Slats head scratching summer
#1
Posted 20 July 2008 - 10:52 AM
It's not often that I agree with Larry Brooks, but he justifiably seems upset with the dumb Ranger moves this offseason.
Which only goes to prove that Don Maloney was the true architect of the last two Ranger teams that made the playoffs.
Its good to have Slats back ruining/running the show at MSG
IN LOU WE TRUST @Manta04
#2
Posted 20 July 2008 - 11:21 AM
But I do feel a little queezy agreeing with Larry Brooks so much.

"I don't like those Rangers fans from New Jersey." - Jim Dowd
#3
Posted 20 July 2008 - 11:36 AM
I said it after the Redden signing and reiterated it after the Naslund signing ... it's good to have the late-'90s, early-'00s Rangers back. That first post-lockout team actually scared me, but now that Sather is being Sather again we should all breathe a little easier.
But I do feel a little queezy agreeing with Larry Brooks so much.
Me too.
IN LOU WE TRUST @Manta04
#4
Posted 20 July 2008 - 11:44 AM
As much as I hate to agree with Brooks....he nails it in this article. The Queen will be seeing a lot more quality shots this season.I said it after the Redden signing and reiterated it after the Naslund signing ... it's good to have the late-'90s, early-'00s Rangers back. That first post-lockout team actually scared me, but now that Sather is being Sather again we should all breathe a little easier.
But I do feel a little queezy agreeing with Larry Brooks so much.

Official Keeper of David Clarkson's Open Ice Hits!
Official Keeper of the stains on Chico's shirt and tie from "Chico Eats" episodes!
#5
Posted 20 July 2008 - 11:58 AM
Edited by nmigliore, 20 July 2008 - 11:58 AM.
LETS GO DEVILS
- Jim Leyland"Take all that clubhouse [expletive] and all that, throw it out the window. Every writer in the country has been writing about that [expletive] for years. Chemistry don't mean [expletive]."
#6
Posted 20 July 2008 - 12:02 PM
Pads are smaller too this year, no? I think thats a HUGE factor that not many people are remembering.. Obviously for Brodeur is just a laughable matter since he already has the smallest pads.. but for the Queen Lundqvist its gonna effect him
I'm not sure that is going to take effect this year. I read in some article that since they were going to make the equipment in relation to the body size of the goalie that it was going to take at least a year to develop. I hope we see change this year, but I don't know.


Brodeur's 2002 Olympic Gold Medal
The kisses on the back of Marty's mask
Travis Zajac
After Marty got so mad at his sons for throwing thunderstick packages onto the ice during a
Devils / Rangers game~
"I explained to them that by doing what they had done, they were basically acting like Rangers fans." ~Marty Brodeur - Beyond the Crease
#7
Posted 20 July 2008 - 12:04 PM
Looks like the Queen is still gonna be a btch to score on.. gotta shoot high on him, he doesn't even have to try with the low shots b/c of his big hulking pads.
LETS GO DEVILS
- Jim Leyland"Take all that clubhouse [expletive] and all that, throw it out the window. Every writer in the country has been writing about that [expletive] for years. Chemistry don't mean [expletive]."
#8
Posted 20 July 2008 - 12:08 PM
What? Now they aren't..? I thought they were making goalie pads smaller..
Looks like the Queen is still gonna be a btch to score on.. gotta shoot high on him, he doesn't even have to try with the low shots b/c of his big hulking pads.
#9
Posted 20 July 2008 - 12:09 PM
It says there might be subtle changes this year, but probably nothing major.


