Jump to content

Photo

It is a retool not a rebuild


  • Please log in to reply
189 replies to this topic

#101 ATLL765

ATLL765

    Assistant Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,263 posts

Posted 30 April 2013 - 12:24 PM

I want to keep Clarkson, Elias and Harold, you can build off this.

 

I think Tallinder and maybe A-Train are done.

I think Anton has to be our buyout. If not him, who? I guess if they bought out Sal, it'd be ok, but that looks much worse than buying out Anton who isn't the captain. Tallinder is better than he's looked, but having played sporadically hasn't helped. I do think 3 of Sal, Volch, Tally and Zid are gone by trade deadline next year or sooner. I don't think we will go an entire season without playing a younger guy on D again.


  • 0

#102 MantaRay

MantaRay

    A Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,431 posts

Posted 30 April 2013 - 12:25 PM

I think Anton has to be our buyout. If not him, who? I guess if they bought out Sal, it'd be ok, but that looks much worse than buying out Anton who isn't the captain. Tallinder is better than he's looked, but having played sporadically hasn't helped. I do think 3 of Sal, Volch, Tally and Zid are gone by trade deadline next year or sooner. I don't think we will go an entire season without playing a younger guy on D again.

 

Isn't Zid a UFA this year?


  • 0
I was wrong to ever doubt the powers of Lou Lamoriello.
IN LOU WE TRUST @Manta04


Posted Image

#103 ghdi

ghdi

    General Manager

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,416 posts

Posted 01 May 2013 - 12:44 AM

I'm fully prepared for and willing to let Clarkson walk. 


  • 0

#104 Zubie#8

Zubie#8

    Head Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,505 posts

Posted 01 May 2013 - 12:56 AM

Isn't Zid a UFA this year?

Yessir, but I would be willing him to give him a one year deal, he brings a dimension that none of our guys can bring on defense.


  • 0

believe-zubrus.jpg

 


#105 ATLL765

ATLL765

    Assistant Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,263 posts

Posted 01 May 2013 - 10:42 AM

Isn't Zid a UFA this year?

My thoughts were more than 3 of them won't be brought back/traded/not here due to some reason. I just don't see how we keep 8 D through the entire year again. We have to drop at least 2 to make it even reasonable.

We have these guys:
Greene
Larsson
Fayne
Tallinder
Zidlicky
Salvador
Volchenkov
Harrold

My guess is 3 of the last 5 I listed are gone by end of trade deadline next year. In my mind, there's no way we can't hold a spot for one of the young d prospects next year. We have Urbom, Gelinas and Merrill now who are by most accounts, ready to see some NHL action, if not ready for regular duty. so I just do not see how we don't work at least one of them in at all times, at least until one outshines the rest or they all fail miserably and I go cry in a corner.


  • 0

#106 SterioDesign

SterioDesign

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,967 posts

Posted 01 May 2013 - 11:13 AM

My thoughts were more than 3 of them won't be brought back/traded/not here due to some reason. I just don't see how we keep 8 D through the entire year again. We have to drop at least 2 to make it even reasonable.

We have these guys:
Greene
Larsson
Fayne
Tallinder
Zidlicky
Salvador
Volchenkov
Harrold

My guess is 3 of the last 5 I listed are gone by end of trade deadline next year. In my mind, there's no way we can't hold a spot for one of the young d prospects next year. We have Urbom, Gelinas and Merrill now who are by most accounts, ready to see some NHL action, if not ready for regular duty. so I just do not see how we don't work at least one of them in at all times, at least until one outshines the rest or they all fail miserably and I go cry in a corner.

 

this is true but we all know Lou will go for the cheap repair 1- cause he's Lou 2-cause we're on a budget. Then he won't get rid of Salvador even though he clearly should and he'll probably let go a guy like Harrold or Zid who were at least contributing offensively.

 

i was encourage for next year trying to think of all the moves we could make, until someone mentioned that we're dealing with an internal budget... means we won't see big buyouts or signing good players who could help. And possibly not re-signing Clarkson. 

 

plus Lou said 8 D is the perfect number and that "because of the group we had, its not something that was causing problems or for the guys".... yeah Lou ignore the multiple reports about Fayne and Larsson admitting it was hurting his confidence. 


  • 0

www.SterioDesign.com

 


#107 MantaRay

MantaRay

    A Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,431 posts

Posted 01 May 2013 - 11:16 AM

Yessir, but I would be willing him to give him a one year deal, he brings a dimension that none of our guys can bring on defense.

 

We NEED to bring him back for that very reason, aside from him and Harrold we don't have that dimension.

 

I think we resusitated his career, but I think if Elias doesn't sign, he is gone too.  I know they are very close.


