

MadDog2020

    A Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,054 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 08:48 AM

I need clarification on one thing, that being playoff seeding: since 8 teams in each conference still make the playoffs, are the teams still going to be seeded 1-8, 2-7, 3-6, 4-5? I'm taking it it will not be strictly divisional playoffs in the first 2 rounds now that they implemented these wild cards, correct?

From espn...http://m.espn.go.com...414&src=desktop
The new plan calls for divisional playoffs, not conference playoffs as the NHL currently has. The division winner with the most regular-season points will play the lowest-seeded wild-card team in the first round, with the other division winner playing the other wild-card team.

So the division winner with the most points plays the wild card with the least points, while the other division winner plays the other wild card... Meaning the other two series are straight divisional then? That's the way it sounds.

Edited by MadDog2020, 08 March 2013 - 08:56 AM.

  • 0
iq0p.pngUploaded with ImageShack.com

#82 mouse

mouse

    Assistant Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,520 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 09:11 AM

Like trying to kill a mouse with a hydrogen bomb.

Please don't.


  • 1

Sumus Legio
You don't turn this around in a couple shifts. Its going to take a little time, but I know the guys will come back. Because I can see it. -- Jacques Lemaire

 

sguq.jpg


#83 mouse

mouse

    Assistant Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,520 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 09:21 AM

Still can't believe Columbus has an NHL team.

I can. They have more money than Cleveland, and Ohio is a pretty good hockey state, especially at the amateur level. If the product on the ice wasn't such a joke, I think they'd be selling a ton of tickets, but they never won casual fans over, or played well enough to get the Pens and Wings fans to care about the locals. That said, if they put a good product together (like when the Devils hired Lou), they'll start getting the kids to come out, and they could be big time in 20 years or so.


  • 0

Sumus Legio
You don't turn this around in a couple shifts. Its going to take a little time, but I know the guys will come back. Because I can see it. -- Jacques Lemaire

 

sguq.jpg


#84 eaglejelly

eaglejelly

    Head Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,229 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 09:32 AM

Math Question:
You have 30 teams that need to be divided into 2 conferences. How many teams go in each conference?

My kids would get an F in math if they answered 14 and 16. This is such an obvious BS. In one conference you have a 50% chance of making the playoffs, in the other over 57%.

The NHL need to have the conjoins to tell the Redwings that they are not one of the 15 most eastern teams and therefore do not belong in the eastern conference.

And divisional playoffs where you can play teams that are not in your division? You can’t keep the cake and eat it too.


Edited by eaglejelly, 08 March 2013 - 09:33 AM.

  • 0

#85 squishyx

squishyx

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,321 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 09:33 AM

I don't get them sticking to division playoffs if five teams from one division can make it.  So someone like Carolina can finish fifth in our division, yet win another division's 'title'?

Yep. It's pretty dumb. I hope they don't actually give out titles or banners for any playoff success because it would obviously create some asterisk marks in the records.
  • 0

#86 squishyx

squishyx

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,321 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 09:36 AM

Math Question:
You have 30 teams that need to be divided into 2 conferences. How many teams go in each conference?
My kids would get an F in math if they answered 14 and 16. This is such an obvious BS. In one conference you have a 50% chance of making the playoffs, in the other over 57%.
The NHL need to have the conjoins to tell the Redwings that they are not one of the 15 most eastern teams and therefore do not belong in the eastern conference.
And divisional playoffs where you can play teams that are not in your division? You can’t keep the cake and eat it too.

