Jump to content

Photo

Off-season Plan, Parts 1, 2, and 2½


  • Please log in to reply
78 replies to this topic

#1 Triumph

Triumph

    A Legend

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 27,511 posts

Posted 03 May 2010 - 04:15 PM

I've held off on these, mostly because it's another too-long offseason. Lou will be interviewing coaching candidates at Camp David, and he won't be hiring one until after the draft, which is in over 6 weeks, in which we don't have a first round pick. Meanwhile, Kovalchuk's already off on his Aeroflot flight (Aeroflot... to Russia in style!), never to return. Somehow, this team has turned the city of Newark into a pit of despair.

This first scenario is kind of a worst-case scenario. Since so many of these scenarios involve one player (e.g. Eric Belanger - who is just one man short of a few teeth, after all), I figure I will do 2 or 3 with different players, then kind of combine them. Note that I don't think this is at all what WILL happen, or what SHOULD happen, but rather what COULD happen.

Scenario The First: Barbarism -

or where Lou goes out and tries to get the toughest players and loses all of the current players.

Sign Raffi Torres - 2 years, 4.4 million
Sign Dominic Moore - 3 years, 5.4 million
Sign Brad Winchester - 2 years, 1.5 million
Trade 4th round pick and LW Andrew Peters for RW Petteri Nokelainen
Trade Brian Rolston and Matt Halischuk for D Brendan Witt and 7th round pick

Sign Dan Hamhuis 5 years 22.5 million
Sign Andy Sutton 2 years 4 million

Parise-Zajac-Zubrus
Torres-Elias-Langenbrunner
Zharkov-Moore-Clarkson
Winchester-Pelley-Nokelainen

EX: Leblond

Salvador-Greene
White-Hamhuis
Sutton-Corrente

EX: Fraser, Salmela

Brodeur
McKenna

Here's how that looks cap-wise:

Posted Image

Chart is pretty self-explanatory - red indicates UFA, green indicated RFA estimated contract, the strikethrough is for players who won't actually be on the team.

Edited by Triumph, 01 June 2010 - 02:38 PM.

  • 0

http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
 


#2 Risky

Risky

    Head Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,701 posts

Posted 03 May 2010 - 04:18 PM

I just threw up in my mouth. That team would score maybe 164 goals. Maybe.

Edit: You also traded for Witt and left him out of the defensive lineup. Or is that a salary dump move to get rid of Rolston and help NYI get rid of Witt?

Edited by Risky, 03 May 2010 - 04:22 PM.

  • 0
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe... Attack ships on fire off the shoulder
of Orion. I've watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate.
All those moments will be lost in time... like tears in the rain.

#3 Triumph

Triumph

    A Legend

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 27,511 posts

Posted 03 May 2010 - 04:27 PM

I just threw up in my mouth. That team would score maybe 164 goals. Maybe.

Edit: You also traded for Witt and left him out of the defensive lineup. Or is that a salary dump move to get rid of Rolston and help NYI get rid of Witt?


that is what i did, yes. witt was waived by the islanders, and there were obviously no takers.

this lineup would probably score around 200 goals.
  • 0

http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
 


#4 SatansDevils

SatansDevils

    OOT Scoreboard Specialist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,006 posts

Posted 03 May 2010 - 04:37 PM

Kovalchuk is not going to go play for Russia in the KHL next season. He wants to win a SCC in the NHL. Period.

I still believe Lou and Kovalchuk/agent will get a deal done to have Kovalchuk here in New Jersey for the next four years. Then we can work on other players from there.

Sign Raffi Torres - 2 years, 4.4 million
Sign Dominic Moore - 3 years, 5.4 million
Sign Brad Winchester - 2 years, 1.5 million
Trade 4th round pick and LW Andrew Peters for RW Petteri Nokelainen
Trade Brian Rolston and Matt Halischuk for D Brendan Witt and 7th round pick

Sign Dan Hamhuis 5 years 22.5 million
Sign Andy Sutton 2 years 4 million



D Brendan Witt no thanks! he is washed up. Don't want to waste Halischuk in that deal.

Torres and Moore wouldn't mind but too many years mentioned and too much money.

No way they would take a 4th round pick and Peters for RW Petteri Nokelainen. I would like to see that but just won't take that.

Agree with signing Dan Hamhuis but less years and money. Same for Sutton.

Edited by SatansDevils, 03 May 2010 - 04:38 PM.

