Jump to content

Photo

Stanley Cup Finals historical data


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 Matteau#32

Matteau#32

    Senior Devil

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 998 posts

Posted 29 May 2014 - 07:06 AM

I know there are some guys on here who are really into the numbers and things like Corsi and Fenwick.  Thought you might find this info interesting that I compiled for a class I took last year.

 

Professor gave us a list of about 150 different ideas for a project, one of which involved the Stanley Cup Finals. So, choose it. Found some interesting results. Note: This was done last April, so last year's Chicago-Boston Final is not included.

Best of 7 for the finals started in 1939. Since then, their have been 20 sweeps, 17 times it has ended in 5, 20 times in 6 and 16 times in 7.

From 95-98, we had 4 straight sweeps, but since 99 only once has a series not gone 6 or 7 games (2007 Anaheim beat Ottawa in 5). 

From 71-2000, the series lasted 7 games only 3 times (71, 87, 94). Since 2001, 6 of 11 have gone 7 games.

Looked at the teams, but for this we didn't count 1995 (no, not because the Devils won) since the teams played completely different schedules. The team with more points in the regular season has won 54 times out of 70. Twice (75 and 92) the teams had the same amount of points, but in both cases the team that held the tie-breaker and thus home-ice advantage won the series.

Since 87 (again not including 95), the team with home-ice has won 18 out of 23 times.

The team with home-ice has LOST 3 of the last 4, but the same thing happened from 83-86. From 87-2008, the team with home-ice has won all but 2 (90 and 97).

So, if you want to place a wager based on history, take the team with home-ice if you are laying odds of 3.375-to-1 or less. Take the other team if you are GETTING odds of 3.375 to 1 or better. 

Also compared Points Percentage of each team (# of points earned in regular season divided by number of possible points). Most likely to see an upset if there is a difference of 5-9.99%. 13 times there has been an upset when the difference is less than 10%. Only 3 when the difference was greater than 10%, did the underdog win. One was 1980, and the other 2 were during the Original 6 days.

Quickly looked at play-offs. Since 87 when the first round went best-of-7, no team has ever won the Cup if they lost more than 6 games in the first 3 rounds combined. Only 4 times a team got to the Finals if they lost 7 games in the first 3 rounds (all 4 teams lost in the Finals). Nobody has ever got to the finals if they lost 8 or 9. If the Kings and/or Rangers win they will be the first to get to the finals after losing 8 (or 9). If the Rangers beat Montreal, we will also be guaranteed to have a team win the Cup after losing 7 or more.


  • 0
Posted ImagePosted Image

#2 DJ Eco

DJ Eco

    Assistant Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,531 posts

Posted 29 May 2014 - 08:20 AM

Some interesting numbers in there, thanks for sharing :)


  • 0

#3 lazer

lazer

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,795 posts

Posted 29 May 2014 - 08:47 AM

wait why not 95'?


  • 0
Posted Image

#4 AEWHistory

AEWHistory

    Rookie Devil

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 333 posts

Posted 29 May 2014 - 11:34 AM

I think because the strike shortened season threw the evalution numbers for determining Reg season points.
  • 0
Aaron / AEWHistory --- Rockies/Devils fan since 1981!

Trenton Makes and the World Takes..... Or.... Trenton Uses What the World Refuses

#5 Matteau#32

Matteau#32

    Senior Devil

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 998 posts

Posted 30 May 2014 - 06:23 AM

Yeah, like last year there was no inter-conference games.  Was like old school AL and NL.  The idea was that the better record was the better team, but if they are in different leagues doesn't really make sense.  Thing that really surprised me was 54 out of 70 for the team with home-ice.  55 out of 72 if you count 95 and 2013.


  • 0
Posted ImagePosted Image

#6 HellOnICE

HellOnICE

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,683 posts

Posted 30 May 2014 - 07:01 AM

Would love to know Cup results based on rests between CF and SCF.


  • 0

#7 Matteau#32

Matteau#32

    Senior Devil

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 998 posts

Posted 30 May 2014 - 09:15 AM

Would love to know Cup results based on rests between CF and SCF.

Wouldn't be hard to do as hockey-reference.com has the dates for every play-off game.  Collecting the data would be a VERY tedious process.


  • 0
Posted ImagePosted Image

#8 devilsrule33

devilsrule33

    A Legend

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,176 posts

Posted 30 May 2014 - 09:41 AM

Would love to know Cup results based on rests between CF and SCF.

 

Historically, I think a lot of rest hasn't been good. The Kings were fine in 2012 and the Ducks were not in 2003. The better team won both finals. I don't think there is enough data to take anything meaningful from it, anyway.


Edited by devilsrule33, 30 May 2014 - 09:42 AM.

  • 0

"The Stanley Cup has fallen from the Stars. The new millennium has its first Stanley Cup Champion, and it's the New Jersey Devils." Mike Miller calling the Devils winning the Stanley Cup.

"It goes to the captain and then there are handoffs during a skate around the ice" Mike Emrick as Scott Stevens is being presented the Stanley Cup.


#9 point

point

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,700 posts

Posted 31 May 2014 - 05:34 PM

Thanks for sharing.
  • 0
2 C6H12O6 > 2 C2H5OH + 2CO2




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users