I think they are setting up for expansion, Seattle and KC would fit right in easily under this plan to help balance the equation. The 14/16 thing doesn't really bother me, the Southeast has so many terrible teams that it's not likely going to matter and the wildcard does to some extent mitigate the problem. However the wildcard is so terrible and they should abolish it and just deal with the fall out from uneven conferences.
  • 0

#87 MadDog2020

MadDog2020

    A Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,054 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 09:43 AM

Math Question:You have 30 teams that need to be divided into 2 conferences. How many teams go in each conference?My kids would get an F in math if they answered 14 and 16. This is such an obvious BS. In one conference you have a 50% chance of making the playoffs, in the other over 57%.The NHL need to have the conjoins to tell the Redwings that they are not one of the 15 most eastern teams and therefore do not belong in the eastern conference.And divisional playoffs where you can play teams that are not in your division? You can’t keep the cake and eat it too.I think they are setting up for expansion, Seattle and KC would fit right in easily under this plan to help balance the equation. The 14/16 thing doesn't really bother me, the Southeast has so many terrible teams that it's not likely going to matter and the wildcard does to some extent mitigate the problem. However the wildcard is so terrible and they should abolish it and just deal with the fall out from uneven conferences.

What about Quebec City? It's now set up so that you can't put a team in QC without moving Detroit or Columbus BACK to the west. Maybe that's one of the reasons they agreed to two years.
  • 0
iq0p.pngUploaded with ImageShack.com

#88 mouse

mouse

    Assistant Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,520 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 09:44 AM

Math Question:
You have 30 teams that need to be divided into 2 conferences. How many teams go in each conference?

My kids would get an F in math if they answered 14 and 16. This is such an obvious BS. In one conference you have a 50% chance of making the playoffs, in the other over 57%.

The NHL need to have the conjoins to tell the Redwings that they are not one of the 15 most eastern teams and therefore do not belong in the eastern conference.

And divisional playoffs where you can play teams that are not in your division? You can’t keep the cake and eat it too.

Eh, there's always gonna be some unfairness. The western teams travel more, so they have a tougher season. The southeast is currently terrible, and division 2 is therefore weaker than the rest, but that could change. I don't love the plan, but 14 16 isn't the biggest disaster, and if they are indeed planning expansion, it could look good in a couple of years.


  • 0

Sumus Legio
You don't turn this around in a couple shifts. Its going to take a little time, but I know the guys will come back. Because I can see it. -- Jacques Lemaire

 

sguq.jpg


#89 jagknife

jagknife

    Assistant Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,531 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 09:45 AM

Eh, there's always gonna be some unfairness. The western teams travel more, so they have a tougher season. The southeast is currently terrible, and division 2 is therefore weaker than the rest, but that could change. I don't love the plan, but 14 16 isn't the biggest disaster, and if they are indeed planning expansion, it could look good in a couple of years.

 

Also, Being the best team in the "west" divisions doesn't mean you get a spot in the Cup Finals, it just says you have a spot in the final 4.

 

The Cup could be Devils-Canadiens, hypothetically speaking.


  • 0

NewKeeperSig.png of each of Toronto's 6 shots on goal in Game 6


#90 squishyx

squishyx

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,321 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 09:52 AM

What about Quebec City? It's now set up so that you can't put a team in QC without moving Detroit or Columbus BACK to the west. Maybe that's one of the reasons they agreed to two years.

I think QC or a another Toronto-area franchise is viable, but they approved this plan which as you note isn't as flexible for it. I doubt they would throw Columbus (it won't be Detroit) back into the west to accommodate another eastern team but I guess it's possible, or maybe some other weird alignment plan. 3 conferences go go!
  • 0

#91 squishyx

squishyx

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,321 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 09:56 AM

Also, Being the best team in the "west" divisions doesn't mean you get a spot in the Cup Finals, it just says you have a spot in the final 4.
 
The Cup could be Devils-Canadiens, hypothetically speaking.

Hrm, I'm not so sure that's been fully revealed yet. Do you a source about the layout that suggests the final 4 are re-seeded?
  • 0

#92 jagknife

jagknife

    Assistant Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,531 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 10:01 AM

Hrm, I'm not so sure that's been fully revealed yet. Do you a source about the layout that suggests the final 4 are re-seeded?

 

I believe Dreger said it last week when this initially broke. His example, if I'm not mistaken, was Boston-Rangers.

