Jump to content

Photo

Confirmed : DeBoer is back


  • Please log in to reply
130 replies to this topic

#101 DJ Eco

DJ Eco

    Assistant Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,376 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 01:59 PM

I don't know why we're picking "Brunner or Ryder", like we have 4 stacked lines of great players throughout or something. There were a couple games we had Stephen Gionta on the 2nd line playing with Elias. Hell, who knows where Ryane Clowe stands going into next season... We were even using Gelinas a winger. This is the New Jersey Devils offensive depth chart, and it's reeeeeeally bad.

 

We absolutely need first line offensive talent so that the move of Ryder/Brunner to the 3rd line can be made, no-brainer. Until then, there's no use debating which one we could do without, because we need everyone we can, just to still be "not good enough" haha... I may be in the minority here but I think we still need both players going into next season.

 

Neither contract is really that bad; the problem is not Brunner or Ryder, it's that we needed them to be the 1st liners that they really aren't. We're not all crapping on Zubrus, are we? No. But why not? Out of the 3, he was the least value for money...


Edited by DJ Eco, 16 April 2014 - 02:06 PM.

  • 1

#102 ATLL765

ATLL765

    Assistant Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,157 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 02:03 PM

I definitely thought Brunner looked better than Ryder in the last stretch of games. I liked the Ryder signing because I thought he could be a younger, better Sykora, but god damn is he an AWFUL skater and the man can't stick handle around a fvcking cone, much less an NHL defenseman. He is the epitome of one dimensional.


  • 0

#103 CarterforPresident

CarterforPresident

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,569 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 03:00 PM

When Ryder goes missing he doesn't come back.
  • 0

#104 Martyisth3b3st

Martyisth3b3st

    Darth Brodeur

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,942 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 04:12 PM

After the last month of the season Id take Brunner over Ryder a million times over. Even disregarding the contract; Ryder looked slow and lazy. He has a wicked shot, that's about it. Reminds me of a Rolston (who hits the glass less, I suppose).
  • 0

2008, 2010, 2011 Pat Burns winner for 'Most emotional poster'
2011 UDX Signature award winner

Posted Image


#105 2ELIAS6

2ELIAS6

    Head Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,163 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 04:13 PM

theyre both a lose lose situation just depends on the week and who's turn it is to suck more than the other. Unfourtunently were stuck one more year
  • 0
believe-devs.jpg1dun.jpg

*authentic Martin Brodeur autographed goalie stick with COA for sale pm me if interested*

#106 Martyisth3b3st

Martyisth3b3st

    Darth Brodeur

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,942 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 04:13 PM

I don't know why we're picking "Brunner or Ryder", like we have 4 stacked lines of great players throughout or something. There were a couple games we had Stephen Gionta on the 2nd line playing with Elias. Hell, who knows where Ryane Clowe stands going into next season... We were even using Gelinas a winger. This is the New Jersey Devils offensive depth chart, and it's reeeeeeally bad.

We absolutely need first line offensive talent so that the move of Ryder/Brunner to the 3rd line can be made, no-brainer. Until then, there's no use debating which one we could do without, because we need everyone we can, just to still be "not good enough" haha... I may be in the minority here but I think we still need both players going into next season.

Neither contract is really that bad; the problem is not Brunner or Ryder, it's that we needed them to be the 1st liners that they really aren't. We're not all crapping on Zubrus, are we? No. But why not? Out of the 3, he was the least value for money...

How do you define value? Zubrus didn't have a great season but he isn't paid just to score goals, like Ryder and Brunner.

And to add to your other comment... You're wrong. They're getting top-6 minutes and barely playing better than AHLers. I would rather Reid Boucher than Michael Ryder playing on a top line any day of the week. Ryder's incredibly useless unless he has a top notch center able to gift him some open looks. He isn't a very talented player, and he doesn't belong anywhere on this team. You want him to play the third line? Good luck having him play in a checking role. The dude is slower than Cam freakin Janssen.

Edited by Martyisth3b3st, 16 April 2014 - 04:18 PM.

  • 0

2008, 2010, 2011 Pat Burns winner for 'Most emotional poster'
2011 UDX Signature award winner

Posted Image


#107 2ELIAS6

2ELIAS6

    Head Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,163 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 04:15 PM

How do you define value? Zubrus didn't have a great season but he isn't paid just to score goals, like Ryder and Brunner.

ive gotten on zubrus a little bit for his lack of goal contribution but he definently brings a lot more then these other 2 bums i would choose zubs over both of ryder and brunner any day of the week.
  • 0
believe-devs.jpg1dun.jpg

*authentic Martin Brodeur autographed goalie stick with COA for sale pm me if interested*

#108 Neb00rs

Neb00rs

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,399 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 05:06 PM

He was also healthy-scratched at times.  Not all of his missed games were due to injury.

 

I wonder is Brunner is one of those guys PDB basically tells Lou to trade if possible, that Brunner is simply a player that PDB can't work with.   

