Edited by devlman, 04 February 2010 - 03:53 PM.
Rumor- Kovalchuk to Devils
#721
Posted 04 February 2010 - 03:53 PM
#722
Posted 04 February 2010 - 03:57 PM
#723
Posted 04 February 2010 - 03:57 PM
2011= KOVALCUP
#724
Posted 04 February 2010 - 03:59 PM
one of the morons 'covering' hockey for espnews mentioned not to forget about the flyers as atlanta had scouts there last week. hello? they have had scouts at 3 of our games including a lowell-hartford game! the bias against the devils is pissing me off, it will make it that much better when this goes through
it's not bias, it's ESPN's sh!tty hockey coverage, which probably consists of Barnaby and Melrose sitting in a break room playing NHL 10 all day, in between their 3 appearences a week.
#725
Posted 04 February 2010 - 04:01 PM
it's not bias, it's ESPN's sh!tty hockey coverage, which probably consists of Barnaby and Melrose sitting in a break room playing NHL 10 all day, in between their 3 appearences a week.
Excellent.
2011= KOVALCUP
#726
Posted 04 February 2010 - 04:03 PM
it's not bias, it's ESPN's sh!tty hockey coverage, which probably consists of Barnaby and Melrose sitting in a break room playing NHL 10 all day, in between their 3 appearences a week.
#727
Posted 04 February 2010 - 04:11 PM
one of the morons 'covering' hockey for espnews mentioned not to forget about the flyers as atlanta had scouts there last week. hello? they have had scouts at 3 of our games including a lowell-hartford game! the bias against the devils is pissing me off, it will make it that much better when this goes through
Dude, you seriously need to take a chill pill. All the guy said was not to forget about the Flyers as a possible destination. He's not under a journalistic obligation to mention in every single article about Kovalchuk that Atlanta had scouts at more Devils games. It has nothing to do with bias.

I collect spores, molds and fungus.
Hello fellow American. This you should vote me. I leave power. Good. Thank you, thank you. If you vote me, I'm hot. What? Taxes, they'll be lower... son. The Democratic vote is the right thing to do Philadelphia, so do.
How do you spot risk? How do you avoid risk? And what makes it so risky?
#728
Posted 04 February 2010 - 04:12 PM
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=308935


Chocolate + Devil = My life
#729
Posted 04 February 2010 - 04:13 PM
Well, Kovalchuk turns down a 101M/12yrs deal from Waddell. Let the risk begin.
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=308935
You are about 3 pages too late
#730
Posted 04 February 2010 - 04:15 PM
Edited by The Facepainter, 04 February 2010 - 04:15 PM.
#731
Posted 04 February 2010 - 04:28 PM
Was there any follow up on what Potvin said on his radio show?
He won't suck as much if we get Kovalchuk.
#732
Posted 04 February 2010 - 04:32 PM
#733
Posted 04 February 2010 - 04:36 PM
I'm just wondering, how can KHL teams afford to pay their players so much when they play fewer games with less capacity?
Russian mafia

I fvcking hate animated avatars and signatures.
#734
Posted 04 February 2010 - 04:37 PM
TG is saying some KHL team is reported to have offered Kovalchuk some monster contract with 3/4 of it promised upfront. I don't know anything about the KHL, but I see that all of their arenas are small (7000 - 11000 seat capacity), and they play far fewer games per season than the NHL. I'm just wondering, how can KHL teams afford to pay their players so much when they play fewer games with less capacity?
the teams that spend big money are owned by oil billionaires who don't care if their team makes money.
Edited by Triumph, 04 February 2010 - 04:38 PM.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#735
Posted 04 February 2010 - 04:43 PM
TG is saying some KHL team is reported to have offered Kovalchuk some monster contract with 3/4 of it promised upfront. I don't know anything about the KHL, but I see that all of their arenas are small (7000 - 11000 seat capacity), and they play far fewer games per season than the NHL. I'm just wondering, how can KHL teams afford to pay their players so much when they play fewer games with less capacity?
KHL teams always try this, and have had success with only one bona fide NHL star that I know, Jagr, although even that's debatable. Some teams there are known to renege on payments to players, and I certainly wouldn't want anything to do with the Russian court system to enforce a contract with the local oligarch. The level of competition is nowhere near the NHL, plus, no matter what kind of money they're paying you, you still live in a country that for the large part is slightly above a third world country.

I collect spores, molds and fungus.
Hello fellow American. This you should vote me. I leave power. Good. Thank you, thank you. If you vote me, I'm hot. What? Taxes, they'll be lower... son. The Democratic vote is the right thing to do Philadelphia, so do.
How do you spot risk? How do you avoid risk? And what makes it so risky?
#736
Posted 04 February 2010 - 04:45 PM
Man, I know I wouldn't want to have that. That's some mafia holding it over your head for the next decade.TG is saying some KHL team is reported to have offered Kovalchuk some monster contract with 3/4 of it promised upfront. I don't know anything about the KHL, but I see that all of their arenas are small (7000 - 11000 seat capacity), and they play far fewer games per season than the NHL. I'm just wondering, how can KHL teams afford to pay their players so much when they play fewer games with less capacity?
#737
Posted 04 February 2010 - 04:48 PM
it's not bias, it's ESPN's sh!tty hockey coverage, which probably consists of Barnaby and Melrose sitting in a break room playing NHL 10 all day, in between their 3 appearences a week.
Post of the day, sir, post of the day.
"The real fans are always going to be the fans. They’re always going to support you." Ilya Kovalchuk, 11/11/2010
Proud winner of the 2009-10 NJDevs Conn Smythe Trophy for best poster during the playoffs
#738
Posted 04 February 2010 - 04:58 PM
the teams that spend big money are owned by oil billionaires who don't care if their team makes money.
Yea that's what I figured. Although still, $100 million is not exactly chump change, even to a billionaire. It just sort of boggles the mind that these people throw away so much money just to have their team win some championship without regard to whether they'll get it back or not. It's somewhat similar in European soccer, although at least in soccer there is a huge rabid fanbase that fills up hugh stadiums, which the KHL doesn't seem to have.
KHL teams always try this, and have had success with only one bona fide NHL star that I know, Jagr, although even that's debatable. Some teams there are known to renege on payments to players, and I certainly wouldn't want anything to do with the Russian court system to enforce a contract with the local oligarch. The level of competition is nowhere near the NHL, plus, no matter what kind of money they're paying you, you still live in a country that for the large part is slightly above a third world country.
Yep I have a friend who grew up in Russia and their legal system is basically a joke. One of his second cousins just got arrested for pimping (
#739
Posted 04 February 2010 - 05:00 PM
#740
Posted 04 February 2010 - 05:00 PM
This is driving me insane!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












