don't think he has the mental toughness. He just loses his control far too often. You can't lose this game...you were down 5-0 and rallied...and he gagged it up.
time to start auditioning new closers
Edited by '7', 03 September 2011 - 09:32 PM.
Posted 03 September 2011 - 09:23 PM
Edited by '7', 03 September 2011 - 09:32 PM.
Posted 03 September 2011 - 09:27 PM
Edited by '7', 03 September 2011 - 09:27 PM.
Posted 03 September 2011 - 09:35 PM
Edited by nmigliore, 03 September 2011 - 09:40 PM.
- Jim Leyland"Take all that clubhouse [expletive] and all that, throw it out the window. Every writer in the country has been writing about that [expletive] for years. Chemistry don't mean [expletive]."
Posted 04 September 2011 - 08:10 AM
David Wright since returning from the DL in late July: .313/.387/.497, 5 HR, 15.9 K%, 10.4 BB%. That's very good, especially that strikeout rate.
Posted 04 September 2011 - 08:17 AM
Posted 04 September 2011 - 01:55 PM
Posted 04 September 2011 - 02:30 PM
Posted 06 September 2011 - 10:33 PM
Edited by '7', 06 September 2011 - 10:35 PM.
Posted 10 September 2011 - 03:11 PM
Posted 11 September 2011 - 07:02 PM
Edited by nmigliore, 11 September 2011 - 07:28 PM.
- Jim Leyland"Take all that clubhouse [expletive] and all that, throw it out the window. Every writer in the country has been writing about that [expletive] for years. Chemistry don't mean [expletive]."
Posted 11 September 2011 - 10:59 PM
I'm going to be watching the Jets' game a hell of a lot more than the Mets' game tonight, but the Mets' 9/11 ceremony just now was amazing.
On the flipside, its a complete DISGRACE that MLB is not allowing them to wear the NYPD/NYFD hats. Disgusting.
Posted 11 September 2011 - 11:26 PM
Posted 12 September 2011 - 06:14 AM
Really would've been nice to see David Wright get a hit there against Ramon Cruz with the bases loaded to win it...sigh
Posted 12 September 2011 - 09:20 AM
Edited by nmigliore, 12 September 2011 - 09:27 AM.
- Jim Leyland"Take all that clubhouse [expletive] and all that, throw it out the window. Every writer in the country has been writing about that [expletive] for years. Chemistry don't mean [expletive]."
Posted 12 September 2011 - 11:29 AM
For all the hate Wright gets, you'd think he's awful. His 131 wRC+ this season ranks tied for 2nd best among 3B this season with A-Rod. Michael Young leads the pack. But that's better than Kevin Youkilis, Aramis Ramirez, Evan Longoria, Chipper Jones, Evan Longoria, Ryan Zimmerman.... I could go on, but its useless. All the stats that people on this board care about are the garbage ones that hold little meaning.
Posted 12 September 2011 - 12:00 PM
From a hitting perspective? Yes, he has been good. He ranks near the top in hitting at his position. How is that not good? And even if you want to look past the position argument, a 128 wRC+ is nothing to scoff at -- that means hes been 28% better than league average -- and it ranks tied for 37th overall in MLB. This isn't some skeptical, advanced stat either; think of wRC+ as basically a much better version of OPS+.He hasn't been that good. No sabermetric spin-doctoring can change that. At the very least, he is definitely not what he was. Do you really think he's been good this year? No sabermetrics...just a simple yes or no answer.
And you're going to take that ridiculously small sample for granted? Check the season rate. Its 20.5%; that's drastically down from last year's rate 24%. Come on... if you're going to pick with Wright's numbers, the strikeout rate is probably the worst argument you can make. The fact Wright has kept his strikeouts under control pretty well should give you some hope that he MAY be able to return to the elite hitter he was a few years ago. Or if not that, then at least hold off this belief* that hes in declineBTW the Ks are ticking up again...9 in his last 7 games.
Edited by nmigliore, 12 September 2011 - 12:13 PM.
- Jim Leyland"Take all that clubhouse [expletive] and all that, throw it out the window. Every writer in the country has been writing about that [expletive] for years. Chemistry don't mean [expletive]."
Posted 12 September 2011 - 04:46 PM
From a hitting perspective? Yes, he has been good. He ranks near the top in hitting at his position. How is that not good? And even if you want to look past the position argument, a 128 wRC+ is nothing to scoff at -- that means hes been 28% better than league average -- and it ranks tied for 37th overall in MLB. This isn't some skeptical, advanced stat either; think of wRC+ as basically a much better version of OPS+.
And you're going to take that ridiculously small sample for granted? Check the season rate. Its 20.5%; that's drastically down from last year's rate 24%. Come on... if you're going to pick with Wright's numbers, the strikeout rate is probably the worst argument you can make. The fact Wright has kept his strikeouts under control pretty well should give you some hope that he MAY be able to return to the elite hitter he was a few years ago. Or if not that, then at least hold off this belief* that hes in decline
*: Which I don't buy anyway; I think Wright just peaked early and everyone falsely believed (believes?) hes headed for some steep, offensive decline as if hes in his mid-30's.
The only problem I have with Wright is something I've stated numerous times: defense. Defensive metrics can be dangerous if not used properly, but there are a multitude of metrics that have painted Wright as a very poor defender for 2-3 years now; there's a very good chance that is accurate and not just some noise.
Posted 15 September 2011 - 06:27 AM
Posted 15 September 2011 - 09:06 AM
- Jim Leyland"Take all that clubhouse [expletive] and all that, throw it out the window. Every writer in the country has been writing about that [expletive] for years. Chemistry don't mean [expletive]."
Posted 15 September 2011 - 11:22 AM
Whatever, CR. I've said my piece. I'm tired of constantly repeating stuff. If you really think Wright's offensive season is not good despite clear statistics that say otherwise.... then whatever, believe what you want. The only thing we're going to really agree on is that his defense is problematic, and yes, that does cut into his value as an overall player.
Regarding Beltran, again, this is a situation we'll never agree on. His numbers with the Giants (.926 OPS) are fantastic, yet you continue to look at the glass half empty while I tend to view it as the glass half full; I'm sure the answer is somewhere in the middle.
Edited by Colorado Rockies 1976, 15 September 2011 - 11:28 AM.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users