Jump to content

Photo

Wanna buy a hockey league?


  • Please log in to reply
24 replies to this topic

#1 Rock

Rock

    The News Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,569 posts

Posted 03 March 2005 - 06:58 AM

Mar. 3, 2005. 01:00 AM
Wanna buy a hockey league?
Partners would take entire NHL

Owners cool to all-or-nothing deal


http://www.thestar.c...tacodalogin=yes

RICK WESTHEAD
BUSINESS REPORTER

A powerful Wall Street buyout firm and an upstart sports advisory company have made a dramatic joint proposal to buy all of the NHL's 30 teams for as much as $3.5 billion (U.S.).

Bain Capital Partners LLC and Game Plan International, both based in Boston, tabled the offer in a 30-minute presentation to NHL owners on Tuesday in New York, three sources told the Toronto Star.

The companies were invited to make their pitch by NHL commissioner Gary Bettman.

Bain managing partner Steven Pagliuca, co-owner of the NBA's Boston Celtics, and Game Plan, which recently acted as an adviser on the sale of hockey's Ottawa Senators, are betting that many NHL owners would welcome the chance to get out of the hockey business.

The NHL, which because of its ongoing player lockout recently became the first major North American pro sports league to cancel an entire season, has said its teams have lost a collective $500 million (U.S.) over the past two seasons.

It's unclear whether many of the league's owners, especially those with teams in large markets like Toronto, Boston and New York, would accept the offer.

Maple Leaf officials declined to comment, as did a Game Plan spokesman. Representatives for Bain and the NHL couldn't be reached.

A person familiar with the matter said no subsequent discussions between the league and the two companies were scheduled.

Response to the Bain/Game Plan proposal from more than 100 people at the meeting was muted.

Several in attendance said just one of the owners there asked a question of Bain and Game Plan
  • 0
Hockey is life, the rest is just details.

#2 LOTCB

LOTCB

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,980 posts

Posted 03 March 2005 - 07:18 AM

I was just listening to this idea on my way to work on 1050 E$PN Radio with Mike and Mike...and they both mentioned how this is an intriguing idea...of course Mike Greenberg went into the baseball end of it and said "Well if the Yankees make 1B dollars from the YE$ Network, the the Pirates and Royals will get equal money", which kind of showed me that Greenberg was thinking like a true Mets fan and Yankee hater, but thats another subject :P


Im not so sure about this idea. I believe that in sports since the beginning, some teams are just going to generate more revenue then others, and to me, if they want to invest more into their product on the ice, then they should have that luxury. The keys in the world of the NHL is to ensure the salaries do not get out of control and the players and owners all get what should be coming to them, plus ensure the payroll gaps between the haves and the have-nots are not out of control (to me in baseball, more teams are just flat out cheap, they CAN spend more $ but they do not choose to IMO, hockey is a little different)

I just do not believe it would be fair if the Buffalo Sabres, to use my team as an example, would get the same exact revenues that teams like New York and Toronto would get, teams like the Leafs were built to what they were over time and generate much more revenue and they earned that.
  • 0

Tim Murray (Buffalo Sabres GM) Quotes:  'It's Easy To Spend Money' "I’ve said at the start that if you don’t want to be here we’ll make it happen'

“We’re more competitive. We’ve got a lot of character now. We have leadership now. That’s important to me when you’re adding young players every year"

 

Truly, The Anti-Regier


#3 SueNJ97

SueNJ97

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,814 posts

Posted 03 March 2005 - 11:05 AM

Doesn't matter what they say about it operating like divisions of a large corporation that have their own budget and operate autonmously on personnel decisions (which, btw, is true...J&J doesn't tell its divisions who to hire for their open jobs). I can tell you exactly what the NHLPA would see this as...collusion. In theory, it should be able to work. But it would wind up in court so fast it would make your head spin.
  • 0
NJDevs.com Keeper of Lou Lamoriello (until he finds out & kills me that is)

Now that we are going to have a season, I can post these...
2004-2005 NJDevs.com winner of the Brodeur, Lamoriello and Howe awards, thanks guys, I appreciate the hat trick.

#4 LOTCB

LOTCB

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,980 posts

Posted 03 March 2005 - 11:14 AM

I agree SueNJ...and another point....if there was 1 owner for the entire league....you do not think that owner wouldnt want to see certian players in certian cities? If a place like Buffalo or Calgary have the best players, or those players are in New York or Chicago, what combo do you think will rake the most money in for the 1 sole owner?

It would be like old time baseball all over again.

