Edited by Satans Hockey, 25 June 2006 - 12:37 AM.
Golden Goal Or Not?
Posted 25 June 2006 - 12:35 AM
Posted 25 June 2006 - 11:49 AM
I'm for the "Silver Goal"
(when a team scores... the period must be finish... only one period)
Add more drama than play all 30 minutes
Is less cruel than Golden Goal
Didn't think of that one. Scoring has just been so low, that a golden goal might as well be used, cause im sure 95% of the time the team scoring that silver goal would win the game.
Posted 25 June 2006 - 12:21 PM
and there is nothing like pure excitement a game ending on a goal... not waiting 20 more minutes to celebrate
2006 Pat Burns Award Winner(Most emotional Poster)
2006 JHL CHAMPION!!
2005 CHAMPION of the 1st Annual NJDevs Fantasy Wrestling League!!!
2005 Finalist 1st Annual NJDEVS Fantasy Baseball League
2005 Pat Burns Award Winner(Most emotional Poster)
2004 LockOut Trivia CHAMP!!!
Keeper of The original Welcome to Hell Forum, Jimmy Dowd, Brian Rolston, "Christmas Tree" Jersey's and the Original Trade Documents of the FREEZE man!!
BOM U11G Dynamite
Posted 25 June 2006 - 12:33 PM
Maybe it's my hockey bias, but I like sudden-death. The rest of the game seemed rather anti-climatic as Argentina spent most of the time playing keep-away.
"Denny Crane!" - Denny Crane
"Trix are for kids!" - Denny Crane
"I hate cling-ons!" - Denny Crane
Posted 25 June 2006 - 12:45 PM
France scored TWO in extra time and the Germans then scored two of their own.........and then won it on penalties.......
One of the most exciting games ever in WC History. You wouldn't have had it with a Golden Goal.
Posted 25 June 2006 - 01:51 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users