  • 0
I was wrong to ever doubt the powers of Lou Lamoriello.
IN LOU WE TRUST @Manta04


Posted Image

#108 ATLL765

ATLL765

    Assistant Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,263 posts

Posted 01 May 2013 - 12:54 PM

this is true but we all know Lou will go for the cheap repair 1- cause he's Lou 2-cause we're on a budget. Then he won't get rid of Salvador even though he clearly should and he'll probably let go a guy like Harrold or Zid who were at least contributing offensively.

 

i was encourage for next year trying to think of all the moves we could make, until someone mentioned that we're dealing with an internal budget... means we won't see big buyouts or signing good players who could help. And possibly not re-signing Clarkson. 

 

plus Lou said 8 D is the perfect number and that "because of the group we had, its not something that was causing problems or for the guys".... yeah Lou ignore the multiple reports about Fayne and Larsson admitting it was hurting his confidence. 

How is this not a cheap fix? We're gonna use an amnesty buyout. I'd be surprised to see any team not use at least one of their amnesty buyouts. I think the favorite for our amnesty is Volch right now. So assuming he's gone next year, that leaves Zid and Harrold as your UFAs, Harrold comes back as a 7th, he's a perfect 7. Zid I think is 50/50 whether he gets resigned. Tallinder is getting traded, somewhere. Next year he'll have 1 year left and his cap hit isn't terrible, so I think someone will take him if he's playing anything close to alright and send us a pick in return for next draft. That leaves Sal and Zid. I think one of these two won't be here next year either. I think it's unlikely we buyout Sal, so unless we DON'T resign Harrold, I think Zid doesn't come back next year.

Either way, this ends up with us not spending more money than we would have otherwise.


  • 0

#109 SterioDesign

SterioDesign

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,967 posts

Posted 01 May 2013 - 04:26 PM

How is this not a cheap fix? We're gonna use an amnesty buyout. I'd be surprised to see any team not use at least one of their amnesty buyouts. I think the favorite for our amnesty is Volch right now. So assuming he's gone next year, that leaves Zid and Harrold as your UFAs, Harrold comes back as a 7th, he's a perfect 7. Zid I think is 50/50 whether he gets resigned. Tallinder is getting traded, somewhere. Next year he'll have 1 year left and his cap hit isn't terrible, so I think someone will take him if he's playing anything close to alright and send us a pick in return for next draft. That leaves Sal and Zid. I think one of these two won't be here next year either. I think it's unlikely we buyout Sal, so unless we DON'T resign Harrold, I think Zid doesn't come back next year.

Either way, this ends up with us not spending more money than we would have otherwise.

 

you know with those buyouts that the players is still getting paid by the owner right? they don't just... vanish his contract, the cap hit doesnt count and thats it.  You think vanderbeek would be please throwing 12.75m out the window watching volchenkov playing somewhere else? and 6.5millions for Salvador? especially since we're on an internal budget


Edited by SterioDesign, 01 May 2013 - 04:26 PM.

  • 0

www.SterioDesign.com

 


#110 Devils731

Devils731

    A Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,505 posts

Posted 01 May 2013 - 04:42 PM

you know with those buyouts that the players is still getting paid by the owner right? they don't just... vanish his contract, the cap hit doesnt count and thats it.  You think vanderbeek would be please throwing 12.75m out the window watching volchenkov playing somewhere else? and 6.5millions for Salvador? especially since we're on an internal budget

 

We actually don't know what the Devils internal budget looks like.  I believe the Devils threw a large contract offer Parise's way last offseason and it's likely Vanderbeek is much more free to spend money after the debt restructuring the team went through, the only question is how much more free.


  • 0
Your unconditional rejection of violence makes you smugly think of yourselves as noble, as enlightened, but in reality it is nothing less than abject moral capitulation to evil. Unconditional rejection of self-defense, because you think its a supposed surrender to violence, leaves you no resort but begging for mercy or offering appeasement.

-Terry Goodkind


Sex Panther cologne -- 50 percent of the time, it works every time.

-Anchorman

The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The second best time is now.

-Anonymous

Keeper of Section 212-213's wayward step

#111 Triumph

Triumph

    A Legend

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 27,794 posts

Posted 01 May 2013 - 04:43 PM

How is this not a cheap fix? We're gonna use an amnesty buyout. I'd be surprised to see any team not use at least one of their amnesty buyouts. I think the favorite for our amnesty is Volch right now. So assuming he's gone next year, that leaves Zid and Harrold as your UFAs, Harrold comes back as a 7th, he's a perfect 7. Zid I think is 50/50 whether he gets resigned. Tallinder is getting traded, somewhere. Next year he'll have 1 year left and his cap hit isn't terrible, so I think someone will take him if he's playing anything close to alright and send us a pick in return for next draft. That leaves Sal and Zid. I think one of these two won't be here next year either. I think it's unlikely we buyout Sal, so unless we DON'T resign Harrold, I think Zid doesn't come back next year.