No way I see this happening, nor do I agree with it.
  • 0

Tim Murray (Buffalo Sabres GM) Quotes:  'It's Easy To Spend Money' "I’ve said at the start that if you don’t want to be here we’ll make it happen'

“We’re more competitive. We’ve got a lot of character now. We have leadership now. That’s important to me when you’re adding young players every year"

 

Truly, The Anti-Regier


#5 '7'

'7'

    A Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,351 posts

Posted 03 March 2005 - 11:22 AM

we all know some owners were duped into the imaginary pot of gold by Bettman, but all 30 sell? impossible. They did this for some other reason.
  • 0
^7^ is just defending his sport sheeps.. as Alcibiades the exiled Athenian rationalizes in his speech to the enemy Spartans, he wants to take revenge on Athens because he loves it and can't stand to see the state it's in now - Triumph
Posted Image Posted Image

#6 NJD Jester

NJD Jester

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,719 posts

Posted 03 March 2005 - 11:57 AM

It's a pathetic attempt at some socialist uptopia that's supposed to solve all of the NHL's ills...

...save for the fact that there's no way to fairly assign marketing budgets to different teams around the league, when you have St. Louis competing against two other teams for ticket dollars and the Devils competing against (roughly) 12...

...and the fact that a certain amount of that "revenue pot" would have to be committed to new arena construction, and then who makes that decision...

...and that fact that while increased revenue sharing is vital to the continued vitality of the league, I will ask the same questions for the hundredth thousandth time: WHAT REVENUE?!

<JESTER>
  • 0
Posted Image


"Glow Pucks & 10-Cent Beer: The 101 Worst Ideas in Sports History" is available now online and at local bookstores.

Get your NJD fan stories published in Hell & Back: A People's History Of The New Jersey Devils. Visit The Hell & Back Homepage for details!

#7 LizDevil30

LizDevil30

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,761 posts

Posted 03 March 2005 - 12:11 PM

When I read this first thing I thought was that they are really scraping the bottom of the barrel to come up with hockey stories. The longer this drags on what'll be next? A reality tv show? Oh wait, didn't they try something like that in Canada? :P
  • 0
"Why is a puck called a puck? Because dirty little bastard was taken."-New Jersey Devils Goaltender Martin Brodeur, of whom I am happy co-keeper with poohbear.
His lean, limber muscles tensed under the skin are ready to contort his body into unnatural goal stopping positions. Tara Sullivan, Bergen Record.
A person's a person, no matter how small. Horton the Elephant, "Horton Hears a Who"
NEW JERSEY home of the Devils, Giants, Jets, Red Bull, Nets and the Statue of Liberty--standing on our front porch waving to the neighbors.

#8 MantaRay

MantaRay

    A Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,450 posts

Posted 03 March 2005 - 12:12 PM

This is a very interesting scenario in which the players will be nothing but employees in a professional sport. This would solve many of the NHL's ill and improve the marketablity of the game.

I would invest in this.
  • 0
I was wrong to ever doubt the powers of Lou Lamoriello.
IN LOU WE TRUST @Manta04


Posted Image

#9 Devils731

Devils731

    A Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,521 posts

Posted 03 March 2005 - 12:19 PM

This is a very interesting scenario in which the players will be nothing but employees in a professional sport.  This would solve many of the NHL's ill and improve the marketablity of the game. 

I would invest in this.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Ya, I wish I could get a piece of this action if all the owners agreed to sell.
  • 0
Your unconditional rejection of violence makes you smugly think of yourselves as noble, as enlightened, but in reality it is nothing less than abject moral capitulation to evil. Unconditional rejection of self-defense, because you think its a supposed surrender to violence, leaves you no resort but begging for mercy or offering appeasement.

-Terry Goodkind


Sex Panther cologne -- 50 percent of the time, it works every time.

-Anchorman

The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The second best time is now.

-Anonymous

Keeper of Section 212-213's wayward step

#10 Devs82-83

Devs82-83

    Draft Pick

  • Members
  • 8 posts

Posted 03 March 2005 - 12:30 PM

No.

Thank you.

See: MLS.
  • 0

#11 Derek21

Derek21

    A Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,873 posts

Posted 03 March 2005 - 12:32 PM

It's very interesting but I don't know what to think.
  • 0

"The greatest trick Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist."

 

Hasan, Brian and I blog at New York Puck. Devils, Islanders, Rangers and Sabres.


#12 Devs82-83

Devs82-83

    Draft Pick

  • Members
  • 8 posts

Posted 03 March 2005 - 12:37 PM

On second thought...Derek, this may be the chance for the rangers to finally get it right.
  • 0

#13 MadDog2020

MadDog2020

    A Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,046 posts

Posted 03 March 2005 - 02:57 PM

Honestly, this might be the stupidest idea I've ever heard.
  • 0
iq0p.pngUploaded with ImageShack.com

#14 MantaRay

MantaRay

    A Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,450 posts

Posted 03 March 2005 - 03:31 PM

Why? What is stupid about it?
  • 0
I was wrong to ever doubt the powers of Lou Lamoriello.
IN LOU WE TRUST @Manta04


Posted Image

#15 sundstrom

sundstrom

    Hall of Famer

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,356 posts

Posted 03 March 2005 - 04:33 PM

No.

