New Kovy Update ("As the Kovy Turns")
#6961
Posted 26 July 2010 - 08:37 AM
#6962
Posted 26 July 2010 - 08:52 AM
I'm here for the party

Just say no to Moe
#6963
Posted 26 July 2010 - 09:18 AM
I don't know,I'm trying to get a picture where we can clearly see his 2 eyes but all the pictures I found for the moment don't really show a color difference between his eyes.
Try these ones:
http://www.gettyimag...ty-Images-Sport
http://www.gettyimag...ty-Images-Sport
http://www.nj.com/de...s_wait_for.html
Sorry for the subject, but I think you can see his eyes really close here: http://www.youtube.c...feature=related
Edited by GIRLNRED, 26 July 2010 - 09:22 AM.

#6964
Posted 26 July 2010 - 09:21 AM
(My right. Not stage right.)
Edited by njdevil26, 26 July 2010 - 09:23 AM.
#6965
Posted 26 July 2010 - 09:37 AM

-This is Team-
Anyone who says, ‘You played in that New York area,’ I say, ‘No, I played in New Jersey.’ - Ken Daneyko
#6966
Posted 26 July 2010 - 09:39 AM
So...when's the deadline for the NHLPA?
5pm today.
Edited by njdevil26, 26 July 2010 - 09:39 AM.
#6968
Posted 26 July 2010 - 10:08 AM
#6969
Posted 26 July 2010 - 10:08 AM
I'm here for the party

Just say no to Moe
#6970
Posted 26 July 2010 - 10:13 AM
also i do not understand why the deadline is today, but everyone has been reporting this. the league did not officially reject the deal until tuesday.
Edited by Triumph, 26 July 2010 - 10:14 AM.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#6971
Posted 26 July 2010 - 10:20 AM
my favorite part of the CBA (involved in this whole mess) is the procedure for filing a grievance - they basically have a clause for what happens if the NHL is screening its calls.
also i do not understand why the deadline is today, but everyone has been reporting this. the league did not officially reject the deal until tuesday.
A few reports said "Tuesday" but the general consensus has been Monday at 5pm. I think the NHL may have actually rejected it and notified the Devils/Grossman on Monday.
#6972
Posted 26 July 2010 - 10:29 AM
This From Brooks - NY Post
Bettman’s Kovalchuk prosecution merely a temper tantrum
http://www.nypost.co...ECwc5Mu0780RP4I
Bettman's ill-advised quest to impose a one-size-fits-all cap onto 30 teams with varying needs and constituencies is in tatters. The Kovalchuk contract, which meets every legal standard outlined in the collective bargaining agreement, is merely the latest example of a powerful team acting creatively in order to keep as much of its personnel intact as possible.
This case isn't about big market vs. small market, not with the Devils ranking between 13th and 16th in league revenues, though that's the umbrella under which the commissioner fights every battle. This one is simply about Bettman stamping his feet in a temper tantrum and using his power to force a moribund NHLPA to gear up and fight a fight it may or may not be prepared to wage.
The NHL hard-cap CBA doesn't necessarily discriminate against big-market clubs, it discriminates against successful clubs. The Devils aren't good because they have a high payroll, they have a high payroll because they've been a standard of excellence since the early '90s. The same applies to franchises like Detroit and Philadelphia, teams with ownerships that desperately want to win.
Wow, go Brooksie!
Edited by devlman, 26 July 2010 - 10:29 AM.
#6973
Posted 26 July 2010 - 10:30 AM

2012 Eastern Conference Champions
#6974
Posted 26 July 2010 - 10:36 AM
#6975
Posted 26 July 2010 - 10:41 AM
the one thing i hate about this is: if they don't file the grievance, he's a UFA again, if they do but lose the arbitration, he's a UFA again. There's nothing there short of an arbitration win that lets us hold on to him without another team possibly then trying to sign him or him heading to the KHL, even though this all still does seem to be a Bettman loss in the end, just sucks there's that possibility Kovy could end up somewhere else...
kovalchuk could sign with the KHL at any time, so this process doesn't stop anything. i also don't think there's very much to worry about with another team signing him, the devils' offer blew any other non-russian offer out of the water.
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
#6976
Posted 26 July 2010 - 10:47 AM
If you happen to be Devils president Lou Lamoriello, you would have to like your chances if the PA takes the contract to arbitration.
Like a lenient parent, the NHL's previous tolerance for cap manipulation has moved, in a perfectly logical and possibly legal direction, to the Kovalchuk deal. The league had a chance to take a stand against Roberto Luongo's contract with the Canucks. (His 12-year extension, which expires in 2021-22, pays him $1 million each in the final two seasons, when he is 41 and 42. He makes $10 million this season.) The league could have bridled at Pronger's deal with the Flyers, which drops to $525,000 the final two years before he qualifies for unrestricted free agency in 2017-18, just prior to his 43rd birthday. Marian Hossa's deal in Chicago, $7.9 million now but $750,000 the last two years when theoretically he retires after the 2020-21 season at age 42, was even more of a stretch given the position he plays, but the NHL considered these deals merely pushing the envelope but not quite overstuffing it.
The other teams were doing 74 in a 65 mile-per-hour zone, but when the Devils did 76, NHL deputy commissioner Bill Daly turned on his siren and flashed his red light.
If there is not quite precedent for the Kovalchuk signing, there has been enough erosion of principles that probably places Lamoriello on the right side of the issue. This was not a 40-year deal that was going to take Kovalchuk into rarefied Gordie Howe territory, but a nudge-nudge, wink-wink deal that made an elite goal-scoring winner available at the low cap hit of $6 million annually until his presumed retirement at an age when he practically will start wanting his dinner by 4:30.

"I don't like those Rangers fans from New Jersey." - Jim Dowd
#6977
Posted 26 July 2010 - 10:56 AM

-This is Team-
Anyone who says, ‘You played in that New York area,’ I say, ‘No, I played in New Jersey.’ - Ken Daneyko
#6978
Posted 26 July 2010 - 11:09 AM
Also I am stating here -- Daniel we ALL understand there is always a chance the Devils will lose if this goes to arbitration. When one person judges something the chances are always 50/50. If they lose you cannot say "As unhappy as I am, I TOLD you all there was a very real chance this would happen" We all KNOW that and always have. When the point is not made in every post it doesn't mean we need you to remind us. It doesn't mean we've missed something you've seen. No amount of speculation has merit if the decision isn't up to us. This whole board is pointless if you want to look at things that way. Fact of the matter is if the arbiter hates SCott Stevens, he's going to rule against the Devils
Edited by Pepperkorn, 26 July 2010 - 11:09 AM.
I'm here for the party

Just say no to Moe
#6979
Posted 26 July 2010 - 11:14 AM
His right eye looks wonky.
(My right. Not stage right.)
Mine is too - just not so bad as his
Edited by Pepperkorn, 26 July 2010 - 11:43 AM.
I'm here for the party

Just say no to Moe
#6980
Posted 26 July 2010 - 11:28 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users




This topic is locked