Brodeur's 2002 Olympic Gold Medal
The kisses on the back of Marty's mask
Travis Zajac
After Marty got so mad at his sons for throwing thunderstick packages onto the ice during a
Devils / Rangers game~
"I explained to them that by doing what they had done, they were basically acting like Rangers fans." ~Marty Brodeur - Beyond the Crease
#10
Posted 20 July 2008 - 12:09 PM
What? Now they aren't..? I thought they were making goalie pads smaller..
Looks like the Queen is still gonna be a btch to score on.. gotta shoot high on him, he doesn't even have to try with the low shots b/c of his big hulking pads.
That's how we beat Giggy and the Ducks in 2003, shoot high stick side.
#11
Posted 20 July 2008 - 12:13 PM
fvck off go to your rags forum, everybody here realizes goalies like Giguere, Luongo, and Lundqvist and others are over-rated from their ridiculous pad size.
Get over it.
Edited by nmigliore, 20 July 2008 - 12:14 PM.
LETS GO DEVILS
- Jim Leyland"Take all that clubhouse [expletive] and all that, throw it out the window. Every writer in the country has been writing about that [expletive] for years. Chemistry don't mean [expletive]."
#12
Posted 20 July 2008 - 12:28 PM
If you look closely, the knee rolls are moved down a bit to make room for the cooling hydra coils inside the shin and the rotating knee lifts.fvck off go to your rags forum, everybody here realizes goalies like Giguere, Luongo, and Lundqvist and others are over-rated from their ridiculous pad size.
Get over it.
Also, notice the break in his glove. The reason it's like that is because there are actually 7 finger stalls in the glove. He can change the position of his hand, and that in turn changes the angle of his glove in relation to his C/A arm.
Also noted: Worn on the goaltender's legs to both protect the legs and help stop shots. The leg pads may not be more than 12 inches (300 mm) in width. (Current NHL Rules have reduced this to 11 inches (280 mm) in width, while also restricting the overall height to 38 inches.) The leg pads should come to about three inches above the knee. Pads that are too long will affect balance and timing; pads that are too short will not protect the knees or make butterfly saves properly.
It's perfectly legit. Making this argument that "Oh! HIS LEG PADS AER 2 BIG! Is like making the argument that Brodeur's "records" are nullified due to the uber devil's trap system during your peak.
Sounds ridiculous? That's because it is.
Edited by Rangerfans, 20 July 2008 - 12:38 PM.
#13
Posted 20 July 2008 - 12:43 PM
That's how we beat Giggy and the Ducks in 2003, shoot high stick side.
Why don't we go out and get like a 1,000 pound guy and have him lay sideways in front of the net the whole game? I mean, how much room could there possibly be? Let him eat a few sandwiches between plays (keep in game shape!) and can have him join Chico's Eats segments!
Now THAT is better than big pads!
One is a low life bottom feeder that lives on the feces of others. The other is a fish"
Official Keeper of THE BUD LIGHT GOAL BAR
#14
Posted 20 July 2008 - 12:44 PM
#15
Posted 20 July 2008 - 12:45 PM
Why don't we go out and get like a 1,000 pound guy and have him lay sideways in front of the net the whole game? I mean, how much room could there possibly be? Let him eat a few sandwiches between plays (keep in game shape!) and can have him join Chico's Eats segments!
Now THAT is better than big pads!
Now that sounds like Marty Brodeur last season
Relax, please put the pitch folks down, I'm just teasing.
That was actually Islander's owner Charles Wang's idea. He proposed to get sumo wrestlers and use them as goalies.
...taken directly from The Mighty Ducks! Good ol' Goldberg...creator of the "Fat kid = goalie" stereotype for years to come.
I hate that movie.
#16
Posted 20 July 2008 - 12:49 PM
uh oh, so llundqvist is actually going to have to learn to play goal now! does this mean he will challenge the shot instead of sitting on the goal line like a soccer keeper?
Can someone answer me a question, because I've failed to figure this one out.
Ok...people complain about the "crazy" thigh guards that up from the "thigh" and are used predominately by butterfly goalies so when they "close" their legs per se, the gap is immediately shut. Ok, so I can see how those can benefit the 5-hole.
...but if a goalie extends his leg to make a pad save, how can a thigh guard which (again) is at the thigh, assist in a PAD save that hits near his shin.
Hmm....
#17
Posted 20 July 2008 - 01:01 PM
but i can understand why you are mad, being a rags fan and all. that must be why you're here, so you can at least be around people on a winning team
#18
Posted 20 July 2008 - 01:13 PM
Yea it's complete bullcrap if we don't see changes this season. They can probably knock this out within a month if they were serious about it.I'm not sure that is going to take effect this year. I read in some article that since they were going to make the equipment in relation to the body size of the goalie that it was going to take at least a year to develop. I hope we see change this year, but I don't know.
--John Buccigross
#19
Posted 20 July 2008 - 01:17 PM
point out where anyone said anything about a thigh guard? i'm going to take a guess and assume you're a non-playing genius, but that's okay. henrik's pads are pretty much at the league maximum. his strengths are moving side to side, and low shots because of that. he rarely challenges, and gets beat up high for most of his goals.
but i can understand why you are mad, being a rags fan and all. that must be why you're here, so you can at least be around people on a winning team
Assume I'm a non-playing genius all you want, because you're wrong. I won't assume that you don't play the game (but if you play "deck" hockey, please...deck hockey is a joke) because that's just asinine.
You said it spot on: Henrik's pads are within league regulation . So if they were "too big" *gasp* they would be deemed illegal. Sadly that is not the case.
And who says I'm mad? I thought we had a pretty successful season and - truth be told - I very much enjoyed the majority of the regular season and particularly the first round of the playoffs.
I'm not entirely sure why the "bitterness." Because I wil be the first to admit the ranger's faults, your utter domination of us in the past, etc.
But when we "win" and you blame "the pads" of a goalie, that's just pathetic. Suck it up.
#20
Posted 20 July 2008 - 01:29 PM
Assume I'm a non-playing genius all you want, because you're wrong. I won't assume that you don't play the game (but if you play "deck" hockey, please...deck hockey is a joke) because that's just asinine.
You said it spot on: Henrik's pads are within league regulation . So if they were "too big" *gasp* they would be deemed illegal. Sadly that is not the case.
And who says I'm mad? I thought we had a pretty successful season and - truth be told - I very much enjoyed the majority of the regular season and particularly the first round of the playoffs.
I'm not entirely sure why the "bitterness." Because I wil be the first to admit the ranger's faults, your utter domination of us in the past, etc.
But when we "win" and you blame "the pads" of a goalie, that's just pathetic. Suck it up.
well taking personal shots at each other's hockey status is dumb, since we don't know each other, so we should probably stop with that. there was no bitterness towards you, since i know you guys were better than us last season. i never said they were too big, i was stating that henrik's skill is mostly in his equipment. the smaller they make the league maximum, the worse he will become.
and just to start a fun argument, you guys didn't have a successful season. all that money, all those goal scorers, and the highest paid goaltender in the league (
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