  • 0

brodeurcups.png682 WINS, 124 SHUTOUTSgallery_1080_56_3521.png Keeper of #9-Zach Parise, Brodeur's All-Time Wins/Shutout Record (552+, 104+) FIRE & ICE Lounges @ Prudential Center.
5,580 fans for Devils/Flyers Blizzard game on 2/10/10, RD Avatar Award Winner: '08-'09 for best Avatar


#5 capo

capo

    Senior Devil

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 833 posts

Posted 03 May 2010 - 05:08 PM

Trying to do these types of things are very difficult because we don't know the direction the team is going in. Three consecutive first round exits means going back to the drawing board. Having Lemaire fail the way he did means it's time to go in a completely different direction. They were doing that with Sutter and had great success with exception to the playoffs. Before the Devils can decide on a roster they have to decide on a direction and get a coaching staff in place. The coaches have to have a lot of say in who they want on the ice. Giving somebody a team and saying here go coach them isn't going to work. They tried that with Lemaire and he killed this teams chemistry. They have to bring someone in who is going to be able to bring his type of players to New Jersey and who can coach the kids that are coming up. Specifically, the young defensemen; Corrente, Fraser, Eckford...
  • 0

#6 Elias26

Elias26

    Head Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,572 posts

Posted 03 May 2010 - 05:16 PM

I like the Witt & Peters idea, other than that I'll wait for Off-season Plan, Part 2.
  • 0
Bobby Holik wouldn't name a (Christmas) song. He said: "Music means nothing to me." When Tom Gulitti of the
Record suggested he'd be called Scrooge, Holik said: "It won't be the first time." -Bobby Holik Christmas 2008

“I made a decision to be here. Just because the team is going through a rough time doesn’t mean you leave. This has become my second home. I love playing here. Patrik Elias January 31, 2011

#7 Neb00rs

Neb00rs

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,399 posts

Posted 03 May 2010 - 06:07 PM

You didn't address any problem areas. Hamhuis can't replace Martin and Elias is stilling playing center with Kovy not even there. Why sign Torres? Do we need another left wing? Bring on part 2.
  • 0

gallery_47_36_882.png of No One
Proud to be King of the Kovalnuts (Est. June 2010 by MantaRay)


#8 Brandon

Brandon

    Trenton Devil

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,092 posts

Posted 03 May 2010 - 06:23 PM

Thats a low scoring team right there..........
  • 0
25smul5.png

#9 NJDevs26

NJDevs26

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,334 posts

Posted 03 May 2010 - 06:41 PM

No, the true nightmare scenario is the exact same team coming back minus Kovalchuk and Martin and with another short-term solution (which is to say no solution) at coach like a Hitchcock and no major additions. And sadly that's not too far out of the realm of possibility.
  • 0

#10 DaneykoIsGod

DaneykoIsGod

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,187 posts

Posted 03 May 2010 - 06:53 PM

Posted Image
  • 0
Posted Image

"I don't like those Rangers fans from New Jersey." - Jim Dowd

#11 sundstrom

sundstrom

    Hall of Famer

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,251 posts

Posted 03 May 2010 - 08:35 PM

you said it - WORST case scenario.

bravo on d. moore - that's my i told you so from last year when i lamented all summer that lou didn't sign him or malholtra and instead went for the suck that was rob neidermayer.

also - very good job with rolston. giving up halischuk hurts and i think you could get that deal done without him.

edit; 3 sentences weren't enough of a response for the effort.

i'm not quite sure what the point of winchester is - the devils have a chance to see what some of their kids can do - palmieri for instance. why bring in another guy there?

andy sutton? do the devils need another big body that's not so great with the puck and not that great a skater? i feel like this is just another colin white. i think i'd rather give fraser the shot if we can't do better. andy sutton seems like the type of player that a certain kind of team signs knowing they're trading him at the deadline for a 2nd round pick.

i'm also not sure raffi torres is a second line guy. i hate rolston as much as the next guy but is torres better - taking out the contracts? the devils have plenty of space in your scenario and could keep rolston (and halischuk in your scenario) and just pass on torres.

you've often said yourself that it's very unlikely that 5 or 6 UFA's are brought in ("not the rangers" comment).

i guess my reaction to this is "i hope not" because i simply couldn't convince myself the team was any good. it's almost like a rangers offseason - just enough not to be terrible but no real direction for the present or the future.

Edited by sundstrom, 03 May 2010 - 09:08 PM.