Thank you.

See: MLS.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>



exactly right. the mls is owned by one corporation (that anshultz, the kings owner is head of).
  • 0

"This team was never the same once we lost Patrik Sundstrom"- Lou Lamoriello


20082719943.png
_________________________________________________________________
“They’re the ones that makes it happen,” Lemaire said. “It’s not us. It’s not me. It’s not the other guy. It’s not the guy before. It’s not the guy after. It’s them. And they have to take care of business.”
-
"I guess I just miss my friend" (#28)


#16 njdevils_info

njdevils_info

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,351 posts

Posted 03 March 2005 - 09:24 PM

I just saw this.... really, wtf. Come on now, guys. First off, all 30 teams will not sell. That's a given. Secondly, while I agree this might solve the Rag$ problems :rolleyes: (yah right) I don't think this will be the end all to NHL problems.

What are the advantages to this? It won't solve the problems between the owners (or if it was to sell, "owner") and employees (players).

Recently, Forbes magazine stated that the average NHL club was worth $163 million in 2003-04, but if the owners do decide to go through with the proposal that would lower the value of each team to about $117 million, although the larger-market clubs would be still be worth more.


Is that supposed to be good?

The two businesses feel that this move would add to the league's revenue because the teams would work as a whole, rather than individuals trying to beat each other.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but itsn't that the Board of Governors job to make the league work as a whole? And how are trades done? This is a bad idea in my mind.
  • 0
Posted Image<br>/\/ of the Jumbotron and it's 2 Ribbons<br><br>
Favorite Doc-ism:<br>* "I have a tremendous grasp for the obvious."<br><br>
Facorite Chico-isms:<br>Chico: "Actually its Brylin who jumped out with Pandolfo. I don't know if Madden was tired or if there's a problem..."<br>Doc: "The problem will be relieved as he comes out of the penalty box now!"<br>Chico: "Oh yeah that's right!"

#17 Zero

Zero

    NJDevs Trivia Champ

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 108 posts

Posted 03 March 2005 - 09:39 PM

The guy who made the bid was on "Prime Time Sports" (FAN Radio / Sportsnet TV) this evening. He made a really interesting case by discussing the particulars of the bid and why it makes sense. Basically, the league as a single entity would keep the teams from competing with each other for essential services. Each franchise would have a certain budget, a lot of operations would be centralised to save money. Instead of competing with each other for certain revenue streams, the teams would cooperate to maximise them. Executives would be rewarded for bringing in more revenue and making local revenues national, and so on.

Costs would be lower, revenues higher, and the labour situation would be entirely different since the league would be a single entity. You don't have to worry about the Rangers or Avalanche driving up the salary scale for smaller clubs anymore - which would be much less inflationary.

He also gave examples of how all local TV contracts would be consolidated so that if you lived in Boston and the Bruins were not playing that night they could show another game in that market.

In spite of the fact that it is a near impossibility that the league will actually sell (how can they possibly convince all 30 owners?), the system itself made a whole lot of sense. Too bad it's pie in the sky.

What was not discussed and what I wonder is - would it be possible for the current NHL owners to form a new corporation and basically buy itself? The equity of each team's actual value could be equal to their stake in the new single entity, so the owner of the Red Wings would own a higher percentage than that of the Ducks. The current owners and execs could them become (true) franchisees. There is probably a legal reason why it can't happen and they'd still have the challenge of getting all 30 owners to agree to it.
  • 0

#18 femalenynjazfan

femalenynjazfan

    Rookie Devil

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 422 posts

Posted 03 March 2005 - 09:54 PM

Can this get any worse. This is messed up.
  • 0

#19 Devs82-83

Devs82-83

    Draft Pick

  • Members
  • 8 posts

Posted 03 March 2005 - 10:18 PM

Although the NHL is not truly "national" in scope, certainly it is a "major league" entity.

This scenario is outrageous...this isn't the ill-fated roller hockey league of several years back...this is the friggin NHL for crying out loud! This is the NHL, a league with a proud and rich history...not the Arena Football League! This is the NHL...not the XFL, WHA, NASL, MLS...this ain't professional indoor lacrosse, the Professional Rodeo Association, the Women's Professional Fast Pitch Softball League...or any "minor league", and or, irrelevent sporting endeavor on the horizon.

Enough with this nonsense - I cannot believe the NHL board even gave this two seconds of their time.
  • 0

#20 MadDog2020

MadDog2020

    A Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,046 posts

Posted 03 March 2005 - 10:31 PM

Why? What is stupid about it?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>





You should be smart enough to see what's stupid about it. I'm not gonna sit here and type 5 pages on what's wrong with it.
  • 0
iq0p.pngUploaded with ImageShack.com




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users