I like the exlaimation mark better
What?
Oh you mean the post icon? Should be a devils logo!
EDIT: Unbelievable!
Edited by sammyk, 08 March 2006 - 09:43 PM.
Posted 08 March 2006 - 09:42 PM
I like the exlaimation mark better
Edited by sammyk, 08 March 2006 - 09:43 PM.
Posted 08 March 2006 - 09:44 PM
Posted 08 March 2006 - 10:10 PM
Posted 08 March 2006 - 10:13 PM
rafalski-matvichuk
martin-white
klee-hale
...poster claims to have a friend whos father know Kovalchucks agent's close partner and he was told by his friends father that they are just sorting the details out.
Posted 08 March 2006 - 10:16 PM
Posted 08 March 2006 - 10:17 PM
Posted 08 March 2006 - 10:24 PM


Chocolate + Devil = My life
Posted 08 March 2006 - 10:26 PM
Lets hope he regains his old form in our defensive minded system. Maybe a change of scenery is good for him. Sorry to see Suglobov go but I doubt he had a future here. Anyway wasn't Suglobov a free agent anyway at the end of this year? So he could have/probably would have walked in free agency anyway.Let's see what happens next. Maybe Klee will be a solid addition.
Posted 08 March 2006 - 10:37 PM
Here. Here. I can't remember when I've been more disappointed in a move..... I usually held out hope that each trade would help us, but I think this was just pissing away a chip and filling cap space. This has really destroyed the buzz I had from the baseball game.
This is why Lou got him: Klee was born April 24, 1971 in Indianapolis, IN.

Posted 08 March 2006 - 11:02 PM
Posted 08 March 2006 - 11:04 PM
Look. If you had asked me yesterday if I would have taken Ken Klee off the Leafs hand in exchange for a PAPER CLIP I would have turned it down. He is not worth the salary he is making and that $2M could have been used for MUCH, MUCH better things.
Klee is an UFA at the end of the year. Does Lou think that this means we are going to win the Stanley Cup? What do we really GAIN here?
Suglobov for a draft pick.
Suglobov for another prospect.
Suglobov for donut.
I don't care.... but not Suglobov *FOR KEN KLEE*
I don't understand it. I don't know what the heck Lou was thinking. I've still got steam coming out of my ears so I'm going to bed before I have a coronary.


Chocolate + Devil = My life
Posted 08 March 2006 - 11:04 PM
Look. If you had asked me yesterday if I would have taken Ken Klee off the Leafs hand in exchange for a PAPER CLIP I would have turned it down. He is not worth the salary he is making and that $2M could have been used for MUCH, MUCH better things.
Edited by Hasan4978, 08 March 2006 - 11:05 PM.
Posted 08 March 2006 - 11:13 PM
This is not a $2 million investment, the Leafs have already paid 3/4 of his salary and cap costs are accrued per day not based on total value of the contract. It's about a $500,000 investment for the Devils, or $50,000 more than Darren Langdon will make for sitting on his toosh since December.
Posted 08 March 2006 - 11:14 PM
Look. If you had asked me yesterday if I would have taken Ken Klee off the Leafs hand in exchange for a PAPER CLIP I would have turned it down. He is not worth the salary he is making and that $2M could have been used for MUCH, MUCH better things.
Klee is an UFA at the end of the year. Does Lou think that this means we are going to win the Stanley Cup? What do we really GAIN here?
Suglobov for a draft pick.
Suglobov for another prospect.
Suglobov for donut.
I don't care.... but not Suglobov *FOR KEN KLEE*
I don't understand it. I don't know what the heck Lou was thinking. I've still got steam coming out of my ears so I'm going to bed before I have a coronary.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
Posted 08 March 2006 - 11:22 PM
Posted 08 March 2006 - 11:22 PM
Posted 08 March 2006 - 11:30 PM
The Devils would have been better for calling Suglobov up and actually playing him! He mastered the AHL. He kicks its ass on a regular basis. I could see trading him for a Dman if that was our problem but we are rolling along just fine with what we have back there. Where we need help is up front scoring goals and that is what he can do. We have asked young players to make big offensive contributions before (see Gomez, Scott and Sykora, Petr). so it is not like this would be something new.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
Posted 08 March 2006 - 11:42 PM
Posted 08 March 2006 - 11:50 PM
Posted 09 March 2006 - 12:08 AM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users