  • 0

"This team was never the same once we lost Patrik Sundstrom"- Lou Lamoriello


20082719943.png
_________________________________________________________________
“They’re the ones that makes it happen,” Lemaire said. “It’s not us. It’s not me. It’s not the other guy. It’s not the guy before. It’s not the guy after. It’s them. And they have to take care of business.”
-
"I guess I just miss my friend" (#28)


#12 sundstrom

sundstrom

    Hall of Famer

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,251 posts

Posted 04 May 2010 - 12:38 PM

hmmm. intelligent insight and work and very few responses.

guess you're gonna have to do better than that dr. nick.
  • 0

"This team was never the same once we lost Patrik Sundstrom"- Lou Lamoriello


20082719943.png
_________________________________________________________________
“They’re the ones that makes it happen,” Lemaire said. “It’s not us. It’s not me. It’s not the other guy. It’s not the guy before. It’s not the guy after. It’s them. And they have to take care of business.”
-
"I guess I just miss my friend" (#28)


#13 Triumph

Triumph

    A Legend

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 27,511 posts

Posted 04 May 2010 - 12:47 PM

whoops. i didn't see your edit.

you said it - WORST case scenario.

bravo on d. moore - that's my i told you so from last year when i lamented all summer that lou didn't sign him or malholtra and instead went for the suck that was rob neidermayer.


i think malhotra really, really wanted to go to SJ. when moore was a member of the wild, he got waived. moore still doesn't convince me, though - he's a stopgap until josefson can arrive.

also - very good job with rolston. giving up halischuk hurts and i think you could get that deal done without him.


this i seriously doubt and i think i was being favorable to the devils. while i have the islanders as way, way below the salary floor, they're really not, because bonuses count towards the salary cap, so guys like okposo, bailey, tavares, etc. all count like 2 million. rolston is just awful, there's no way anyone wants that contract unless there's an assurance that rolston won't play that 4th year.

i'm not quite sure what the point of winchester is - the devils have a chance to see what some of their kids can do - palmieri for instance. why bring in another guy there?


i like winchester's ability to hit people. while hit counting is really, really awful - so bad that the NHL probably shouldn't bother - winchester hits a lot of people. he's a big guy who can skate and put in 5-10 goals if things go right. palmieri is not this sort of player.

andy sutton? do the devils need another big body that's not so great with the puck and not that great a skater? i feel like this is just another colin white. i think i'd rather give fraser the shot if we can't do better. andy sutton seems like the type of player that a certain kind of team signs knowing they're trading him at the deadline for a 2nd round pick.


probably not, but he is a physical player. this iteration was just about getting more physical.

i'm also not sure raffi torres is a second line guy. i hate rolston as much as the next guy but is torres better - taking out the contracts? the devils have plenty of space in your scenario and could keep rolston (and halischuk in your scenario) and just pass on torres.


rolston is so bad. i mean granted he was handed to the wolves with niedermayer and clarkson but he is not good.

you've often said yourself that it's very unlikely that 5 or 6 UFA's are brought in ("not the rangers" comment).


in the summer of 2007 the devils brought in vishnevski, weekes, zubrus, rachunek, and asham. i don't see the devils bringing in 5 guys, but 4 is certainly possible.

i guess my reaction to this is "i hope not" because i simply couldn't convince myself the team was any good. it's almost like a rangers offseason - just enough not to be terrible but no real direction for the present or the future.


i'd be shocked if 2 of these things happened.
  • 0

http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
 


#14 jagknife

jagknife

    Assistant Coach

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,436 posts

Posted 04 May 2010 - 07:54 PM

ask the buffalo Sabres how Torres plays.

He was a healthy scratch for their last 2 playoff games and did not score a single goal while on their team.
  • 0

NewKeeperSig.png of each of Toronto's 6 shots on goal in Game 6


#15 Devils Pride 26

Devils Pride 26

    General Manager

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,982 posts

Posted 04 May 2010 - 08:31 PM

Hamhuis is an absolute must if we lose Martin imo.
  • 0

#16 vadvlfan

vadvlfan

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,591 posts

Posted 05 May 2010 - 06:07 AM

Look what Malholtra's doing for San Jose? He can win some key faceoff's. Halischuk will be on big club next year imo.
Problem with Rolston (tri- i assume you through in Halichuk to make Rolstons contract more palatable) and Peters (as valuable as George Laroque). Nobody has any desire to have him. One great thing in nhl, the dinosaurs are gone -(The riley cote's, george laroques, ,andrew peters, derek bougaurds) you need a 4th line wiht 'energy". Love the idea of Moore too.

I thought most of the call ups last year did decent (Halischuk, Palmieri, Davis, Corrente, Sestito)
  • 0

"Never make someone a priority when all you are to them is an option" - M.A.