 

Re:  potential with Brunner, again, he's not a 22 or 23-year-old kid.  He's already 28.  And what still sticks out to me is that he couldn't find a job until just before the start of the regular season.  Guys do fall through the cracks from time to time, no question, and under the circumstances, I fully get why Lou rolled the dice on him, but his first season with the Devils almost seem the validate the teams that thought "Yeah, had a feeling he wouldn't do much.  We didn't miss out on anything."

 

The sooner we cut the guy the less painful it will be.


After the last month of the season Id take Brunner over Ryder a million times over. Even disregarding the contract; Ryder looked slow and lazy. He has a wicked shot, that's about it. Reminds me of a Rolston (who hits the glass less, I suppose).

 

But would you take Brunner? (see what I did there?)


  • 0

gallery_47_36_882.png of No One
Proud to be King of the Kovalnuts (Est. June 2010 by MantaRay)


#109 Triumph

Triumph

    A Legend

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 27,484 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 05:11 PM

How do you define value? Zubrus didn't have a great season but he isn't paid just to score goals, like Ryder and Brunner.

And to add to your other comment... You're wrong. They're getting top-6 minutes and barely playing better than AHLers. I would rather Reid Boucher than Michael Ryder playing on a top line any day of the week. Ryder's incredibly useless unless he has a top notch center able to gift him some open looks. He isn't a very talented player, and he doesn't belong anywhere on this team. You want him to play the third line? Good luck having him play in a checking role. The dude is slower than Cam freakin Janssen.

 

I'm as big of a Boucher supporter as there is but Boucher's not better than Ryder yet, and he may never reach Ryder's best.  He doesn't need a top center to gift him looks, he just needs someone with speed on his line, someone who can get defenders out of position a little.  The Devils didn't have that for Ryder for most of the 2nd half of the year.


  • 0

http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
 


#110 Devils731

Devils731

    A Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,469 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 05:35 PM

I'm as big of a Boucher supporter as there is but Boucher's not better than Ryder yet, and he may never reach Ryder's best. He doesn't need a top center to gift him looks, he just needs someone with speed on his line, someone who can get defenders out of position a little. The Devils didn't have that for Ryder for most of the 2nd half of the year.


And the player creating the space with speed needs to be able to muck it up along the boards too.

Brunner and Ryder playing together in a lot of games hurt both players since both players weak board play was exacerbated by the other player weak board play. Nobody could ever recover a puck.
  • 0
Your unconditional rejection of violence makes you smugly think of yourselves as noble, as enlightened, but in reality it is nothing less than abject moral capitulation to evil. Unconditional rejection of self-defense, because you think its a supposed surrender to violence, leaves you no resort but begging for mercy or offering appeasement.

-Terry Goodkind


Sex Panther cologne -- 50 percent of the time, it works every time.

-Anchorman

The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The second best time is now.

-Anonymous

Keeper of Section 212-213's wayward step

#111 EdgeControl

EdgeControl

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,316 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 08:21 PM

Ryder got his shots and a bunch of chances. he was plain missing the net on a lot of shots in the second half.  Id love to upgrade those positions but the truth is we cant. so they will be with us for one more year. and a bunch of us were all over zubrus. he hit a bad wall the 2nd half as well. finished out april well. and with thanks to jagr and travis he wound up in the plus territory for the year


  • 0

#112 coldply123

coldply123

    Assistant Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,184 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 08:46 PM

Ryder got his shots and a bunch of chances. he was plain missing the net on a lot of shots in the second half. Id love to upgrade those positions but the truth is we cant. so they will be with us for one more year. and a bunch of us were all over zubrus. he hit a bad wall the 2nd half as well. finished out april well. and with thanks to jagr and travis he wound up in the plus territory for the year


Because Jagr and Zajac had to carry him for a good portion. Zubrus has his qualities but he's got streaks where he struggles to fit in on a line. And Ryder can't miss on so many of his chances. He only does one thing well from a skill standpoint and if that isn't clicking he is a negative value player. Getting lots of shots isn't meaningless but when you need others to create those opportunities and get you space you need to create your own and Ryder isn't capable.
  • 0
Bill Simmons: "The Bruins are like Fredo -- they're dead to me as long as the owner is alive."

"I'm Going With The Devils over Anaheim"-Barry Melrose

#113 Zubie#8

Zubie#8

    Head Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,344 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 10:26 PM

Have to give some credit to Zubrus, that Jagr line was at its best with him on the wing which was an important line for many wins. The problem is he needs to be in a bottom 6 role but that just shows how little depth we have. But he is still a reliable player who is great defensively and is good on the PK. Like I said before he needs to be a Madden Brylin type player in this stage in his career and not forced to play top 6 minutes.

And for the record many of Ryder's shots were BS shots from long range on the rush with no chance at all. The guy is not good for this system. He cannot hang on to the puck to save his life. Yea he's good for 20 goals which we need but he can't generate goals for others and just drags his teammates down, the man has to be catered in order to succeed which is the opposite of what the system preaches.

Edited by Zubie#8, 16 April 2014 - 10:32 PM.