Either way, this ends up with us not spending more money than we would have otherwise.

 

There will be a lot of teams that won't use their amnesty buyouts.  They cost money, one.  Two, if you run a prudent franchise, there's no need to buy anyone out.  Three, if you're a floor team, there's no reason to use a compliance buyout as that could ultimately cost you money.  Teams like Dallas, Nashville, and the Islanders aren't using compliance buyouts.


  • 0

http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
 


#112 SterioDesign

SterioDesign

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,967 posts

Posted 01 May 2013 - 07:30 PM

We actually don't know what the Devils internal budget looks like.  I believe the Devils threw a large contract offer Parise's way last offseason and it's likely Vanderbeek is much more free to spend money after the debt restructuring the team went through, the only question is how much more free.


Yeah but its one thing to throw 12m to get a guy on the ice and its something else to throw away 12m to get one off the ice
  • 0

www.SterioDesign.com

 


#113 Triumph

Triumph

    A Legend

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 27,794 posts

Posted 02 May 2013 - 09:36 AM

Yeah but its one thing to throw 12m to get a guy on the ice and its something else to throw away 12m to get one off the ice

 

Amnesty buyouts are for 2/3rds of a player's contract extended over double the remaining years on the contract.  So NJ would have to pay 8.5M extended over 6 years to get rid of Volchenkov.  I don't think they will do it - it's not like they are close to the salary cap, and it's not like Volchenkov is playing at a level below what we would expect from an NHL defenseman.  

 

I believe, like 731, that the Devils' internal budget is close to this coming year's salary cap.  They've spent that much money before, and they must've had a decent year financially even though they missed the playoffs.


  • 0

http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
 


#114 ATLL765

ATLL765

    Assistant Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,263 posts

Posted 02 May 2013 - 10:07 AM

you know with those buyouts that the players is still getting paid by the owner right? they don't just... vanish his contract, the cap hit doesnt count and thats it.  You think vanderbeek would be please throwing 12.75m out the window watching volchenkov playing somewhere else? and 6.5millions for Salvador? especially since we're on an internal budget

I was talking strictly in terms of next year, where we'd pay Volch, if he's bought out, $1.4xxM, which is $2.8xxM less than what he would have gotten, so we says $2.8 something million and we replace him with a young guy costing less than $1M, so that brings the total payment for 1 non playing d-man and the guy who is playing in that spot to $2.4xM for the year, which is less than $4.25.


  • 0

#115 redruM

redruM

    Hockey God

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,487 posts

Posted 02 May 2013 - 10:17 AM

I'm probably in the minority, but I'd be OK if Sal, VOl, Tal & Zid were all gone next year...  fresh young legs on defense!!!


  • 0
Posted Image

2006 Pat Burns Award Winner(Most emotional Poster)
2006 JHL CHAMPION!!
2005 CHAMPION of the 1st Annual NJDevs Fantasy Wrestling League!!!
2005 Finalist 1st Annual NJDEVS Fantasy Baseball League
2005 Pat Burns Award Winner(Most emotional Poster)
2004 LockOut Trivia CHAMP!!!


Keeper of The original Welcome to Hell Forum, Jimmy Dowd, Brian Rolston, "Christmas Tree" Jersey's and the Original Trade Documents of the FREEZE man!!


BOM U11G Dynamite

Posted Image

#116 Lateralous

Lateralous

    Senior Devil

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 589 posts

Posted 02 May 2013 - 10:42 AM

I'm probably in the minority, but I'd be OK if Sal, VOl, Tal & Zid were all gone next year...  fresh young legs on defense!!!

Wow, that would be a lot of growing pains with the young guys all at once.  It would also be tough to give guys sheltered minutes that way. I might feel differently if Lou hadn't already pissed away next years 1st, but now every loss is going to grate that much more.     

 

I would like to see Urbom on the 3rd pairing.  From what I've read, Gelinas could use an extra year in Albany to work on his D and I wouldn't mind Merrill getting a year down there as well. 

 

I still think you have to keep Zidlicky around for the offensive element in his game and one of Vol/Sal for some muscle in the back.  


  • 0

#117 ghdi

ghdi

    General Manager

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,416 posts

Posted 02 May 2013 - 11:11 AM

I'm probably in the minority, but I'd be OK if Sal, VOl, Tal & Zid were all gone next year...  fresh young legs on defense!!!