#17 Triumph

Triumph

    A Legend

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 27,511 posts

Posted 13 May 2010 - 02:58 PM

Well, predictably no one liked the first one, and why should they?

This next one, I like to call: Re-Centering

We all know that Zubrus is better as a winger than as a center, but if the alternative is a schmuck like Rob Niedermayer at center, it's a luxury the Devils just cannot afford. The 3rd line was a massive waste, getting outchanced at a Montreal-like rate. With only a few 3rd line centers out there, and most of them being the same guys we passed over last off-season, I see no reason to think we're going to do any better. So we decide to leave Elias and Zubrus at center - Zubrus is a perfectly adequate 3rd line center, miles better than Needmybrother.

Sign Alexei Ponikarovsky 4 years, 13.2 million
Sign Steve Begin 1 year, 800k
Sign Paul Martin 5 years, 25.5 million
Sign Pavel Kubina 3 years, 11.4 million


Parise-Zajac-Langenbrunner
Rolston-Elias-Ponikarovsky
Zharkov-Zubrus-Clarkson
Leblond-Begin-Pelley

ex: Peters

Kubina-Martin
White-Greene
Salvador-Fraser

ex: Salmela

Brodeur
McKenna

Before I get yelled at for not putting Corrente on the team - Fraser and Salmela are basically non-entities, so it's not hard to waive such players if needed. I imagine Corrente will make the team out of camp, but one never knows. It also might be because I forgot about him and didn't want to re-make the spreadsheet. You decide which.

Posted Image

Edited by Triumph, 13 May 2010 - 03:03 PM.

  • 0

http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
 


#18 Neb00rs

Neb00rs

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,399 posts

Posted 13 May 2010 - 03:17 PM

This one is better.

First off, I'll assume you meant to switch Rolston and Pony's positions. Then I'll go on to say the Pony would be a valuable and well-priced player to the Devils. However if Rolston can't be moved I refuse to see him on the second line with Elias. It's time to stop screwing Elias over. We need to get him playing at center or left wing with permanent line partners. I think it's necessary to get him back at left wing because I personally don't like him at center. He likes playing there, and I like Elias in the center of the ice, but his faceoff issues are more than evident.

On a minor note: I think if you want Martin for 5 years then your looking more at 26.5-27M. No way he gets a flat rate for 5 years.

I love the idea of getting Kubina and playing him with Martin. Kubina's shot and size plus Martin's D and skating ability sounds great to me.

I have to say though, I really like all your defensive parings. I like the idea of Salvador and Fraser at 5 and 6-should add some nice physicallity. Salvador and Salamela would be an interesting risk to take though.

I'm with you on Begin, he's good at center and that 4th line looks great.

Assuming we can't get rid of Rolston:
Overall:
Like the 1st line
Like the 2nd line
Love the 3rd line
Love the 4th line

I'm still waiting for your "keeping Kovy scenario"

Edited by ben00rs, 13 May 2010 - 03:25 PM.

  • 0

gallery_47_36_882.png of No One
Proud to be King of the Kovalnuts (Est. June 2010 by MantaRay)


#19 njdevil26

njdevil26

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,336 posts

Posted 13 May 2010 - 03:20 PM

Tri, I think the offense on that squad is horrible.

Ponikarovsky ended up being a healthy scratch for Pitt in the playoffs.

I honestly say:
Dump: Pandolfo, Niedermayer, McAmmond, Mottau

Sign: Matt Lombardi, Joe Corvo

And if Kovy isn't an option, go after Patrick Marleau!

I'd also trade White but I'm not sure that's realistic.

Parise-Zajac-Langenbrunner
Kovalchuk/Marleau-Lombardi-Elias
Rolston-Zubrus-Zharkov
Leblond-Pelley-Clarkson

Ex- Palmieri- Vasyunov- Tedenby?

Martin-Salvador
Greene-Corvo
White-Corrente

Ex Fraser, URBOM, Eckford, Salmela

Brodeur
Danis, McKenna, Frazee whatever.
  • 0

#20 maxpower

maxpower

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,427 posts

Posted 13 May 2010 - 03:22 PM

1)

Parise-Zajac-Zubrus
Torres-Elias-Langenbrunner
Zharkov-Moore-Clarkson
Winchester-Pelley-Nokelainen

2)

Parise-Zajac-Langenbrunner
Rolston-Elias-Ponikarovsky
Zharkov-Zubrus-Clarkson
Leblond-Begin-Pelley

2 is better at C, but I'm not convinced that's that much better overall.
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users