  • 0

believe-zubrus.jpg

 


#114 Marshall

Marshall

    Head Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,323 posts

Posted 17 April 2014 - 02:53 AM

Have to give some credit to Zubrus, that Jagr line was at its best with him on the wing 

 

The WOWY numbers tell the opposite.  


  • 0

Winner of the 2009-10 Slava Fetisov Award For Best International Poster
Winner of the 2011-2012 RD Avatar Award
believe2.jpg

www.numerartovertag.wordpress.com - An NHL Blog (in Swedish)


#115 devilsrule33

devilsrule33

    A Legend

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,954 posts

Posted 17 April 2014 - 04:43 AM

The WOWY numbers tell the opposite.  

 

Without looking at the numbers, my eyes would say the same. Jagr's offense might have dried up, but I think his scoring chances and the line was much stronger when Ruutu was there.


  • 0

logokx.jpg

"The Stanley Cup has fallen from the Stars. The new millennium has its first Stanley Cup Champion, and it's the New Jersey Devils." Mike Miller calling the Devils winning the Stanley Cup.

"It goes to the captain and then there are handoffs during a skate around the ice" Mike Emrick as Scott Stevens is being presented the Stanley Cup.


#116 Marshall

Marshall

    Head Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,323 posts

Posted 17 April 2014 - 05:22 AM

Without looking at the numbers, my eyes would say the same. Jagr's offense might have dried up, but I think his scoring chances and the line was much stronger when Ruutu was there.

 

I mean, it's not like he stunk it up with Zubrus. 57% Corsi with Zubrus, Jagr has 60% without him (633 and 577 mins of 5v5 ToI, respectively). Jagr is up to a 63% Corsi with Ruutu but that's 150 mins of play. 


  • 0

Winner of the 2009-10 Slava Fetisov Award For Best International Poster
Winner of the 2011-2012 RD Avatar Award
believe2.jpg

www.numerartovertag.wordpress.com - An NHL Blog (in Swedish)


#117 EdgeControl

EdgeControl

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,316 posts

Posted 17 April 2014 - 07:16 AM

I mean, it's not like he stunk it up with Zubrus. 57% Corsi with Zubrus, Jagr has 60% without him (633 and 577 mins of 5v5 ToI, respectively). Jagr is up to a 63% Corsi with Ruutu but that's 150 mins of play. 

I saw that move as a wash. imo, ruutu was supposed to score a few more goals but that didn't materialize either. very interchangeable players


  • 0

#118 lazer

lazer

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,716 posts

Posted 17 April 2014 - 10:24 AM

brunner had a year long tryout, buh bye.

 

soft on the puck


  • 0
Posted Image

#119 DJ Eco

DJ Eco

    Assistant Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,376 posts

Posted 17 April 2014 - 02:43 PM

I'm as big of a Boucher supporter as there is but Boucher's not better than Ryder yet, and he may never reach Ryder's best.  He doesn't need a top center to gift him looks, he just needs someone with speed on his line, someone who can get defenders out of position a little.  The Devils didn't have that for Ryder for most of the 2nd half of the year.

 

Brunner and Ryder playing together in a lot of games hurt both players since both players weak board play was exacerbated by the other player weak board play. Nobody could ever recover a puck.

 

Ryder got his shots and a bunch of chances. he was plain missing the net on a lot of shots in the second half.  Id love to upgrade those positions but the truth is we cant. so they will be with us for one more year. and a bunch of us were all over zubrus. he hit a bad wall the 2nd half as well. finished out april well. and with thanks to jagr and travis he wound up in the plus territory for the year

 

I agree with all 3 of these comments. I'm of the opinion that we only have Ryder for his shot. And it's a damn good shot. Ideally, we needed him for more, but we all knew what he was about before he put on a Devils jersey; I didn't really expect anything more. And I'll go one over and say I think he'll only do better next year.


  • 0

#120 DJ Eco

DJ Eco

    Assistant Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,376 posts

Posted 17 April 2014 - 02:56 PM

I feel like we all complain about how inept our offense is, how inept "New Jersey Devils offense" is. But when a player doesn't play "New Jersey Devils hockey", he gets crucified. It's like we're all programmed to want more Giontas and Carters on the team no matter how much we crap on them.

 

That kinda explains why so many Devils fans still didn't like Kovalchuk by the second half of our 2011-2012 season; you still heard boos and jeers when he'd touch the puck during a 2-3 game goalless drought. I feel like we're almost brainwashed to want the Giontas and Salvadors as the face of our Devils. Anything else (Kovys and Zidlickys of the game) is too edgy and not "safe".

 

It's something I've noticed in a large group of our fanbase, where a lot of Devils fans just can't stand guys like Ryder, Zidlicky, or Kovalchuk (when he was here), yet these guys will be top 3, 4, or 5 in the points department at any given point in the season. We'll complain about how we don't score, we play too defensively, but then sh!t on Zidlicky's or Ryder's two-way game.... Doesn't make sense. If our team actually went out and got a talent like Evander Kane or Alexander Semin, he could score 30+ goals but our fanbase would still hate him.


Edited by DJ Eco, 17 April 2014 - 03:02 PM.

  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users