MC79hockey did an in-depth look at NJ's bizarre territorial results from last year:
Jump to content
Posted 02 October 2013 - 12:04 PM
This quote from the article sums it all up, really:
"The downside that the Devils had is that they couldn’t score goals or make saves so all the Corsi% in the world didn’t get them over the line for the playoffs."
And as he notes, at the very least, having Schneider will help with one half of the equation. Can't see the Devils putting up an aggragate .897 save% again.
We won't know for a while about the other half...these guys are going to need some time. I won't jump to any conclusions if they struggle to score OR somehow come flying out of the gate and pop in 3+ per game. Gotta see how this works out, and if the older guys can stay healthy.
Edited by Colorado Rockies 1976, 02 October 2013 - 12:07 PM.
Posted 02 October 2013 - 12:13 PM
People in the comments mentioned DeBoer's coaching style as an explanation. Does anyone know whether his Panther teams had unusually high puck possession as compared to wins and goals scored?
I collect spores, molds and fungus.
Hello fellow American. This you should vote me. I leave power. Good. Thank you, thank you. If you vote me, I'm hot. What? Taxes, they'll be lower... son. The Democratic vote is the right thing to do Philadelphia, so do.
How do you spot risk? How do you avoid risk? And what makes it so risky?
Posted 02 October 2013 - 12:31 PM
Florida results from 2008-09 to 2010-11:
48.7% goals percentage, 46.7% shots percentage, 47.1% Fenwick percentage. So, no. And again, we don't see this last year until the Devils got Ponikarovsky, Josefson got healthy, NJ got Zidlicky, etc. I think personnel is the major reason and it's why I think they're going to be darn good again this year in that department.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users