 

I dont think you're in the minority. I think the majority of people wouldnt mind seeing that, the problem is that its an incredible amount of change at one position in one swoop and it sends the team the wrong message as blame for this season is not down to one group or position. I think we'll be lucky if just one of them is gone come opening night and my bet would be on Tallinder or Zid being the goner, if any.

 

If all 3 end up leaving before the end of 13-14, it will be staggered, one before, one around Dec-Jan, and the last at the deadline. That also gives new guys a chance to get up to speed somewhat instead of throwing them to the wolves in our new conference.


Edited by ghdi, 02 May 2013 - 11:13 AM.

  • 0

#118 NewarkDevil5

NewarkDevil5

    Head Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,192 posts

Posted 02 May 2013 - 11:21 AM

I posted this in the wrong thread it seems. It's more relevant to the discussion in this one.

 

Let's look at Volchenkov from a business or sports team owner's perspective and correct my facts if I'm wrong:


 


Signed to a contract paying him $4.25 Million/year for 3 more years

Play level has fallen to the point where younger cheaper prospects could provide similar if not better level of play

Amnesty Buyout reduces budget line-item to $1.42 Million/year for 6 years while necessitating promoting a younger player getting paid $870k for a total cost of $2.29 Million/year for the first couple years

 

From looking at those facts I take the Amnesty Buyout almost every time because you're actually saving real dollars (almost $2 million worth) per year for the first 3 years and by the time you're left with the back end of the 3 years you'll have to assume that things won't be as tight otherwise you wouldn't want to be in this business in the first place. This deal gives you real money now in your pocket which is more important than small money being spent down the road.

 

From a hockey perspective Volchenkov's been mostly lousy. The few occasions he's been good have not made up for the majority of his play being lousy. It just doesn't make sense to keep a guy at that pay scale when his level of play is not appreciably better than what you would get for 1/5 the price.


  • 0

Newark: The City of New Jersey

gallery_45_180_172422.png


#119 Triumph

Triumph

    A Legend

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 27,794 posts

Posted 02 May 2013 - 11:40 AM

I posted this in the wrong thread it seems. It's more relevant to the discussion in this one.

 

Let's look at Volchenkov from a business or sports team owner's perspective and correct my facts if I'm wrong:


 


Signed to a contract paying him $4.25 Million/year for 3 more years

Play level has fallen to the point where younger cheaper prospects could provide similar if not better level of play

Amnesty Buyout reduces budget line-item to $1.42 Million/year for 6 years while necessitating promoting a younger player getting paid $870k for a total cost of $2.29 Million/year for the first couple years

 

From looking at those facts I take the Amnesty Buyout almost every time because you're actually saving real dollars (almost $2 million worth) per year for the first 3 years and by the time you're left with the back end of the 3 years you'll have to assume that things won't be as tight otherwise you wouldn't want to be in this business in the first place. This deal gives you real money now in your pocket which is more important than small money being spent down the road.

 

From a hockey perspective Volchenkov's been mostly lousy. The few occasions he's been good have not made up for the majority of his play being lousy. It just doesn't make sense to keep a guy at that pay scale when his level of play is not appreciably better than what you would get for 1/5 the price.

 

Your second assumption is a large one, and is why I don't think he will be bought out.  I don't think the Devils think that, and I don't think they really have reason to think that.  He'll play his 60 games next year and we'll see where things stand after that.  If his play really has fallen off, then he'll definitely be a candidate for a buyout.  Young defensemen don't always pan out, and Volchenkov is basically a lock to get injured at some point, so they can get a look at his ostensible replacement then.


  • 0

http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
 


#120 NewarkDevil5

NewarkDevil5

    Head Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,192 posts

Posted 02 May 2013 - 11:53 AM

Your second assumption is a large one, and is why I don't think he will be bought out.  I don't think the Devils think that, and I don't think they really have reason to think that.  He'll play his 60 games next year and we'll see where things stand after that.  If his play really has fallen off, then he'll definitely be a candidate for a buyout.  Young defensemen don't always pan out, and Volchenkov is basically a lock to get injured at some point, so they can get a look at his ostensible replacement then.

 

The Devils can use 2 Amnesty Buyouts between this summer and next summer. Maybe they give Anton one more year or maybe they don't. In my opinion, if they are really as cash-strapped as everyone's trying to make out, they'd probably do it this summer. As far as his play is concerned, I can't speak to what Lou or Deboer think of his level of play, but I will say that from where I sit in watching him play he came off as our worst defenseman this year and he's the highest paid one to boot.


  • 0

Newark: The City of New Jersey

gallery_45_180_172422.png





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users