 

Could definitely be wrong though.


  • 0

NewKeeperSig.png of each of Toronto's 6 shots on goal in Game 6


#93 squishyx

squishyx

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,321 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 10:11 AM

I believe Dreger said it last week when this initially broke. His example, if I'm not mistaken, was Boston-Rangers.
 
Could definitely be wrong though.

Ah, that actually sounds kinda cool. This playoff structure is going to seem so weird to non-hockey fans, "It's divisional playoffs where sometimes a team from Div B plays against Div A but not Div C and D, but only for 2 rounds".
  • 0

#94 ATLL765

ATLL765

    Assistant Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,482 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 11:03 AM

Ah, that actually sounds kinda cool. This playoff structure is going to seem so weird to non-hockey fans, "It's divisional playoffs where sometimes a team from Div B plays against Div A but not Div C and D, but only for 2 rounds".

It'll be super awesome when all the friends of mine I converted into NHL fans during the playoffs last year are baffled next year. I can see the thousands of questions now. Wait, I don't get it. How did this team end up playing this person but they were in this division and even though they had less points than someone who didn't make it, they're still in the playoffs and have won a division they're not in? Because. Make sense?


Edited by ATLL765, 08 March 2013 - 11:03 AM.

  • 0

#95 Triumph

Triumph

    A Legend

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 28,080 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 11:42 AM

The first plan had re-seeding in it but I don't think this one does.


  • 0

http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
 


#96 Chuck the Duck

Chuck the Duck

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,646 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 12:04 PM

Ah, that actually sounds kinda cool. This playoff structure is going to seem so weird to non-hockey fans, "It's divisional playoffs where sometimes a team from Div B plays against Div A but not Div C and D, but only for 2 rounds".

 

If they go with this plan for the playoffs, it will be almost as ridiculous as the MLS playoff system was a few years ago when the Red Bulls won the WESTERN conference championship before losing the MLS Cup.  I'm fine with the conference realignment, but hate the proposed playoff system and wildcards idea that was reported a week or 2 ago.


  • 0
Posted Image

#97 squishyx

squishyx

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,321 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 12:18 PM

If they go with this plan for the playoffs, it will be almost as ridiculous as the MLS playoff system was a few years ago when the Red Bulls won the WESTERN conference championship before losing the MLS Cup.  I'm fine with the conference realignment, but hate the proposed playoff system and wildcards idea that was reported a week or 2 ago.

I agree wild cards are dumb, but I wouldn't have a problem with re-seeding divisional winners. Just don't think of it as a conference championship, if they ever remove wildcards then the term conference doesn't need to be applied at all. They only need it now to distinguish which divisional winners play which wildcards.
  • 0

#98 Satans Hockey

Satans Hockey

    A Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,304 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 12:20 PM

If they go with this plan for the playoffs, it will be almost as ridiculous as the MLS playoff system was a few years ago when the Red Bulls won the WESTERN conference championship before losing the MLS Cup. I'm fine with the conference realignment, but hate the proposed playoff system and wildcards idea that was reported a week or 2 ago.


Its amazing isn't it? The MLS finally got their playoff system figured out last year and now the NHL goes and screws up theirs.

I'm so sick of the NHL changing sh!t. Does any other league really make as many major changes as the NHL? Its a joke.
  • 0

#99 devlman

devlman

    General Manager

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,135 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:07 PM

The Red Wings can go to hell. Theyve always been a Western team and have always had great success and fan support. To throw the rest of the league into the toilet just so they can be in the Eastern Conference is ridiculous


  • 0

#100 DevsMan84

DevsMan84

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,495 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:15 PM

The Red Wings can go to hell. Theyve always been a Western team and have always had great success and fan support. To throw the rest of the league into the toilet just so they can be in the Eastern Conference is ridiculous


I agree. This whole dumb realignment was only done to appease their whining. Also by having this and saving them money for travel, they also threw Florida and Tampa under the bus.
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users