Bhutto Assassinated
#1
Posted 27 December 2007 - 02:30 PM
http://www.cnn.com/S...utto/index.html
#3
Posted 27 December 2007 - 03:15 PM
#4
Posted 27 December 2007 - 03:16 PM
#5
Posted 27 December 2007 - 03:59 PM
#6
Posted 27 December 2007 - 08:38 PM

of "It's a power play goal! F*** you Sam Rosen!"
#7
Posted 27 December 2007 - 08:40 PM
This could destabilize his position in government.
#8
Posted 28 December 2007 - 12:29 PM
All the same, it is a sad day for the people of Pakistan.
#9
Posted 28 December 2007 - 03:46 PM

"Martin Brodeur is the gold standard of goaltending -- the model of character, consistency and commitment to the craft. A champion. A winner above all.
"It is difficult to imagine any player who is more universally, and deservedly, respected. The National Hockey League is extremely proud of Martin, his historic achievement and his enduring contribution to our game."
#10
Posted 28 December 2007 - 10:23 PM
I don't think Musharref had anything to do with it, to be honest.
This could destabilize his position in government.
I agree, that would be the logical conclusion -- but logic just never seems to play apart in government. BUT Musharref has been pretty logical (in a self-serving sense, sure) in all his dealings thus far
I'm here for the party

Just say no to Moe
#11
Posted 29 December 2007 - 09:48 AM
Some of our resident lefty loons may take issue with your "flag waving"I don't know enough about her history to have a comment of any value other than thanking God I'm an American. We should all be more grateful for the freedom and stability we have here. Our country has some issues but is still the greatest.
#12
Posted 01 January 2008 - 05:12 PM
#13
Posted 03 January 2008 - 05:24 PM
Lefty loons...haha your like a real life Bill O'Reilly.Some of our resident lefty loons may take issue with your "flag waving"
Objectivity.
#14
Posted 03 January 2008 - 05:54 PM
The problem is exacerbated by a dramatic drop-off in U.S. expertise on Pakistan. Retired American officials say that, for the first time in U.S. history, nobody with serious Pakistan experience is working in the South Asia bureau of the State Department, on State’s policy planning staff, on the National Security Council staff or even in Vice President Cheney’s office. Anne W. Patterson, the new U.S. ambassador to Islamabad, is an expert on Latin American “drugs and thugs”; Richard A. Boucher, the assistant secretary of state for South and Central Asian affairs, is a former department spokesman who served three tours in Hong Kong and China but never was posted in South Asia. “They know nothing of Pakistan,” a former senior U.S. diplomat said.
Current and past U.S. officials tell me that Pakistan policy is essentially being run from Cheney’s office. The vice president, they say, is close to Musharraf and refuses to brook any U.S. criticism of him. This all fits; in recent months, I’m told, Pakistani opposition politicians visiting Washington have been ushered in to meet Cheney’s aides, rather than taken to the State Department.
Cheney’s office has been linked to some of the most damaging and reckless policies carried out under President Bush, including the origins of the war in the Iraq, warrantless domestic spying, the historic expansion of executive authority and the sanctioning of torture. It’s no surprise to find Cheney’s fingerprints on the failing U.S.-Pakistan policy as well.
#15
Posted 03 January 2008 - 08:49 PM
Another loony left hatchet job pumped up by zanies like Camden28.In yesterday’s Washington Post, respected Pakistan analyst Ahmed Rashid explained a key problem with current U.S. policy:
The problem is exacerbated by a dramatic drop-off in U.S. expertise on Pakistan. Retired American officials say that, for the first time in U.S. history, nobody with serious Pakistan experience is working in the South Asia bureau of the State Department, on State’s policy planning staff, on the National Security Council staff or even in Vice President Cheney’s office. Anne W. Patterson, the new U.S. ambassador to Islamabad, is an expert on Latin American “drugs and thugs”; Richard A. Boucher, the assistant secretary of state for South and Central Asian affairs, is a former department spokesman who served three tours in Hong Kong and China but never was posted in South Asia. “They know nothing of Pakistan,” a former senior U.S. diplomat said.
Current and past U.S. officials tell me that Pakistan policy is essentially being run from Cheney’s office. The vice president, they say, is close to Musharraf and refuses to brook any U.S. criticism of him. This all fits; in recent months, I’m told, Pakistani opposition politicians visiting Washington have been ushered in to meet Cheney’s aides, rather than taken to the State Department.
Cheney’s office has been linked to some of the most damaging and reckless policies carried out under President Bush, including the origins of the war in the Iraq, warrantless domestic spying, the historic expansion of executive authority and the sanctioning of torture. It’s no surprise to find Cheney’s fingerprints on the failing U.S.-Pakistan policy as well.
Bitter much?
#16
Posted 04 January 2008 - 02:46 PM
#17
Posted 04 January 2008 - 08:52 PM
Wait....I thought is was Rove's fault
Britney is Rove's fault!
"Current and past U.S. officials tell me that Pakistan policy is essentially being run from Cheney’s office." WHO THE HELL ARE THE CURRENT AND PAST U.S. OFFICIALS?!
It's actually quite funny that this punk can't name a source.
Edited by LOULAM1, 04 January 2008 - 08:53 PM.
#18
Posted 05 January 2008 - 04:05 PM
Another loony left hatchet job pumped up by zanies like Camden28.
Bitter much?
I dont consider myself too liberal or conservative but why do you have such problems with people expressing what they feel about certain topics?
#19
Posted 07 January 2008 - 12:14 AM
#20
Posted 07 January 2008 - 12:23 AM
'cause Camden28 is a liberal hatchet lady. She is a far left kook who attacks me at all times and I don't care for her kind.I dont consider myself too liberal or conservative but why do you have such problems with people expressing what they feel about certain topics?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users















